Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0292
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/12/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Stephen Litsas cc: Erin Harris Wed 1/12/2022 1:44 PM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP21-0292 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading: Self Storage - Tucson. Storage units, RV storage stalls, office. 5642 S ALVERNON WY Fee Balance: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL and include: 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for your Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 01/12/2022 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Needs Review | To Applicant: Addressing review fee is due. Please contact Addressing to pay the fee. They will then start the review. Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson |
| 11/19/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/19/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REVIEW | Approved | Email from: Bea Paulus (Suntran/Transit) To: CDRC Fri 11/19/2021 9:32 AM This address is on Alvernon @ Drexel NW. The nearest bus stops are on Drexel @ Rex Strav SE & Benson Hwy @ Drexel NW. There does not appear to be any notable conflicts for Sun Tran. The buses do not travel on that part of Alvernon or Drexel. Thank you. Bea Paulus, Programs & Projects Manager Sun Tran, 520-206-8826 bea.paulus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/06/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. The record number for this project is DP21-0292. Please add to all sheets. 2. Please revise vicinity map per content requirements AM 2-06.40. This includes showing at a 3"=1' mile scale, calling out site as "This Project", adding legal description, section, township, and range, centering the project within one square mile, and calling out adjacent properties and watercourses. 3. Missing professional engineer stamp on all sheets. 4. Please show box measuring 3"x5". 5. Missing Sheet X of Y (Y=total number of sheets) lower right corner of sheet on all the sheets. Please revise. 6. Correct spelling of "TUCSON" in lower right corner. Sheet 2 7. Per AM 2-06.4.7, please provide the gross area of the site and area of disturbance, existing use and proposed use, and provide calculation for coverage floor and use area over gross area. 8. Please provide 3"x5" box on the succeeding sheets. 9. City of Tucson GIS map shows the site has two zoning (C-2 & R-1). Please provide documentation for I-2 zoning and if rezoning was filed provide case number. Sheet 3 10. No smaller than scale 1"=50' on all plan sheets, please revise. 11. Please add location map and identify all receiving waters within 1/4 mile of the facility as well as add location and registration numbers of on-site drywells and drywells on adjacent properties that have the potential to receive stormwater from the site, if any. Sheet 4 12. Please indicate splash pads at the outlet of all culverts. Sheet 5 13. Please expand legend to include all line types and symbols shown on the plan (sheets C5 & C6). 14. A separate right-of-way permit is required for work within public right-of-way. (sheets C5 & C6). 15. Add Right of Way (ROW) information, please add dimensions, public or private street (sheets C5 & C6). 16. Lot line adjustment, please add case number. 17. Add all current parcel numbers (sheets C5 & C6). Sheet 8 18. Please call out AC pavement edge conditions (vertical curb, wedge, etc.). Sheet 9 19. Please show Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT) on all driveway approaches. 20. Please provide parking and loading space calculations and bicycle parking calculations. 21. Please show perimeter info, bearing and distances. 22. For all vehicle access lanes, please show arrows to indicate two-way or one-way. Please check for two-way access lane with storage use has a minimum width of 30 ft (typ). 23. Please indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle movement. 24. Add height (or max) of the buildings (typ). 25. All streets, please indicate public or private with dimensions. 26. Indicate location of mailbox. Sheet 11 27. Pavement and landscape slope down to the north and west adjacent properties with no gutter or swale at the top and toe of slope. Please indicate in legend what ME labels represent. No proposed curb at pavement edge. Please clarify. 28. Please clarify grade break location near the bottom of this sheet. 29. Please provide section detail of the access lane. 30. Plans do not adequately provide cross-sections or details regarding drainage crossing pavements onto earthen slopes. Consider additional drainage control measures. Sheet 12 31. For all proposed sediment basins, please indicate side slopes, provide section with 100-year ponding limits and show WSEL. 32. Sidewalk slope 2% max. please clarify. 33. What does double line in the east represent? Is it FL along a curb? If so, please indicate EP in addition to FL and add curb labels. (Typical) 34. Please include grade break location callouts. Sheet 15 35. Provide cross-section for area between Alvernon and parking stalls (typ). 36. Please revise 0% slope shown on plans. Sheet 16 37. Please orient details the north pointing up, down or left only. Sheet 17 38. Please show sewer flow arrow direction. SWPPP Comments: 1. See development package SWPPP comments and duplicate in SWPPP booklet. Drainage Report Comments: Page 3 1. Section 2.3 - Identify location of detention requirements summary, missing end of sentence. Page 5 2. Table 4 - Proposed Basin C Q100 lists required detention as 123cfs. Please review and revise as necessary. 3. Section 2.3 - Please add description and supporting documentation for area grate sizing (i.e. clogging factor, factor of safety, weir/orifice calculations, etc). Page 30 4. Stormdrain Calcs - With higher stormdrain outlet velocities, will there be outlet protection in basin? If so, provide riprap calculations and riprap sizing for SD pipe outlet. Appendix B 5. Appendix B - Supporting HEC-HMS results documentation not found in Appendix. Please review and add as necessary. 