Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP21-0259
Parcel: 141366860

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Permit Number - DP21-0259
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/04/2021 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
10/04/2021 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed
10/04/2021 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed
10/04/2021 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed
10/19/2021 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved Email from: Howard Dutt
To: CDRC
Tue 10/19/2021 11:08 AM

No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA
Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks and Recreation
(520) 631-2030
10/21/2021 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: La Estancia Parcels 6-8
Development Package (1st Review)
DP21-0259

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 21, 2021

DUE DATE: October 26, 2021

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is September 23, 2022.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0259, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Provide documentation that the requirements of PAD-7 Section IV,B have been met.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – All existing easements shown to be abandoned by separate instrument will need to be abandoned prior to approval of this DP.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov.

To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
10/25/2021 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Approved (This TAA APPROVAL LETTER can be viewed in the Documents section of PRO.)

October 21, 2021
RE: DP21-0259 / Tentative Plat - La Estancia, Parcels 6 thru 8. Parcel 6: Lots 1 thru 107, and
Common Areas "A6" thru "E-6". Parcel 7: Lots 1 thru 107, and Common Areas "A7" thru "D7".
Parcel 8: Lots 1 thru 85, and Common Areas "A8" thru "b8", 1st Submittal, Received October 4,
2021

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP21-0259 / Tentative Plat - La Estancia, Parcels 6 thru 8. Parcel 6: Lots 1 thru 107, and Common Areas "A6" thru "E-6". Parcel 7: Lots 1 thru 107, and Common Areas "A7" thru "D7". Parcel 8: Lots 1 thru 85, and Common Areas "A8" thru
"b8"; 1st Submittal, a development package application for a tentative plat for a 54.365 acre site
located southeast of the intersection of East Camino Boleadoras and South Wilmot Road.
The property is zoned Planned Area Development 7 (PAD-7), with the proposed project containing a
single family use residential development.
This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public
disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace.

The Tucson Airport Authority approves the 1st submittal of this project and has no additional comments to provide.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811.

Respectfully,
Scott Robidoux, C.M., Manager of Planning
10/26/2021 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the site drawing to indicate for which lots backwater valves will be required because the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is less than 12" below the proposed first floor elevations. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Revise the site plan to show the locations of manholes 611 and 805.
3. Provide the FFE for lot 23 of parcel 7.
10/27/2021 SBEASLE1 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change (The ATTACHED PDF mentioned below can be viewed in "Documents" section of PRO: "Pima Co Addressing review comments, first submittal")

Email from: <Addressing@pima.gov>
To: CDRC
Tue 10/26/2021 11:45 AM

La Estancia, 1st Submittal: DP21-0259 is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.
The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Robin Freiman, Addressing Official

Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
10/28/2021 SBLOOD1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change Development Package Comments:
Sheet 1
1. Please provide a 3"x5" blank space at the bottom right of all sheets for approval stamps.
2. Please include "PUBLIC STREETS" in main title on the title sheet. Please provide number of lots in title.
3. Please circle final lot numbers in key map and on plan sheets per the symbol identified in the legend.
4. Please match sewer and water line types throughout plan set, as identified on the legend.
5. Please add north arrow to location map.
6. Please show electrical pedestals and transformers on plan sheets, as identified within the legend.
7. Please add water AV's and BO's to legend. Check that all symbols in plan set are shown on legend.
8. Please identify all streets as public/private, including existing streets (on key map and all plan sheets)
9. Please identify the parcel number of all adjacent developments.
10. Please provide COT field book number and page for basis of elevation.
11. Please identify the roadways that are screened back in the key map and in plan view that run within the subdivision. The line type makes them look to be existing, but google earth shows no existing roads.
12. Please label common areas and types on title sheet and within all plan sheets.
13. R/W line type is not distinguishable from the PL. Please revise per the legend (typ on all plan sheets)
14. Please provide vertical datum
15. The 100-yr flood limit line type in the legend doesn't match that in the plan sheets. Please revise.
16. Are the "100-year inundation limits" and the "high water line" the same? They have the same line type in the legend. Please clarify and revise as needed. Or delete HIGH Water Line - not typically used in City of Tucson
17. Please show all trails on key map.
18. Please provide a 3"x5" blank space at the bottom right of cover sheet for use by Pima County addressing

Sheet 2
19. Please add appropriate "trail note" per AM2-06.4.7.F

Sheet 3
20. Please adjust all text height to be 0.9375" minimum within "building setback" detail and throughout plans.
21. Indicate private/public on "neighborhood residential road" detail.
22. Discrepancy in PUE width between "building setbacks" detail and "neighborhood residential road" detail. Please correct.

Sheet 4
23. Please add Lot 107 to the Parcel 7 "lot tables"

Sheet 6
24. Please provide scale and north arrow.

