Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP21-0284
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/03/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/03/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 11/03/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 11/03/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 11/09/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. Please provide a brief legal description within the title block including township section and range 2. Please provide two 3"x5" blank spaces on the title sheet for approval stamps. All other sheets only require one space. 3. Please include in title: - Common Areas & Type - Public or Private streets 4. Please include all line types and symbols used throughout the plan set in the legend. 5. Please identify scale of Location Map (1" = 3 mi). 6. Please identify all street names on project overview, including proposed. Identify as private or public. (typ) 7. Please update general notes to include note "All new public roads within and adjacent to this project will be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans will be submitted to the City Engineer's Office for review and approval." Sheet 4 8. Please label all common areas, including basins, and clearly show and label the division between common areas. 9. Please show all existing property lines, easements, and right of ways. 10. Please indicate the location and type of all signs. 11. Please provide sight visibility triangles at the intersection of the dead-end road. 12. The 32' RW section does not meet minimum pavement width requirements. Please call out bollards at the north end of the 32' RW section. 13. Verify the EP radii at the intersection of the dead-end road. Should be 25' but is called out as an offset of the 25' RW radii Sheet 5 14. Please identify off-site existing drainage patterns adjacent to the site. 15. Are the thick lines off site behind the lots proposed contours? Please label. Is off-site grading proposed? 16. Please show drainage pattern behind lots 1, 18-20 to show that lot drainage is not impacting adjacent lots. 17. Please show drainage pattern behind lots 23-27 to show that lot drainage is not impacting adjacent lots. 18. Clearly show grading of the recreation area within the basin. (adjacent slopes and finish pad elevation) 19. Please add slope label in the main proposed street to the west of Bonanza Ave. 20. Please show drainage pattern at the end of the dead-end street and beyond. Where are flows discharging to after the rip rap? Please label the rip rap. 21. Please show drainage pattern to the north of the basin outlet. Show that drainage does not impact adjacent lots. 22. Please label the 100yr WSEL in the basin 23. Identify what these lines are. Sheet 6 24. The sewer main looks to be existing because it is in gray scale. Please only use gray scale for existing elements. Please use consistent line types throughout the set and match legend 25. Please provide flow arrows at all sewer manhole locations. 26. Please check that all construction notes are consistent and accurate. The keynote 8 between lots 46 and 47 appears to point to a fire hydrant. If this is correct, please distinguish the two types. 27. Please show all easements (including public drainage) on the site plan as well. Please clearly show the boundaries of easements, and label easements as existing or proposed. Sheet 7 28. Please show the location of weep holes in detail 5. Note that locations are per plan. 29. Please add max height of screen walls and design standard in detail 5. 30. Please label all relevant design elevations on details 7 and 8 31. Please add a detail showing building setbacks. 32. Where is section A-A referencing? 33. Label side slopes in section A-A 34. Provide basin information to Section A-A SWPPP Comments: Site Plan (Sheet 40) 1. Please show discharge direction after flows leave the site. (typ) 2. Please show boundaries of the property and any locations where stockpiling may occur. 3. On the location map and site plan, please identify the direction and distance of the nearest surface water that may receive stormwater discharges, including ephemeral and intermittent streams, dry washes, and arroyos. If applicable, the SWPPP shall also identify and describe any wetlands near the site that could be disturbed or that could potentially receive discharges from disturbed areas of the site. Indicate if the receiving surface water is listed as impaired, not-attaining or an OAW. 4. Please provide a listing and description of permanent, post-construction stormwater management control measures that will be installed during the construction process to control pollutants in stormwater discharges after construction activities are complete (i.e. riprap splash pads) 5. Please match NOI and SWPPP notification location size in legend and plan 6. Existing contours in plan do not show contour label nor are they solid lines as shown in the legend. Please revise. Drainage Report Comments: Page 5 1. Section 1.3 #2 - no previous drainage studies were mentioned in the report. Please add discussion or remove this item 2. Section 1.4 - Please reference the map provided in appendix C. Add appendix reference to all figure references. Page 6 3. Section 2.0 #6. Reference 2 is an outdated manual. Please review the current adopted manual and revise the reference, making any changes as necessary. 4. Section 2 - Please state whether the project site is in a balance or critical basin and the requirements of such. Page 7 5. Section 4.2.1 - reword the sentence " The clogging factor does not used". Also explain why the clogging factor does not need to be used. Page 8 6. Table 3- Scupper length of 28' does not match the length of 38' shown on the plans. Please review and revise the report or plans as necessary. 7. Section 4.2.2 - Please state the flow depth and velocity for the design storm events in the text 8. Table 4 - Please provide Q(in) and show the post development flow as Q out. Also provide the retention volume provide in addition to the detention volume provided, and the water surface elevation. 9. Section 5 - Please provide a weir calculation showing elevation discharge that correlates to the basin outflow. 10. Section 5 - Please state the ultimate owner and responsibility for maintenance of the basin and provide a basin maintenance checklist and other info per City Manual Section 2.3.1.6C 11. Table 4 -Basin calculation show a difference number for the outflow. Please verify and revise as necessary. Page 12 12. NOAA Rainfall Value - The highlighted value used is the median value, not the Upper Bound which is 2.85. However, the City of Tucson uses 3 inches for their 100-year rainfall depth per Table 4.1. Please revise the hydrologic calculations, and detention/retentions requirement and analysis to reflect the correct rainfall value. Page 31 13. Scupper calculation - please provide the depth of flow for each and provide the equation used if not using Flowmaster as stated in the text. Page 32 14. Pavement Drainage Calculation (10 & 100-yr) - Please remove the gutter cross slope, local depression depth and width and throat incline angle as the typical section only show pavement and curb, not gutter. This will likely result in a greater width of spread and flow depth. Verification that the flow is contained within the curb is needed for a pavement section on grade. Page 39 15. Pavement normal depth flow calculation- Please revise calculation to a spread calculation as Manning's equation does not appropriately account for the hydraulic radius per Section 1.5 of the City manual. See equation 10.3 Page 41 16. Pavement cross section 100-yr - Please revise per previous comment. Also, not that the design discharge shown at capacity is less than the 41 cfs shown as the max along the road. Please recalculate and verify the road and ROW can handle the respective flows. Page 64 17. Pre-Development Drainage Map - Revise with updated hydrology calculations. Page 65 18. Post Development Map. Please add contours and labels. It is unclear what happens to runoff from slopes at rear of lots - describe this in the text. 19. Post Development Map - Please Add Q entering Bonanza Ave. 20. Figures - Please add a bar scale Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/16/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Plans shall show existing fire hydrants and new fire hydrants to be installed. We would need the average house size to determine the fire flow. Hydrants on a road shall be placed every 500'. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis 520-837-7033 Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/19/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Casas Del Cerrito Lots 1-49 FLD Subdivision Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0284 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 19, 2021 DUE DATE: November 26, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 21, 2022. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.2 – Submit the DP civil & landscape as a single multi-page pdf file. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0284, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B – Label all streets that abut the proposed site on the location map. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Label the scale of the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 – There appears to be a difference in the rezoning conditions provided on sheet 2 and on sheet 8. Clarify the difference and if the conditions on sheet 2 are not complete provide all conditions on sheet 2. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Revise General Note 4 to include “UDC ARTICLE 8.7.3”. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As it appears that a Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) will be required to modify the street cross section provide the TSMR case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified and if applicable any conditions of approval. The TSMR is a separate submittal and is submitted at: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp, using the Submission Type “Site Review”. The TSMR will need to be approved prior to approval of the DP. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for both Portia & Bonanza dimensioned width of paving, curbs, and sidewalks 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – All street perimeter yard setbacks listed under General Note 16 should be listed as 21’ or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The north and south perimeter yard setbacks listed under General Note 16 should be listed as 6’-0” or 2/3 the height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – As no actual building heights are known at this time remove all references to required building setback from sheet 4. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.U – As it does not appear that the rezoning conditions require site walls higher than 6’-0” and per UDC Article 6.6.2 the maximum height of a wall within the perimeter yard is 6’-0” revise detail 3 sheet 8 to read 6’-0” not 6’-0” MIN. 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 2-06.5.3 Additional Information The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable: 13. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.C – Provide a functional open space calculation on sheet 1 that meets the requirements of UDC Article 8.7.3.D. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.D – Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits; 15. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.E – An Architectural Variation plan will be required for this subdivision. Either provide the plan for review with the next submittal or provide a general note stating that the plan will be provided and approved prior issuance of any building permit for this subdivision. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.G.2 - Provide two copies of the protective covenants or common use agreements for any shared areas being established by easements over individually-owned property. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/19/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC Thu 11/18/2021 3:19 PM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 631-2030 |
