Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP21-0249
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/27/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/27/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 09/27/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 09/27/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 10/12/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Val-Val, Lots 1-11 Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0249 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 12, 2021 DUE DATE: October 19, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is September 14, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the phone number and email address for the “OWNER/DEVELOPER” listed on the cover sheet. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.C – Based on General Note 6 the proposed street will be private and therefore should be a common area, list it as such in the title block. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0249, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Revise General Note 4 to read “PROPOSED USE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED SUBJECT TO USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS 4.9.7.B.5 – 9”. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As Mission Rd is designated on the COT MS&R map as an Arterial Scenic provide a general note stating ““THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.3 SCENIC CORRIDOR ZONE (SCZ) & UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)”. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – All easements shown on the plan to be abandoned shall be abandoned prior to approval of this DP. Provide the recordation information for the abandonment on the plan. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information for Mission Rd, right-of-way width, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.C – Label the common area on the plan. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 – As the existing curb is not a future location show future and existing sight visibility triangles along Mission Rd. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking spaces calculation is not correct. Per UDC TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Single-Family and Mobile Home Dwellings, based on street section 5 sheet 5 you are providing parking on both sides of the proposed street therefore the visitor parking requirement is 0.25 space per unit. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – Zoning acknowledges that Mission Rd right-of-way is at full width but existing curb and sidewalk are not at full width. Show the future curb & sidewalk on the plan. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter yard setbacks listed are not correct. Review UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 & Table 6.4.5.C-1 ADT of 140 or less and revise the street perimeter yard setbacks. This applies to the main dwelling only not the garage. Review UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.b for garage/carport street setbacks. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Detail 4 sheet 5 the front yard setback show is not correct, see comment above. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Lot one street setback to Mission Rd is based on UDC Article 5.3.5.A. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Per UDC Article 5.3.5.A.3 Residential structures shall not exceed 24 feet in height within the 400 scenic corridor. As the corridor was not shown on the plan the lots effected by this requirement were not verified but it appears that the majority of lots in this subdivision are affected. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly show the required sidewalk to the sidewalk in the Mission Rd. right-of-way. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – Clarify is gang mail boxes are proposed and if so show them on the plan. Scenic Corridor Comments: 18. COMMENT: Show the 400’ Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) on the plan, UDC Article 5.3.3.A. 19. COMMENT: Show the 30’ buffer area on the plan, UDC Article 5.3.4.A.1. 20. COMMENT: Provide the following general notes on the plan: 1) Building or structure surfaces, that are visible from the Scenic Route , shall have colors that are predominant within the surrounding landscape, such as desert and earth tones. Single-family dwellings, except in subdivisions recorded after May 28, 1985, are exempt from this standard. 2) Fencing and freestanding walls facing the Scenic Route shall meet the material restrictions in Section 7.6.5, Screening Standards. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 10/15/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Needs Review | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, LA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Val-Val ACTIVITY NO: Dp21-0249 Address: 3002 S Mission Rd Zoning: Existing Use: Undisturbed Sonoran Desert Proposed Use: Single-family residential TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 15, 2021 DUE DATE: October 19, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. A Commercial Water Harvesting Plan is required, Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. 2. An Environmental Resource Report is required prior to further review of this submittal. UDC Tech Manual 4-02.2.2.C. and .2.3. |
| 10/18/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC Mon 10/18/2021 10:11 AM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 631-2030 |
| 10/19/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the location of the HCS for each lot. Determine the need for backwater valves per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 10/20/2021 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | (The ATTACHED PDF mentioned below can be viewed in "Documents" in PRO: "Pima Co Addressing review comments, first submittal") Email from: <Addressing@pima.gov> To: CDRC Tue 10/19/2021 11:53 AM VAL-VAL, 1st Submittal: DP21-0249 is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 10/28/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. Please provide two 3"x5" boxes, for approval stamp and for Pima County Addressing 2. Please provide owner telephone and email 3. The record number for this project is DP21-0249. Please add to all sheets. 4. Please show watercourses within one square mile on the location map 5. Sheet 4 shows the proposed sewer is public but note 10 states it is private. Please revise. 6. Parking calculation 11x1=1 is incorrect. Please revise. 7. Please indicate mailbox location on plans. 8. Please specify access road as private or public, or correct the designation of common area A in the title block if applicable. Sheet 2 9. Please show ROW information and dimensions. 10. Plan shows lots 5 & 8 use easements for access, please provide documentation that the easement holder will allow the access. 