Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0310
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/14/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/14/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 01/14/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 01/14/2022 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 01/26/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC Wed 1/26/2022 2:27 PM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 631-2030 |
| 02/01/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the buildings or as a separate permit. 2. Provide an evaluation by Tucson Water for the need for the installation of a double check valve assembly (DCVA)for this water service. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf |
| 02/03/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: AZ Loft Living Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0310 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 3, 2022 DUE DATE: February 10, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is January 11, 2023. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The Use Specific Standard listed under General Note 3 is not correct and should be 4.9.7.B.6. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – The lot coverage calculation should show the square footage of the buildings and vehicle use area. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for 1st Street, right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Per UDC Article 7.4.3.G When the calculation of required motor vehicle and bicycle parking spaces results in a fractional number, a fraction of one-half or more is adjusted to the next higher whole number, and a fraction of less than one-half is adjusted to the next lower whole number. That said the required number should be 14. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation should include the number of accessible spaces required and provided. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a standard vehicle parking space detail. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per 2018 IBC Chapter 11 Section 1106.5 for every six of fraction of six accessible parking spaces, at least one shall be a van accessible parking space. The proposed accessible space does not meet the requirements of the ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502 for a van accessible space. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The wheel stop location dimension does not meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a mounting height for the proposed accessible parking space signage. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, Multifamily Dwellings and Group Dwelling, Long-Term bicycle parking is required at 0.10 spaces per bedroom. Minimum requirement is 2 spaces. Per :UDC Article 7.4.9.D.2.a allows for the Long-Term bicycle parking to be inside the residential units. Provide a note stating that the Long-Term bicycle parking will be provided in each unit. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate on detail 4 sheet 2 how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e, 7.4.9.B.2.f are met. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – By definition this site is considered Developing Area, see UDC Article 11.4.5. Street perimeter yard setbacks are based on UDC Article 6.4.5.C.1.a Within established areas, the minimum required front street perimeter yard is 20 feet or one and one-half the height of the proposed wall (H), measured from the street property line, whichever is greater, up to a maximum of 90 feet. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. Based on the top of parapet height provided 22’ requires a street perimeter yard setback of 33’-0”. Review UDC Article UDC Article 6.4.5.B.4 and provide the correct street perimeter yard setback. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Per UDC TABLE 6.3-2.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 ZONES, R-3 Zone, Nonres Use to a Res or Nonres zone the required perimeter yard setback is 10' or ¾(H) = Height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two. Based on a wall height of 22’ the required perimeter yard setback to the north and south & east property line is 16’-6”, proposed is 15’-0”. A Design Development Option (DDO) must be submitted and approved to reduce the required setback, DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan and shall be submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Until the height is provided for the storage perimeter yard setback requires cannot verified. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage, height specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – It does not appear that the require side out to the street, see TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A, meets the requirement of TSM Section 7-01.4.3.A. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – Demonstrate how mail service will be provided to the site. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – If applicable indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 02/11/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Approved. See the Documents section of PRO for the following: TEP Facilities Map, TEP redline utility page, and TEP approval letter, 02.09.22. |
| 02/11/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: AZ Loft Living ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0310 Address: 3415 E 1st Zoning: R-3 Existing Use: vacant land Proposed Use: Multi-family residential TRANSMITTAL DATE: DUE DATE: COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 2. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 3. Please label the existing right of way for 1st UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 4. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements, and it is required to meet all. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2. 5. An irrigation plan and specifications are required per UDC Administration Manual 2-10.4.2.C and Technical Standards Manual Section 4-01.4.2, Irrigation Standards. 6. Please add/call out soil moisture gauge/tensiometers and rain shut-off device on irrigation plans and details. UDC Tech Standards 4.01-2.A. 7. Please indicate the installation of a private submeter if a separate irrigation meter is not being provided. UDC Technical Standards 4-01.6.1.A.1. 8. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. 9. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways. 10. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 2-10-4.2.A.4., please be specific. 11. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required. Multi-family projects are commercial developments. UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. 12. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf 13. Grading, hydrology, and landscape plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. UDC 7.6.6.C.2. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match. 14. Identify the point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow. 15. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on water harvesting or landscape plans. 16. Indicate basin inlets/outlets on both landscape and water harvesting plans. Provide spot elevations. 17. An approved Native Plant Preservation Plan Sections 7.7.4 is required or a request for an exception from the Native Plant Preservation requirements in accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 & .4 of the Unified Development Code (UDC) and Admin. Manual Section 2-11.0.0 is required prior to Grading Plan approval. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/15/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. General note # 6: Please provide area both in SF and acre. 2. For All sheets - Please reserve 3"x5" block lower right quadrant for approval stamp. 3. General note #10: missing words. After the words " ...accordance with Section10-01.5.0" please add the words ", Sight Visibility," as shown in Administrative Manual Section 2-06.4.0 - 4.7 General Notes, C. Street and Road Notes # 2. 4. Please provide basis of bearing and basis of elevation on the cover sheet. 5. Please provide a summary of the provided waste stream calculation on this sheet and a reference note to see attach detail calculation sheets. 6. Please provide a separate drainage report discussing the existing versus proposed drainage patterns. Also using Low Impact Development design and water harvesting provide balanced basin detention and first flush retention. The newly adopted Detention/Retention Manual can be found: https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-final-201406-manual.pdf With edits to the manual found: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf Sheet 2 7. Site Plan Keynote #12: Please provide standard parking detail and detail number. 8. Site Plan Keynote #9: Please clarify if 2" asphalt over 4" ABC and 6" compact subgrade pavement was recommended by geotechnical engineer. Detail 7 calls out 3" asphalt over 6" ABC. 9. Please label APN for the adjacent properties (i.e. Lot 6). 10. Location of wheel stops should be 2.5' from sidewalk to prevent obstruction of vehicle overhang. Having the wheel stops set back 3' does not provide adequate stall depth. Please revise on plan and on detail. Sheet 3 11. Please provide basis ground elevation per AM 2-06.4.0 4.8 Existing Site Condition. Please also label basis of bearing and basis of elevation on plan. 12. Please add "SW" to legend abbreviation list. 13. Please provide slope for ADA ramp. 14. Please label saw cut line and provide additional existing elevation at saw cut line. 15. Please check TC elevation 2475.05 in front of Unit 2. It is higher than SW elevation 2474.95. 16. Please check all proposed elevation and surface flow slope. Spot check show slope is 0.15% to 0.18%, which is much smaller than call out at 0.5% or 0.65%. 17. Please check sidewalk elevation and provide cross slope between unit 2 and unit 3 to make sure surface water flow away from unit 2. 18. Provide detail number and reference location on plan for the curb opening detail. 19. Southeast corner has G=2474.45 next to CO=2474.15. This 0% slope will result in ponding. Please revise grading and add a detail callout for all curb openings. 20. Please identify entrance concrete walks to units and provide spot elevations (typ). 21. Label side slope ratios for slopes along west of buildings. 22. Describe how the area to the east of unit 6 drains. 23. The new contour (2474) creates a pond at entrance. Please revise. 24. Add additional spot elevations to west landscaping area near entrance. Does this area overflow to street? 25. Please indicate any existing 100 YR floodplain or remove from legend. 26. Match Legend lineweights and linetypes and hatch scales to those shown on plan. (i.e. boundary line, sidewalk, existing contours) 27. Slope away from trash enclosure should be minimum 2%. Sheet 4 28. Please label existing Sewer MH elevations in plan. 29. Please label and clarify how utility trench are being backfill and joint with existing asphalt. Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/17/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | (The PLAN mentioned below can be viewed in the "Documents" section of PRO: "Pima Co Addressing review comments, first submittal, 02.14.22") Email from: <Addressing@pima.gov> To: CDRC Mon 2/14/2022 5:20 PM AZ Loft, 1st Submittal Review: DP21-0310 is returned for corrections. Please see plan for comments. Thank you Nicholas Jordan, Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701, (520) 724-9623 |
| 02/25/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | Email from: David.Stiffey@TucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Fri 2/25/2022 2:53 PM Comments: 1. Sheet C1.2- at the entryway/ driveway entrance, Curb returns in the right of way on a local street must have an 18 Ft. radius. 2. Sheet C1.2- New 5 Ft wide sidewalk along entire property frontage 3. Sheet C1.2- Curb access ramps will need to be installed at the returns of the driveway entrance 4. Sheet C1.2- New curb shall be according to P.A.G. standard 209 5. Sheet C1.2- Any existing curb removed needs to be replaced with P.A.G. standard 209 curb 6. Sheet C1.2- Trash enclosure access off the street needs to be a standard P.A.G. 206 driveway apron David Stiffey City of Tucson Dept. of Transportation & Mobility |
| 02/25/2022 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Gates accross fire department access roads shall be 20' wide. You show gates that are 12' this will not be approved. Gates on access roads will also require a KNOX Key Switch. Buildings shall have fire sprinklers installed so please note that on your DP and show that the water meters have been adjusted to meet the TW requirements for adding fire sprinklers. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 |
| 03/16/2022 | FRANK PODGORSKI | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD DATE | Approved | The property at 3415 E 1st St is not located within a Historic Preservation Zone or a National Register historic district. No historic review is required. Additionally, there do not appear to be any archaeological sites in the vicinity, so a survey or monitor is not necessary for the proposed work. |
| 03/18/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: George Zazueta Fri 3/18/2022 2:53 PM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP21-0310 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading - AZ Loft Living DP. Multifamily development. 3415 E 1ST ST FEE BALANCE: $ 2,065.72 Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW category fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENTS If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL and include: 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff - Select "PLANS" for all documents for quicker downloading of your documents on our end Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 03/18/2022 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Needs Review |