6. Appendix B - Will review curb cut and inlet spillway calculations in next submittal, as indicated in report. Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/08/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | Email from: David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov To: CDRC Wed 12/8/2021 11:09 AM 1. Sheet C9 - please provide a "site Keynote" for concrete curb. Curb returns at entryway off of Alvernon Hwy. Type of curb and P.A.G. standard 209 2. Sheet C9 & Sheet C10 - please provide a note for sidewalk width. Sidewalk needs to be 6 Ft. wide according to COT Construction Manual, 10-01.4.1. (On sheets C9 and C10, next to the key note square, there is a 6.0’ but it is uncertain if that pertains to the sidewalk width. If that figure corresponds with sidewalk width, please make that clear.) David Stiffey City of Tucson |
| 12/15/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Self Storage – 5642 S Alvernon Way Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0292 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 15, 2021 DUE DATE: December 17, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is November 09, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on all sheets. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0292, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map shall cover approximately one square mile, and be drawn at a minimum scale of three-inch equals one mile. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – The section, township, and range & section corners will be labeled on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – The zoning listed under “CITY OF TUCSON ZONING NOTE” 1 is not correct. Also clarify why there are two (2) sets of CITY OF TUCSON ZONING NOTEs. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 – Provide a general note listing the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The Use Specific Standards listed under “CITY OF TUCSON ZONING NOTE” 3 are not correct./ Review UDC TABLE 4.8-4: PERMITTED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE ZONES, C-2 Zone, Storage Use Group With Land Use Class/Type: Personal Storage, C-2 and provide the correct Use Specific Standards. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Provide a general note stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R).” 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for Alvernon and Felix, right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – As this site is made up of 3 parcels a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo request form with the next submittal. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. Provide the zoning for the parcels east of Alvernon and south of Felix. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 – As right-of-way dimensions were not provide per standard 2-06.4.8.C above, the requirements of SVT’s cannot be determined but it does not appear that Alvernon is at full width and may require that future SVT’s be shown. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Table 7.4.6-2: MOTOR VEHICLE USE AREA DIMENSIONS CONTINUED the minimum access lane and PAAL width for Storage Use Development is 30 feet. Demonstrate on the plan that this requirement is met. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Near the southeast corner of building 2 there is a Keynote 18 that points to nothing but calls out bollards. It appears the bollard encroach into the PAAL. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a vehicle parking space calculation on the plan. This calculation shall provide the ratio used, number required & provided. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a typical vehicle parking space detail for both standard and accessible spaces. This detail shall provide all required dimensions. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines , to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping , walls, or buildings , overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas , and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Demonstrate on the plan how this requirement is met for: a. East of the “DIVE UP STORAGE” along the east property line. b. South of the “DIVE UP STORAGE” along the south property line. c. West of the “DIVE UP STORAGE” along the west property line, west of building 2. d. West of the “DIVE UP STORAGE” near the northwest corner of the property. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – Review UDC Article 7.5.5 and provide a loading space calculation on the plan and clearly show where the required loading spaces are at on the plan. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short-term bicycle parking space calculation on the plan, clearly show where the required short-term bicycle parking is located and provide a detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9 are met. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – As right-of-way dimensions were not provide per standard 2-06.4.8.C above, the requirements for future right-of-way cannot be determined. If the right-of-way is not a full width show the future right-of-way line, curb & sidewalk on the plan and demonstrate on the plan that the proposed development meets develop standards based on the future right-of-way. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – As building heights were not provided street perimeter yard setbacks cannot be determined. Street perimeter yard setbacks are based on UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1. For Alvernon the setback is measured from back of curb or future curb, great of the two, and for Felix the setback is measured to the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height of all structures within the footprint. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Sections 7-01.3.3.A & 7-01.4.1.A at least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B a sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. Demonstrate that this requirement is met for all areas of the site. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.C A sidewalk is required adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene. Demonstrate that this requirement is met for all areas of the site. 26. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R- Per TSM Sections 7-01.3.3.B the areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. Demonstrate that this requirement is met for all areas of the site. 27. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also, provide a general note stating all signage requires separate permits. As this development was lacking substantial calculations and information additional comments maybe forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 12/16/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 12/23/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Self Storage ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0292 Address: 5642 S ALVERNON WY Zoning: C-2 Existing Use: undisturbed Sonoran desert Proposed Use: Self Storage TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 22, 2021 DUE DATE: December 17, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. Per rezoning conditions C9-19-19; A minimum six (6) foot high masonry wall shall be constructed adjacent to residentially-zoned properties to the north and west of the rezoning site. Six (6) inch wide masonry block or greater shall be used for perimeter walls. All walls visible from a public right-of-way are to be graffiti-resistant and incorporate one (1) or more visually appealing design treatments, such as the use of two (2) or more decorative materials like stucco, tile, stone, or brick; a visually interesting design on the wall surface; varied wall alignments, (jog, curve, notch, setback, etc.); and/or trees and shrubs in voids created by the wall variations. 2. Please provide details for the required wall and show wall location on landscape plans. 3. The north and west boundaries do require an interior border adjacent to residential uses. UDC 7.6.4 4. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. Mitigation trees are in addition to landscape border and parking landscape requirements, UDC 7.7.3.C. 5. There are no plant container sizes or GPH listed on legend, please revise. 6. Please label the existing and future rights of way for Alvernon Way and Felix Blvd. UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 7. Please add/call out soil moisture gauge/tensiometers and rain shut-off device on irrigation plans and details. UDC Tech Standards 4.01-2.A. 8. Native Plant Preservation plans require a landscape architect stamp. 9. Please identify all the hatch patterns in the legend on all the plans for clarity. 10. Please add a detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. 11. Per Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.D, provide page/detail reference to civil drawings/details that show bike racks, walkways, and screening/retaining walls on landscape plans. See civil drawing is not sufficient. 12. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf 13. Grading, hydrology, and landscape plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. UDC 7.6.6.C.2. The landscape, water harvesting, and grading plans must match. 14. Identify the point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow. 15. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on water harvesting or landscape plans. 16. Indicate basin inlets/outlets on both landscape and water harvesting plans. Provide spot elevations. 17. Retention/detention basins should be designed naturally and organically, whenever practicable. Rectangles and squares are not organic shapes. 18. On the Mitigation/Credit calculations, the inventoried number should be the total # of plants, so they can’t be the same as the Viable column. 19. Please note that smaller caliper trees can used for TOS, have greater survivability, and may be counted towards larger caliper tree quantities. 20. Add these notes please, UDC 7.7.5 On- monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre. The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in UDC Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file. 21. Add these notes, UDC 7.7.6 The monitor is responsible for an assessment of the condition of the site’s plants one year after the final inspection has been performed on the site. The monitor shall visit the site and prepare a report on plant status, including general plant condition, the identification of plants under stress and the appropriate method to relieve the stress, and recommendations for replacement of plants that are dead or dying. Dead or dying plants must be replaced with the same size plant at a one-to-one ratio of like genus and species. Copies of the report must be submitted to the site owner/developer and to PDSD. The owner must respond to the plant needs as outlined in the status report within six months of report submittal or within a shorter period if required to improve the health of stressed plants and prevent plant loss. 22. Add the following note to the Native Plant Preservation Plan - The site developer must include language in all contracts with contractors about the importance of staying out of all areas and away from all individual Protected Native Plants to be preserved-in-place. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/29/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Plans shall show the existing and new fire hydrant locations Plans shall show width of access lanes Plans shall show if the buidling will require fire department access and if required please show the access lane on the drawings Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 |