11. Please identify drainage (channel and CMP) as public or private and show easement lines 12. Please provide street cross sections 13. Please add flood line, erosion setback, and overhead line types on legend on sheet 1 14. Please provide road information public or private and with ROW info and dimensions 15. Please show AC pavement and concrete sidewalk hatches per legend on sheet 1, all sheets 16. Please label existing wall, fence, barrier to remain or to remove etc. 17. New public sewer line, please show direction of flow per legend on sheet 1 18. Prior to plan approval, please provide documentation that easements stated to be abandoned have been abandoned 19. Please provide a 3"x5" box, for approval stamp typical all sheets 20. Please identify the parcel ID and use of adjacent lots Sheet 3 21. Please provide channel cross section and culvert profile 22. Please provide bank protection along vehicle access routes. 23. Please provide more KN 1 & 2 labels in plan 24. KN20, please provide detail or standard 25. KN 14 retaining wall, please provide details. 26. A separate right-of-way permit is required for work within public right-of-way. 27. Please show and label future SVTs 28. Please add contour on legend 29. Please label curb type 30. KN 15, 1:1 slope needs geotech recommendation 31. Provide SD Manhole at culvert deflection point to provide maintenance access. 32. Provide slope and length to downstream MH and downstream MH # and invert Sheet 4 33. New public sewer line, please show direction of flow per legend and point of connection on sheet 1 34. Please show pipe inverts and channel grades 35. Please provide a grading detail with spot elevations for existing sewer manhole #7183-64 with proposed surrounding area since it is in the proposed drainage path. 36. Please add description ex. 17.85 FS (FS, TC, INV etc.) typical on all elevation labels. Add abbreviations used to legend 37. Label existing contours 38. Refine grading plan for channel and detention basin and to clearly show how proposed and existing channel grading will integrate and consider appropriate bank protection to ensure channel does not erode into the basin. Basin and outlet should not be within erosion hazard setback 39. Clarify how flows from Lots 10 & 11 enter the detention basin 40. Show limits(hatch) for grouted riprap in Note #15 41. Need to provide flap gate on basin low flow to prevent backwater from main channel 42. 42" culvert likely in conflict with existing MH 43. Consider placement of riprap adjacent to scupper down channel as erosion is likely to occur along edge 44. Refine grading on south side of grouted riprap channel upstream of hammerhead 45. Provide bank protection where needed to reduce EHS from encroaching on roadway and sidewalk Sheet 5 46. Detail 2 does not match information on sheet 4. Existing topo is 2413.00. WSEL is 2414.25 Please revise and add spot grades to channel 47. Provide minimum slope labels on lot layout detail 48. Clarify limits of shotcrete for drop structure on Detail 7 49. Provide culvert inlet/outlet end treatments 50. Provide section details through channel and channel/basin upstream and downstream of new 42" culvert 51. Describe how culverts will be deflected SWPPP Comments: 1. Please show the nearest receiving waters, including washes within square mile on the location map 2. Please show existing contours. 3. Please show proposed/existing drainage with flow arrows 4. Please show location of where sediment soil will be stockpiled and perimeter info of the property with bearings and distances 5. Please show locations of on-site material, waste, and equipment storage areas 6. PUE shows as red orange. Please change to black 7. Please show perimeter info of the property with bearings and distances Drainage Comments: Page 1 1. Use HEC-RAS or other appropriate analysis for channel hydraulics and floodplain. Normal depth is not appropriate for variable channel geometry Page 8 2. Show project footprint on FEMA map Page 13 3. Show project footprint on watershed map Page 14 4. Show project footprint on soils map Page 17 5. Verify Cw for Subarea #2 with 90% imperviousness Page 38 6. Verify "C" value for scupper calculation Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/02/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | Email from: David.Stiffey@tucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Tue 11/2/2021 8:52 AM 1. Please provide Sight Visibility Triangles, both current and future. 2. Please note sidewalk width on plans- 6 Ft. wide sidewalk is required. 3. Please show the buffer zone between sidewalk and back of curb- 2 Ft. minimum. 4. Please show the Right of Way- both existing and future. 5. Please have the curb access ramps drawn on the plans where they will be/ with spot grades. 6. Please indicate how this entrance will be tied into Valencia Rd. 7. Note: A floodplain use permit will be required for work at this location, please contact Elizabeth Leibold- Elizabeth.leibold@tucsonaz.gov David Stiffey City of Tucson |
| 11/03/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | DP shall show the fire hydrants existing and new meeting the requirements of IFC 2018, 507.5.1. Design criteria shall be 1,000 gpm for 2 hours if a neighborhood. All parts of all parcels shall be within 600' of a hydrant. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis 520-837-7033 Jennifer.Peel-Davis@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/05/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Jeffrey Stanley Fri 11/5/2021 8:21 AM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0249 DESCRIPTION: Tentative Plat/Floodplain - Val-Val. Lots 1 thru 11, and Common Area "A" (drainage). 3002 S MISSION RD Fee Balance: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab and you will see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW INCLUDE IN RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) |
| 11/05/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REVIEW | Approved | Email from: Eric Latto To: CDRC Thu 11/4/2021 4:58 PM Approved. These lots are between bus stops along Mission. I don’t see any impact to operations other than possible trackout during contruction. Eric Latto City of Tucson Transit / Sun Tran |
| 11/08/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Email from: TEP-DEVREV <TEPDEVREV@tep.com> To: CDRC Fri 11/5/2021 9:38 AM Tucson Electric Power Co. (TEP) has reviewed the plans submitted on September 27th, 2021, and has no objections at this time. The customer is responsible for compliance with City Ordinances. Please note jurisdictional permit for any work on a public road right of way is required. Easements are required for TEP facilities if not appropriately recorded on the final subdivision plat. They will need to be obtained by separate instrument. Tucson Electric Power Co. Land Resources Department attn: Courtney Tejeda |