Sheet 7
25. Please add elevation label style to the legend on title sheet.
26. It is unclear what the subdivision boundary is on the east side. There appears to be two thick black lines. Please label all line work and provide bearing and distances for all boundary lines. (typ all sheets)
27. Please label the PUE on the plan sheets. (typ)
28. Please identify the gray hatched circle symbol along the water lines within the legend. (near intersection of Camino Boleadoras and S. Paseo Monte Verde
29. Please identify all proposed and existing streets as public/private.
30. Please add slopes of existing roadways. (typ)
31. Please add spot elevations at existing join conditions.
32. Please label 100-yr flood limit and match line type identified in legend. (typ)
33. Survey monuments must be noted to be offset from manholes. (typ)
34. Please provide locations of signs (stop signs / street signs) (typ.)
35. Please provide slope labels on all distinct slopes. 2:1 max recommended by the technical standards manual. (typ)
36. Please provide contour labels and slopes on all proposed grading. (typical, but comment made regarding dog park)
37. This line behind the single-family lots 47-53 looks to be the right-of-way line type. Please clarify/adjust as needed. (typ)
38. Indicate new pavement limits at entrance
39. Call out ramps and detail number
40. Please add flow lines to legend and add street slopes to flow arrows (typ all sheets)
41. Please use MH symbol shown on Legend for all MH's (typical all sheets)
42. Provide profiles for all storm drains and culverts; reference callouts to details; provide elevations of all water/sewer crossings. (typical all sheets)
43. Please provide basin ID and information (typ all basins)
44. Provide Top of Curb (TC)at intersections returns, PC &PT. Provide TC or spot grades at scuppers/inlets. (typical all sheets)

Sheet 8
45. Please label existing contours (typ)
46. Please fix any text overlaps (typ, but comment made regarding "matchline see sheet. 09" and "S. Avenida Solera (Public)")
47. Please show edge grading conditions to match existing swale along the west edge of the subdivision. (typ)
48. Please show transition from existing to proposed sidewalk at the intersection of Camino Boleadoras and Avenida Solera
49. Please clarify the drainage structure type for storm drain note 10.
50. Please identify diamond shape symbols as they are not typical for plans. (typ all sheets & intersections)

Sheet 9
51. Label and dimension all trails. The trails to the southeast of lot 24 seem to conflict with grading. Please revise.
52. Label what looks to be mow curbs located around the trails adjacent to the excluded well site. How do these work with the grading?
53. Check that all slope arrows are pointing in the correct direction. (typ, but comment made regarding 4:1 slope on lot 24)
54. Please provide the slope of the channel between lots 34-42 and lots 24-30 (typ)

Sheet 10
55. What is the thick dashed line to the west of lots 90 and 91. Please label all lines.
56. Please identify if drainage basins are considered common areas. Label all common areas and lots.
57. What is the thick dashed line running through lot 56? Please label all lines.
58. What is the thick solid line crossing E. Los Cristales between lots 10 and 11? Please label all lines.
59. What is the thick solid line in front of lot 98? Please label all lines.
60. Is there common space to the west of lots 48-55. Please label all common spaces. (typ)
61. Some property lines on the west side have the line type matching the right of way. Please clarify/adjust as needed.
62. Please provide slope labels along trails and identify material. (typ)

Sheet 11
63. Please clean up text for legibility (typ)
64. Please add contour and slope labels (typ, but comment made regarding channel at CP18 outlet)
65. The property line along the west edge of lots 39-47 looks like the right-of-way line type. Please clarify/adjust as needed.
66. Please identify jagged lines behind lots 44-47

Sheet 12
67. Please add bearing and distance to eastern boundary limit. (typ of all boundary lines)
68. Please provide easement widths (typ)
69. Please move bearing / distance text away from sewer connection (MH#801) for clarity.
70. Please overlapping text (typ)
71. Please dimension sewer easement south of the cul-de-sac, 20' min.
72. Please show edge grading conditions to match existing swale along east edge of sub-division. (typ)
73. Please clarify if easements are existing or proposed. (typ)
74. Call out water line at connection point to the east of lot 15. Size, material, existing or future.


SWPPP Comments:
1. An approved SWPPP will be required prior to construction.

Drainage Comments:
1. Section 1.2 - Text describes Phase II West Parcels 9 - 9 instead of 6 - 9. Please update as necessary.
2. Section 3.3 - Text refers to Appendix B for analysis of pre- and post-developed conditions. Additional description within text and/or summary tables needed to clarify results of analysis. Please review and revise as necessary.
3. Section 4.4 - Report indicates Appendix D "has been organized to describe each drainage basin's characteristics" however Appendix D was not included. Please review and revise as necessary.
4. Section 4.5 - Text indicates Hydraulic Toolbox reports are provided in Appendix D, but only summary table was found in App C. Please review and revise as necessary.
5. Section 4.6 - Text indicates a summary table is located in Appendix D, but Appendix D was not included. Please review and revise as necessary.
6. Section 4.7 - Additional discussion and/or summary table is needed to clarify which CPs contribute flow to each catchbasin.
7. Section 4.8 - Drainage swales are discussed but no calculations were found. Do these swales have capacity? What are the depths and velocities within these swales? Please review and revise as necessary.
8. Section 4.9 - Erosion control and stabilization is mentioned however calculations were not provided. Please include sizing for outlet protection shown.
9. Exhibit 4 - Stormdrain pipe, manholes, culverts and catchbasins aren't labeled on Exhibit 4. Please review and add necessary callouts for clarity.
10. Appendix C Stormdrain Analysis - Catchbasin table shows each trench drains fully capture 10-yr flows; however, both trench drains are at-grade and not in sag. Additional explanation is required to understand how all the 10-yr flow is captured at each catchbasin if not in sag. Please review and revise as necessary.
11. Appendix C Stormdrain Analysis - Catchbasin table shows numerous ponding Depths (gutter) over 6", which overtops curb and does not satisfy 10-yr flow street capacity previously mentioned in report. Please review and revise as necessary.


Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact:
Stephen Blood
(520) 837-4958
Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov
11/03/2021 JPEELDA1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Cl-De-Sac shall be 96' diameter Appendix D, 2018 IFC
11/17/2021 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Reqs Change Email from: David.Stiffey@TucsonAz.gov
To: CDRC
Wed 11/17/2021 1:05 PM

Please add the following:

Sheets 7 & 8, add Sight Visibility Triangles where entrances to the project intersect with Camino Boleadoras


David Stiffey
City of Tucson
11/23/2021 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Passed
11/24/2021 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved Email from: TEP-DEVREV <TEPDEVREV@tep.com>
To: CDRC
Wed 11/24/2021 11:31 AM

Tucson Electric Power Co. (TEP) has reviewed the plans submitted on October 4th , 2021, and has no objections at this time.

The customer is responsible for compliance with City Ordinances. Please note jurisdictional permit for any work on a public road right of way is required. Easements are required for TEP facilities if not appropriately recorded on the final subdivision plat. They will need to be obtained by separate instrument.

Please contact tepdevrev@tep.com for any easement questions.

Tucson Electric Power Co.
Land Resources Department
Attn: Courtney Tejeda
11/26/2021 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved Email from: Douglas Moseke <dmoseke@azdot.gov>
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2021 9:33 AM
To: CDRC <CDRC@tucsonaz.gov>
Subject: La Estancia, 1st Submittal: DP21-0259

Approved.
Reminder for future reference: A Design Concept Report will be required for the widening of Interstate 10 in this area.

Regards,
Doug Moseke, PE, Assistant District Engineer

Arizona Dept. of Transportation
1221 S. 2nd Avenue
Tucson, Arizona 85713
O: 520.388.4219, C: 520.354.0786
azdot.gov
11/26/2021 AWARNER1 LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL
TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination
FROM: Anne Warner, RLA
PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section

PROJECT: Tentative plat for La Estancia, Parcels 6-8
ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0259
Address: 6670 E Camino Boleadoras
Zoning: PAD-7
Existing Use: Disturbed, vacant land
Proposed Use: single-family residential

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 26, 2021
DUE DATE: October 26, 2021
COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed.
This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting.
1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval.

2. Please add all previous activity numbers on the cover page under Drawings References

3. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a.

4. Provide approved NPPO plans for the entirety of La Estancia PAD with next submittal.

5. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 2-10-4.2.A.4., please be specific.

6. It is difficult to distinguish between the two sizes of Leslie Roy Mesquite on the planting plans, please make them easily distinguishable.

7. The PAD calls for trees to be no more than 25’ on-center along primary streetscapes (Camino Boleadoras).

8. Add a note regarding the species and size of tree to be planted in each front yard lot.

9. Identify the specific cultivar for Leucophyllum and the species of Eremophilla on the plant legend.

10. According to the PAD “4.2 - Water Harvesting will be incorporated in park and open spaces areas.” Please label, note or otherwise show on the plans that this is being accomplished in these areas.

11. Please add/call out soil moisture gauge/tensiometers and rain shut-off device on irrigation plans and details. UDC 4.2.A.



RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package

YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
Select "Existing Application"
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to
the reviewer's Requires changes comments)
2) Plan Set (or individual sheets)
3) Any other items requested by review staff

If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov
11/26/2021 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Email from: COTDSDPermits
To: Andie Hemmah
Fri 11/26/2021 5:02 PM

Returned for Corrections: DP21-0259
DESCRIPTION:
Tentative Plat - La Estancia, Parcels 6 thru 8. Parcel 6: Lots 1 thru 107, and Common Areas "A6" thru "E-6". Parcel 7: Lots 1 thru 107, and Common Areas "A7" thru "D7". Parcel 8: Lots 1 thru 85, and Common Areas "A8" thru "b8".
6670 E CAMINO BOLEADORAS

FEE BALANCE: $ 9,260.35 (an image is at end of this email)
A payment is required before your next submittal.
ONLINE PAYMENT
If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees
1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees
2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000
(not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed)
3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank
4- "Continue"
5- In the Pay column - check the boxes
6- "Continue"

SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.)
- Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections
- Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS
- Documents section - click on VIEW

INCLUDE IN RESUBMITTAL
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments)
2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made)
3) Any other documents requested by review staff

Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter
FILEDROP for your Resubmittal
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
- Select "Existing Application"
- In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff

Thank you.
Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist

City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services
Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov
(disregard the email response that will be sent automatically)