Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0297
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/11/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Show screen for the 95 gal APC Recycle Bin as per Technical Standards Manual section 8-01.4.0.C 2. Per C9-21-17 Preliminary Zoning Condition 18 - The drainage and water harvesting plan for the site will be designed as from the undeveloped state. Retention and balanced basin detention is required. Please revise the drainage statement/report to use vacant land for the pre-existing conditions and show balanced basin and first flush retention calculations as per new detention/retention manual https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/codes-plans. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/12/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits to: lisa bowers Wed 1/12/2022 12:57 PM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP21-0297 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading - Brakemasters FEE BALANCE: $ 2,216.82 ONLINE PAYMENT If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL and include: 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for your Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) |
| 11/10/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | (The TEP FACILITIES MAP, TEP REDLINE, and TEP REVIEW COMMENTS, FIRST SUBMITTAL, 12.22.21 can be viewed in the Documents section of PRO) Email from: Design Admins <DesignAdmins@tep.com> To: CDRC Wed 12/22/2021 3:53 PM Attached is our response letter for Brakemasters, DP21-0297. Thank you, Conor Mahoney, Design Administrator Desk: (520) 918-8388 Cell: (520) 404-8437 TEP |
| 11/10/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 11/10/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 11/10/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/10/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 11/24/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC Wed 11/24/2021 12:00 PM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 631-2030 |
| 11/30/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Brake Masters – Grant & Swan Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0297 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 30, 2021 DUE DATE: December 03, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 31, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0297, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Demonstrate that the PAAL along the east side of the building meets the minimum 24’ along with a 4” pedestrian refuge. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Demonstrate that the access lane along the west side of the building meets the minimum 20’ along with a 4” pedestrian refuge. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.K access from an alley is not allowed. A Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4.c are met for the back-u spur shown at the south end of the southern parking area. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide an access lane width dimension from the curb that bumps out around the power pole called out under Keynote 6, to the building. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b are met along the west side of the access lane shown along the west side of the building and along the south side of the access lane shown along the south side of the building. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The short-term bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, COMMERCIAL USE GROUP, 2 spaces are required, there is no 5,000 ratio for the use. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.g are met for the short-term bicycle parking. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – It appears that the proposed accessible parking signs encroach into the 2’-6” vehicle overhang. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Demonstrate that a 4’ wide pedestrian refuge is provided along east & west side of the building along the vehicle access doors. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Provide the required 4’-0” sidewalk along the west side of the building north of the vehicle access doors, see TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Provide the required 4’-0” sidewalk along the south side of the building, see TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 12/01/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 12/03/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/03/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Email from: David Stiffey To: CDRC Fri 12/3/2021 11:33 AM No Comment. |
| 12/06/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | The plans only show one existing hydrant that exceeds the 400' allowed. Building will require a fire sprinkler underground line since the hydrant is too far away and or the owner shall install a new hydrant within the 400' Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis 520-837-7033 Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/14/2021 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Completed |