| 11/22/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole for lot 49 is exactly 12" below the first floor elevation. A backwater valve is only allowed for buildings having a FFE below or less than 12" above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 11/24/2021 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | (The ATTACHED PDF mentioned below can be viewed in the "Documents" section of PRO: "Pima Co Addressing, review comments, first submittal, 11.23.21") Email from: Robin Freiman <Robin.Freiman@pima.gov> To: CDRC Tue 11/23/2021 3:23 PM Casas Del Cerrito, 1st Submittal Review: DP21-0284 is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 11/30/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Casas del Cerrito ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0284 Address: 3131 S Portia Zoning: R-1 Existing Use: undisturbed Sonoran desert Proposed Use: single family subdivision TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 30, 2021 DUE DATE: November 26, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Please label the existing and future rights of way for Bonanza and Portia Aves. UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 3. Please identify the dashed line in the front of the lots. 4. Please remove Senegalia greggii and Vachellia constricta as choices for street trees, their growing habit is more shrub like. 5. Provide calculations for the Flexible Lot Development Functional Open Space accordance with UDC Table 8.7.3-2. These calculations need to be on the civil drawings as well. 6. Maximize water harvesting in all landscape areas by depressing areas at least 6”. See IDC 8.7.3.H.3/4. 7. Add detail to show depressed landscape areas or indicate with notes. 8. Delete “Recommended” on detail 2, page 8. it is required to maximize water harvesting under Flexible Lot Development. 9. Per Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.D, provide page/detail reference to civil drawings/details that show bike racks, walkways, and screening/retaining walls on landscape plans. See civil drawing is not sufficient. 10. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 2-10-4.2.A.4., please be specific. 11. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf 12. Grading, hydrology, and landscape plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. UDC 7.6.6.C.2. The landscape and grading plans must match. 13. Retention/detention basins should be designed naturally and organically, whenever practicable. 14. Please add/call out soil moisture gauge/tensiometers and rain shut-off device on irrigation plans and details. UDC Tech Standards 4.01-2.A. 15. Show on-site location of temporary plant nursery holding area or indicate if they will be transplanted directly to final location. Administrative Manual 2-11.4.5. Please include method and schedule for plant irrigation in holding area. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/30/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | Email from: David.Stiffey@TucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Tue 11/30/2021 6:55 AM One Comment: On Sheet 7, amend note No. 4. -Near Side of the SVT to be 185 Ft. David Stiffey City of Tucson Transportation and Mobility |
| 12/08/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | Email from: TEP-DEVREV <TEPDEVREV@tep.com> To: CDRC Tue 12/7/2021 12:40 PM As identified on the Preliminary Drawing, easements for Tucson Electric Power Co. (TEP) facilities must be shown on the final plat and provided to TEP for review before submittal for approval. The customer is responsible for compliance with City Ordinances. Please note Jurisdictional permit for any work on public road right of way. Should you have any easement questions, don't hesitate to get in touch with tepdevrev@tep.com. Tucson Electric Power Co. Land Resources Department Attn: Diane, Renee |
| 12/08/2021 | ALEXANDRA HINES | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide - architectural variation plan and, - privacy mitigation plan. per UDC 8.7.3.M alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/08/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: C. McMillan Wed 12/8/2021 11:36 AM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0284 DESCRIPTION: Tentative Plat/FLD/Floodplain - Casas Del Cerrito, Lots 1 thru 49, and Common Areas "A" (open space, drainage), and "B" (open space). 3131 S PORTIA Ave. Fee Balance: CREDIT of -$2,662.87 - see image at end of this email (ignoring the blue highlight) SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW INCLUDE IN RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for your Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) |
| 12/08/2021 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Reqs Change | If rezoning is planned for direct ordinance (one Mayor & Council meeting instead of two), get development package to conditional-approval for the rezoning to be scheduled on Mayor & Council. alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov |