Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0263
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/13/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/13/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | (See the following in the Documents section of PRO: "TEP FACILITY MAP", "TEP REDLINE REVIEW COMMENT LETTER", and "TEP REDLINE REVIEW COMMENTS") October 21, 2021 SUBJECT: Houghton Dermatology, DP21-0263 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the development plan submittedOctober 13th 2021. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. There is an existing underground primary line between transformer NWCB-2 and junction cabinet NWCB-1 at the North end of the development. This line should be protected in place. There is also underground primary cable between junction cabinet NWCB-1 and transforemr HTWC-20 that is not shown on the plans. Verify cable location and depict on plans. In order for TEP to approve the plan, our facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit a revised blueline to the City of Tucson for TEP’s review. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area Designer, Cruz Vega, at (520) 349-9850 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Conor Mahoney, Office Support Assistant Design/Build |
| 10/13/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 10/13/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 10/13/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 10/25/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Houghton Dermatology Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0263 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 25, 2021 DUE DATE: October 29, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is September 28, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0263, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 – General Note 3 needs to be revised to read “MEDICAL SERVICE OUTPATIENT” not Medical Office. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Remove General Notes 6 & 17 as this parcel is not abutting or adjacent to a right-of-way designated on the COT MS&R Map. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Provide a general note stating “ THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.6 AIRPORT ENVIRONS ZONE (AEZ).” 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Per PAD-36 Section 3.C Table C.1.0 provide a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation on the plan that meets the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.6. Also provide the running FAR within the required Zoning Documentation Table as the overall far needs to be tracked. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a PAAL width dimension from the landscape island shown directly north of the northwest corner of the building. Based on the PAAL width dimension provided just west of the island it appears that the width at this island is less than 24’. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a PAAL width dimension for the PAAL along the east side of the building. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – For both the short- & long- bicycle parking demonstrate on the plan/detail how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.d, .e are met. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – For the short-tern bicycle parking demonstrate on the plan/detail how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.f is met. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Under “DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PER HOUGHTON TOWN CENTER PAD-36” you list the “MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT = 60’ but per PAD-36 Section 3.C Table C.1.0, Maximum Building Height is 62’ feet from finished grade. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Demonstrate on the plan how the required sidewalk connect is provided to the adjacent buildings, see TSM Section 7-01.4.1.D. This connection shall meet all accessible requirements. 12. COMMENT: Per PAD-36 Section 3.C provide a Zoning Documentation Table that matches what is shown in the PAD and includes all items listed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 10/27/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/02/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | email from: Howard Dutt to: CDRC Tue 11/2/2021 10:30 AM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 631-2030 |
| 11/03/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Houghton Dermatology ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0263 Address: 10042 E Old Vail Rd. Zoning: PAD-36 Existing Use: vacant, graded land Proposed Use: Medical office TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 3, 2021 DUE DATE: October 29, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Resolve graphic conflicts so the plans are easily readable. The rock pattern on the southeast portion of the lot covers the proposed landscape. The utilities layer is getting in the way of the landscape/walkways/drives. 3. Per Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.D, provide page/detail reference to civil drawings/details that show bike racks, walkways, and screening/retaining walls on landscape plans. See civil drawing is not sufficient. 4. Solely using the 40' trunk to parking space requirement or placing trees only along the edge of a parking area does not meet the intent of the UDC. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.1.B.1, UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 and UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a. 5. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required UDC Technical Standards Manual - Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. 6. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf 7. Grading, hydrology, and landscape plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. UDC 7.7.6.C.2. The landscape and grading plans must match. 8. Identify the point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow. 9. Identify curb inlets to landscape areas. 10. Retention/detention basins should be designed naturally and organically, whenever practicable. 11. Modify details to show depressed landscape areas. 12. Please add/call out soil moisture gauge/tensiometers and rain shut-off device on irrigation plans and details. UDC 4.2.A. 13. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/08/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Plans do not show a new fire sprinkler line. Provide TFD with the type of construction so that we can verify fire flow requirements. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis 520-837-7033 Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/01/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | Email from: David.Stiffey@TucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Tue 11/30/2021 12:43 PM 1. Correct the "site address" to correspond with the project location. David Stiffey City of Tucson Transportation and Mobility |
| 12/01/2021 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Completed | |
| 12/29/2021 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. This parcel is not part of a recorded subdivision. Revise all documents to clarify the correct legal description. 2. As part of a larger common plan of development or sale, a SWPPP is required. Provide a complete SWPPP. 3. Show continuous accessible route to Old Vail Road. 4. Revise the water harvesting notes to indicate the water harvesting basins will be between 6 and 9 inches deep. 5. Clearly show how water harvesting is maximized. Show how all landscape areas will be provided with water harvesting. 6. The crosswalk to the dumpster area leads to a landscape area. Provide pedestrian use area at the west end of the crosswalk. 7. Provide details showing accessible route from handicap accessible parking spaces to the sidewalk. Loren Makus loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/31/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To; Richard Fri 12/31/2021 2:51 PM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0263 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading - Houghton Dermatology. New medical building. 10042 E OLD VAIL RD FEE BALANCE: $ 2,439.02 Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW category fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENT If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL and include: 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for your Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) |