Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0321
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/04/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Reilly Bear Garden Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0321 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 4, 2022 DUE DATE: January 10, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is December 02, 2022. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.4 – As the development package is designed for review of site related issues remove all references to the building code such as: construction type, occupancy bathroom requirements, etc. from the plan. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide a phone number for the owners listed on the plan. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0321, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B – Label all streets that abut this site on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Since this project includes exterior improvements that are visible from the right-of-way, and is located within the boundaries of the Infill Incentive District - Rio Nuevo Area (RNA) overlay zone, it will need to show compliance with the RNA standards specified in the Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 5.12.7, and go through the Design Review Board (DRB) for review. Also, since the structure is located in the pending Downtown National Register, the project will need to go through the Tucson-Pima Historical Commission's Plans Review Subcommittee (PRS) for review (UDC 5.12.7.F.4). Contact Maria Gayosso at maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov with any questions about these reviews. Provide the case number(s) adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, and if applicable any conditions of approval. The RNA & DRB must be approved prior to approval of this DP. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Provide the gross floor area for each building and the outdoor seating area. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide an expansion calculation as the proposed roof seating area is an expansion of use area. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A - - Provide site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - The following information for Pennington & Scott shall be provided, right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until comment 8 is addressed parking requirements cannot be verified. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.1.b the required side street perimeter yard setback is 10’-0” and as no setback dimensions have been provided Zoning cannot specify what the proposed setback is. As RNA review allows for prevailing setbacks the proposed setback must be approved by RNA. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage, height, the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 01/10/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 01/21/2022 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | john vincent john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
| 02/04/2022 | FRANK PODGORSKI | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD DATE | Passed | Email from: Jodie Brown To: CDRC Fri 2/4/2022 12:02 PM It was determined that Historic review was not required on this property. It is non-contributing. Jodie Brown, AICP Historic Preservation Officer 520.837.6968 |
| 02/04/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | |
| 12/13/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | Engineering was passed during the first OK to Submit. |
| 12/13/2021 | MGAYOSS1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Denied | Since this project includes exterior improvements that are visible from the right-of-way, and is located within the boundaries of the Infill Incentive District - Rio Nuevo Area (RNA) overlay zone, it will need to show compliance with the RNA standards specified in the Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 5.12.7, and go through the Design Review Board (DRB) for review. Also, since the structure is located in the pending Downtown National Register, the project will need to go trough the Tucson-Pima Historical Commission's Plans Review Subcommittee (PRS) for review (UDC 5.12.7.F.4). Once first round of comments are issued from the reviewers for the Development Package (DP21-0321) and the construction documents (T21CM08315), you can proceed with the submittal of your Design Packet for review by the PRS and the DRB. So here are your next steps: 1. E-mail me (maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov) the complete Design Packet, which should include the application form (https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/integrated-planning/Special_Districts_Application_Revised_9-10-21_fillable.pdf) , plus all materials specified in the application form to demonstrate compliance with RNA and historic requirements; Jodie Brown (our Historic Preservation Officer) and I will look at the packet and may require additional materials and may request clarifications; 2. Once Design Packet is ready to be accepted, I'll give you instructions for payment of the $385.00 RNA/historic review fees; 3. Once fees are paid, Jodie will schedule the meeting for PRS review and I will then schedule the meeting for review by the DRB. Please email me if there are any questions (maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov). Thanks. |
| 12/13/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed |