Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP21-0248
Parcel: 111031770

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP21-0248
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/21/2022 SBLOOD1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. See previous comment 2 - Show the dimensions between the new gas canopy and parking spots 7,8, and 9 to ensure the required 24' PAAL width is maintained. These parking spots were moved but still not dimensioned to show that the required 24' PAAL width is maintained.
2. The trash enclosure can not be stored in the public right-of-way of E Keindale Rd Per Technical Standards Manual section 8-01.5.4.

Stephen Blood
(520) 837-4958
Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov
01/21/2022 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Speedy Mart Gas Station – 3370 N Country Club Rd – C-1
Development Package (2nd Review)
DP21-0248

TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 21, 2022

DUE DATE: January 25, 2022

This comment was not addressed correctly. Provide a detailed response to all comments below. - COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is September 13, 2021.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

1. Previous comment 1 - This comment was not addressed. “3/32”=1’-0” is an architectural scale, engineer scale would be 1”=10’ or 1”= 20’. COMMENT: 2-06.3.2 – All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2. Previous comment 8 - This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the section corners on the location map. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

3. Previous comment 11 - This comment was not addressed. The proposed use should be listed as “General Merchandise Sales: Excluding Large Retail Establishments, subject to Use Specific Standard 4.9.13.Q.”. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

4. Previous comment 14 - This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the required bearings on the plan. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot.

5. Previous comment 16 - This comment was not fully addressed. Provide dimensions for the width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks for both Country Club & Kleindale. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the right-of-way width, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

6. Previous comment 18 – This comment was not addressed. - COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly demonstrate that there is a 24’ PAAL provided between parking spaces 7, 8 & 9 and the gas pump vehicle spaces under the new canopy.

7. Previous comment 20 – This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a typical parking space detail for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. As wheel stops are propose this detail shall demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3 are met.

8. Previous comment 21 - This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide enough information on the plan/detail so that the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 section 502.5 can be verified for the proposed accessible space.

9. Previous comment 22 - This comment was not fully addressed. Provide a mounting height for the accessible sign. This height should be 84’ if within a pedestrian way or 60” if wall mounted. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a detail for the required accessible signage.

10. Previous comment 23 - This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – As County Club Rd is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R map and right-of-way dedication is not proposed show the future right-of-way line along with future curb and sidewalk for Country Club Rd.

11. Previous comment 24 - This comment was not fully addressed. Until future curb for Grant Rd is shown the correct perimeter yard setbacks cannot be shown. It appears that the proposed canopy will not meet the required 21’ to the back of future curb. A Board of Adjustment for Variance may be required. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide street perimeter yard setback dimensions from the proposed gas canopy to both Country Club & Kleindale. The setback along County Club Rd is 21’ or the height of the canopy measured from the back of future curb. For Kleindale the setback is 21’ or the height of the canopy measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane, see UDC Articles 6.4.5.C.2, & Table 6.4.5.C-1. Review UDC Article 6.4.5.D.2 for clarification on where on the canopy the setback is measured from. Per UDC Article 6.4.5.B.2 A vertical structural member(s) (i.e., post, column, dormer wall) supporting a roof extension from the principal structure is considered a wall for applying perimeter yard requirements, but in this case the overhang exceeds the allowable 2’-0 overhang allowed for an encroachment into the perimeter yard setback, see UDC Article 6.4.5.D.2.a.(2). That said the street perimeter shall be measured from 2’-0” back from the edge of the canopy roof.

12. Previous comment 25 - This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height within the footprint for both structures shown on the plan.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.T – The proposed trash enclosure is partially location within the right-of-way along Kleindale Rd., provide written approval from COT Department of Transportation & Mobility for this structure to be built within the right-of-way.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov.

To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
01/24/2022 AWARNER1 LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
01/25/2022 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Email from: COTDSDPermits
To: Christian Messner
Tue 1/25/2022 1:26 PM

REVIEW NOTICE
Returned for Corrections: DP21-0248

DESCRIPTION: Site - Speedy Mart Gas Station. Add canopy. 3370 N COUNTRY CLUB RD

Fee Balance: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment.

YOUR NEXT STEPS
1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.)
- Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections
- Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS
- Documents section - click on VIEW

2. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL and include:
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments)
2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made)
3) Any other documents requested by review staff

Please title your THIRD submittal documents according to this example: 3_Comment Response Letter

FILEDROP for your Resubmittal
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
- Select "Existing Application"
- In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff
- Select for documents "PLANS" for quicker downloading of your documents on our end

Thank you.
Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist

City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services
Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov
12/24/2021 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed