Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP21-0299
Parcel: 112054070

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP21-0299
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/28/2022 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change To the extent practicable, maximize water harvesting for all landscape areas including any new tree wells.
Loren Makus
loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov
01/31/2022 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Email from: COTDSDPermits
to: lisa bowers
Mon 1/31/2022 10:37 AM

REVIEW NOTICE
Returned for Corrections: DP21-0299

DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading - Doughbird/Flower Child Restaurant.

FEE BALANCE: $ 1,206.50
Pay at a minimum, the REVIEW category fees.
A payment is required before your next submittal.
ONLINE PAYMENT
If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees
1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees
2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000
(not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed)
3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank
4- "Continue"
5- In the Pay column - check the boxes
6- "Continue"

YOUR NEXT STEPS
1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.)
- Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections
- Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS
- Documents section - click on VIEW

2. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL and include:
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments)
2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made)
3) Any other documents requested by review staff

Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter

FILEDROP for your Resubmittal
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
- Select "Existing Application"
- In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff
- Select "PLANS" for documents for quicker downloading of your documents on our end


Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist

City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services
Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov
11/12/2021 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
12/01/2021 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Doughbird/Flower Child
Development Package (1st Review)
DP21-0299

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 1, 2021

DUE DATE: December 7, 2021

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is November 02, 2022.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0299, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a detail for the new angles vehicle parking spaces shown along the south side of the proposed building. This detail shall include the “A” Parking angle, “C” Space width, & “E” Curb length. Also include a location dimension for the proposed wheel stops.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a wheel stop location dimension for the wheel stops shown on the typical parking space details.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – On the parking space details there are two angled dimensions, 18.5’ & 13’, clarify what these dimensions are for.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide the number required and provide for the vehicle parking spaces for the entire site.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – It does not appear that the percentage of “FOOD SERVICE” use shown under General Note 17 is correct. Zoning calculation shows 32,251 SF – Food Service for a 16.8%.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The short-term bicycle parking location does not meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.C.2.a to the primary building entrance.


8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – As Campbell is designated on the COT MS&R map with a 120’ future right-of-way (ROW) show the location of the future curb on the plan. Zoning acknowledges that it appears that the ROW is at full width for the east side of Campbell.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – As some type of cross access is proposed provide a copy of the recorded agreement/easement with your next submittal.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – All street designed on the COT MS&R map are considered Developing Area for street perimeter yard setback purposes, see UDC Article 11.4.6 definition of Established Area Setback. That said the setbacks listed under General Note 16 for the West (Street) is not correct and should be based on UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1 ADT of 1,000 or greater. Also, once the future curb is shown, see comment 8 provide the correct setback dimension on sheet 3.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – As this site is not a stand-alone site from the overall shopping center demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B are met from the proposed building to the existing buildings on site.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – The proposed “NEW WALL/FENCE” called out under Keynote 28 appears to have columns, provide sidewalk width dimensions that clearly show how wide the proposed sidewalks are along the north & west side of the patio shown along the northwest side of the proposed building and the south and west side of the patio shown along southwest side of the proposed building. It appears that at a minimum wheel stops will be required for all of the parking spaces shown along the west side of the proposed building.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Based on the spot elevations provided it appears that the proposed access ramp for the southern most accessible access aisle will not work as shown on the plan. It appears that

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov.

To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
12/02/2021 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
12/03/2021 AWARNER1 LANDSCAPE REVIEW Needs Review PROJECT: Doughbird/Flower Child
ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0299
Address: 2960 N. Cambell Rd
Zoning: C-1
Existing Use: Food service
Proposed Use: Food service

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 3, 2021
DUE DATE: December 7, 2021
COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed.
This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting.

1. 7.6 Landscaping and Screening
The Unified Development Code (UDC) requires all new development or an expansion of greater than 25% of an existing development submit a landscape plan, UDC 7.6.2. Preparation of the landscape plan shall adhere to UDC 7.6.4. and Administrative Manual 2-10.

The parking area requires redesign to incorporate trees to maximize shade over asphalt. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.1.B.1, UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 and UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a.

2. A 10’ minimum landscape border is required along Campbell Ave.

3. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening.

4. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design.
https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf

5. Grading, hydrology, and landscape plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. UDC 7.6.6.C.2. The landscape and grading plans must match.

6. Identify the point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow.

7. Identify curb inlets to landscape areas.

8. Retention/detention basins should be designed naturally and organically, whenever practicable.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package

YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
Select "Existing Application"
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to
the reviewer's Requires changes comments)
2) Plan Set (or individual sheets)
3) Any other items requested by review staff

If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov
12/07/2021 JPEELDA1 FIRE REVIEW Reqs Change FDC shall be located on the street side. Drawings show that the connection will end up in the back of the building.

Questions:
Jennifer.Peel-Davis@tucsonaz.gov
520-837-7033
Jennifer Peel-Davis