Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0279
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/01/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/09/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. The record number for this project is DP21-0279. Please add to all sheets. 2. Please provide two 3"x5" box for Pima County Addressing 3. Pleas add property line linetype to legend 4. In the location map please label the site as "this project", center the site within one square mile, and label major streets and water courses 5. Please revise parcel numbers to 107-14-307A, 107-14-307B, and 107-14-3060. Also include the parcel number to the east 107-14-3100 6. Please make sure all linework plots in grayscale, typical all sheets. Sheet 2 7. Please label existing fence and wall to be removed or retained 8. A separate right-of-way permit is required for work within public right-of-way. 9. Please label driveway curb return radii 10. Please show sewer pipe inverts with flow arrows and label private or public 11. Please show water service and connection 12. Please show dimension for south setback 13. Revise keynote 3 to reference correct detail, number 7 14. Please add proposed curb and keynote along parking adjacent to building 15. Please add ramp along path to the refuse area 16. Please identify all existing features as to be removed or to remain protect in place Sheet 3 17. Multiple spots of sidewalk are greater than max 2% cross slope. Please revise 18. Please add spot elevations on the sidewalks 19. It appears only a small portion of the site will drain through the corner inlets for the NW and NE basin curb cuts (84.00 and 82.70 callouts) based on the spot elevation provided. Please clarify how these will effectively drain the water from the site. 20. Provide existing spot elevations along east edge. Verify that new pavement/Top of Curb elevation do not block flow. Provide section to indicate existing grade to new pavement transition. 21. Please clarify whether spot grades are TC, gutter, or EP and add abbreviations to legend Drainage Statement Comments: Page 1/6 1. Where/how do Water Harvesting basins discharge when full? Will discharge overtop the sidewalk, be conveyed under sidewalk via scupper, or pond in the parking lot? Please provide additional explanation. Page 2 2. Per the recently adopted revision to the City of Tucson's Detention/Retention Manual Tech Standards Amendments (effective June 1, 2021) Section 1.2.2.c - Properties within the City of Tucson that are currently in undesignated basins, shall be treated as balanced basins. 3. Per PCRFCD's Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Section 1.2.2.a - New development located within a Balanced Basin must provide sufficient detention to reduce the post-developed 2-, 10- and 100-year peak discharge rates to the predeveloped rates. Proposed discharges are greater than existing discharges. Please review and revise as necessary. Page 6 4. Developed Conditions Map - Site Map indicates 100% P Soil. Please review and revise as necessary 5. Developed Conditions Map - Map does not indicate drainage patterns for developed conditions. Where do flows discharge from the site? Please review and revise as necessary Page 7/9 6. Hydrologic Data Sheets - Development Plan indicates Project site is 0.83 acres but Watershed Areas for "Existing site" are much higher (2.50 acres) which is also different than the Peak Discharges Table on Sheet 2 of 2 for the Developed Conditions Map. Please review and revise as necessary. Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/15/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Mariscos Chihuahua – 207 E Grant Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0279 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 15, 2021 DUE DATE: November 18, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 19, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0279, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.A – Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area of the location map. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Label the section corners on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Remove the lot coverage calculation as it is not applicable in the C-2 Zone, see UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE C-1, C-2, C-3, OCR-1, & OCR-2 ZONES. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – As this site is made up of two (2) parcels a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Assessor’s Office Combo Request form with your next submittal. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Provide the zoning for the parcels west of Estrella Ave. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The B Space width, C Space depth, E Curb length dimensions shown on Detail 2 sheet 4 are not correct. Review UDC Article 7.4.6.D.1, Figure 7.4.6-A & Table 7.4.6-1 and provide the correct dimensions. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – as wheel stop curbing is proposed for the southern row of angled parking provide a detail that shows the wheel stop and a dimension for the location. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The wheel stop curbing location dimension shown Details 2 & 3 sheet 4 is not correct, review UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3 and Figure 7.4.6-C and provide the correct dimension. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate on the detail or plan how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e are met for the short- & long-term bicycle parking. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter yard setbacks listed on sheet 1 are not correct. Per UDC Article 11.4.6 definition of Established Area Setback any site that borders on a street designated on the COT MS&R Map does not qualify for Established Area Setbacks. That said per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 & Table 6.4.5.C-1 the street perimeter yard setback for Grant Road is 21’ or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two, as measured from the back of curb, for Estrella Ave the street perimeter yard setback is 21’ or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two, as measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the proposed height of the proposed structure within the building footprint. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/16/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/16/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Mariscos Chihuahua ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0279 Address: 201 E Grand Rd Zoning: C-2 Existing Use: vacant land Proposed Use: Food service TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 15, 2021 DUE DATE: November 17, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and all landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 3. Please label the existing and future rights of way for Street, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 4. Resolve graphic conflicts so the plans are easily readable. The line weight of the property line is too thick; it blocks the landscape below. 5. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking rows does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40' of a tree is only one of the requirements. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.1.B.1, UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 and UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a. 6. Per Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.D, provide page/detail reference to civil drawings/details that show bike racks, walkways, and screening/retaining walls on landscape plans. See civil drawing is not sufficient. 7. A landscape cover sheet is not required, however construction details are. See Admin Manual 2-10-4.2.D Content Requirements. 8. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 2-10-4.2.A.4., please be specific. 9. Identify the point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow. 10. Identify curb inlets/ splash pads to landscape areas on all landscape plans. 11. Please add/call out soil moisture gauge/tensiometers and rain shut-off device on irrigation plans and details. UDC Tech Standards 4.01-2.A. 12. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/16/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/06/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Jeff Stanley Mon 12/6/2021 11:00 AM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0279 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading - Mariscos Chihuahua, new restaurant. 201 E GRANT RD Fee Balance: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW INCLUDE IN RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for your Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) |