Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0302
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/13/2022 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Completed | See Zoning comments. |
| 02/09/2022 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide results of infiltration tests to demonstrate the basin will dispose of retained volume in less than 24 hours. Include a derating factor of 2 as required by the floodplain regulations. 2. The grading plan and water harvesting plan do not meet the requirements of the water harvesting ordinance and technical standard. a. The catchment areas must provide water to the infiltration areas. Revise the grading to direct runoff to the landscape infiltration areas to the maximum extent possible. b. Catchment areas in the water harvesting table can only count the areas that are directed to the landscape infiltration areas. c. Clearly show the areas in each catchment area and the areas of effective infiltration and water harvesting. d. UDC section 7.6.6.C requires the use of all runoff to supplement irrigation. Show how this is attained. e. Provide a planting inventory or some other mechanism so we can confirm the canopy areas for each water harvesting infiltration area. Ensure all on-site landscape areas are accounted in the canopy area. f. Show rooftop drainage patterns and show how they are incorporated into the water harvesting calculations. g. Water harvesting areas should be depressed between 6 and 9 inches. These areas can be counted toward first flush retention requirements. 3. Check throughout the SWPPP to ensure all elements are specific to this site. 4. Ensure all lettering is legible and doesn't block other lettering. 5. Provide construction details for the outfall structure at the northeast property corner. 6. Provide written permission from Sierra Morado Community Association for grading onto their property. The permission must be notarized and recorded before approval of the DP. 7. Provide construction details for all outlets to Mesquite Ranch Wash. Demonstrate adequate erosion protection for each outlet. Show the interaction of the flow lines with the existing grades. Clearly label estimated discharge quantities at each discharge location. 8. Add a note that a floodplain use permit is required for this project. Apply for a floodplain use permit before the DP is issued. Loren Makus, EIT loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/14/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits to: lisa bowers Mon 2/14/2022 8:43 AM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP21-0302 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/Swppp - TMC Rincon Hospital. Lots 11 thru 15, and 17. Fee Balance: $0 (zero) YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL and include: 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for your Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff - Select "PLANS" for documents for quicker downloading of your documents on our end Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 11/12/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 11/12/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 11/12/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/12/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 12/02/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | (The TEP FACILITIES MAP mentioned and the TEP APPROVAL LETTER shown below can be viewed in the Documents section of PRO) December 02, 2021 SUBJECT: TMC Rincon Hospital, DP21-0302 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 12th, 2021. There do not appear to be any conflicts. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Bianca Maubach New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (OH 204) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-307-3864 Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area Designer Chuck Leon at (520) 400-6133. Sincerely, Conor Mahoney, Office Support Assistant Design/Build |
| 12/07/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | A 6-inch building sewer is shown crossing under the east end of the 4-story and the 1-story buildings. The building sewer has with a total length of 348-feet between the cleanout South of the buildings and the manhole North of the buildings. What is the material for the sewer? Are there any connections under the buildings? How are intermediate cleanouts to be installed for the pipe below the buildings? Reference: Sections 702 and 708, IPC 2018. |
| 12/08/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: TMC Rincon Hospital Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0302 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 8, 2021 DUE DATE: December 9, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is November 07, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0302, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – General Note 3 remove the reference to “UDC SECTION 4.9.13.K” as it is not applicable, see PAD-12 Section E-2. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Sheet 5 there is a “45’ CURB OPENING” called out under Keynote 16, demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 are met. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Sheet 17 parking details the location dimension for the wheel stops is not correct. Review UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3 and provide the correct dimension. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate on the plan/detail how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e are met 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Bicycle Rack Layout detail sheet 32 the 2’-4” dimension shown from the end of rack to the “BUIDING FAÇADE VERTICAL ELEMENT” is not correct. Review UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.g and provide the correct dimension. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide a breakdown on how the bicycle parking was calculated it does not appear to be correct. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage height and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.A provide the required sidewalk 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provide a general note stating all signs require a separate permit. 11. COMMENT: Provide documentation from that the requirements of PAD-12 Section C-12 have been complied with. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 12/09/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | Email from: David.Stiffey@Tucsonaz.gov To: CDRC Thu 12/9/2021 1:40 PM One Comment. The address is incorrect. The Houghton address is closer to the 5600 block. Actually it is possible that the number is supposed to be a Drexel number. The Drexel address at that point is, 10350 E. Drexel. David Stiffey City of Tucson |
| 12/09/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC Wed 12/8/2021 5:31 PM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 631-2030 |
| 12/10/2021 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | (The ATTACHED PDF mentioned below can be viewed in the "Documents" section of PRO: "Pima Co Addressing, review comments, first submittal") Email from: <Addressing@pima.gov> To: CDRC Wed 12/8/2021 11:32 AM TMC Rincon Hospital, 1st Submittal Review: DP21-0302 is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. Addressing’s comments are provided in the attached pdf. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 12/10/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: TMC Rincon H ACTIVITY NO: Dp21-302 Address: 10340 S Houghton Rd Zoning: PAD-12 Existing Use: Undisturbed Sonoran desert Proposed Use: Medical facilities TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 10, 2021 DUE DATE: December 9, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. Please label the existing and future rights of way for Drexel Rd. UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 2. Integrate tree planting islands, diamonds, tree grates or other acceptable solution into the parking areas, specifically along Health Campus Ring Road, and any rows of parking exceeding 5-6 spaces. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to mitigate the heat and glare radiated by the built environment, UDC 7.6.1.A.3. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a., UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2. 3. Desert Willow and Willow Acacia are not considered canopy trees, please provide canopy trees in all parking areas. 4. Platanus wrightii is not on the ADWR Tucson Active Management Area plant list, please select a more drought tolerant species. 5. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 2-10-4.2.A.4., please be specific. 6. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf 7. Grading, hydrology, and landscape plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. UDC 7.6.6.C.2. The landscape and grading plans must match. 8. Identify the point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow. 9. Retention/detention basins should be designed naturally and organically, whenever practicable. 10. Add the following note to the Native Plant Preservation Plan - The site developer must include language in all contracts with contractors about the importance of staying out of all areas and away from all individual Protected Native Plants to be preserved-in-place. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/15/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Please provide a sheet that clearly shows the fire department aerial access and fire department site access. Show the locations of the fire hydrants and the FDC location on thi sheet. Provide commenatry on the fire department no parking signs for the aerial access lane. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis 520-837-7033 Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/27/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REVIEW | Approved | Email from: Bea Paulus, Eric Latto To: CDRC Mon 12/27/2021 9:01 AM Sun Tran has no conflicts at that location. We are fine to proceed. Thank you. Sun Tran / Transit City of Tucson |