Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0247
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/27/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/11/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Tucson Gas Station – 1306 W Grant Rd – I-1 Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0247 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 11, 2021 DUE DATE: October 18, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is September 13, 2021. 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.2.2 – Review AM Section 2-06.0 and submit a development package (DP) the provides all required information per this standard. Once a DP meeting these standards is provided additional comments maybe forth coming. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.2.4 – Remove all building code references, information and plan sheets form the DP as a separate submittal is required for building code review. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 3. COMMENT: 2-06.3.2 – All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.3.7 - A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. See requirements below. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on all sheets. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0247, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three-inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.A – The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three-inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is I-1." 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List as a general note: the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R).” 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Remove all references to Lot Coverage as it is not applicable to a site zoned I-1, see UDC TABLE 6.3-5.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE P-I, I-2, & I-2 ZONES. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – As you are expanding the building area provide a building expansion calculation on the plan. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – If applicable show all easements of record on the plan along with the recordation information. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the right-of-way width, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – As parking is being reconfigured clearly show the required PAAL’s that will provide access to the vehicle parking spaces. Review UDC Article 7.4.6.D, Figure 7.4.6-A and Table 7.4.6-1 and provide all applicable dimensions. The PAAL’s shall not encroach into the gas pump area. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The use listed under the “PARKING REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY” is not correct and should be “GENERAL MERCHANDISE SALES”. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Under the “PARKING REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY”, “REQUIRED” you list the square footage as “1,657” but on sheet “NSP” within the foot print of the building you list the square footage as “1,641”, clarify which is correct. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Under the “PARKING REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY”, “REQUIRED” you list the required parking ratio as “200” and it should be 300 which calculate out to be five (5) required vehicle parking spaces, revise the calculation. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a typical parking space detail for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. As wheel stops are propose this detail shall demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3 are met. 26. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide enough information on the plan/detail so that the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 section 502.5 can be verified. 27. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a detail for the required accessible signage. 28. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – As building expansion is proposed provide a short-term bicycle parking space calculation of the plan. The calculation shall include the ratio used and the number required & provided, see UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces. 29. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short-term bicycle parking detail that demonstrates that the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1, B.2 & .C are met. 30. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – As Grant Rd is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R and it does not appear that the curb location does not to match the 120’ street cross section in the MS&R plan, show the future curb & sidewalk location on the plan. 31. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide street perimeter yard setback dimensions from the proposed gas canopy to both Grant & Freeway. The setback for both is 21’ or the height of the canopy measured from the back of existing or future curb, greater of the two, see UDC Articles 6.4.5.C.2, & Table 6.4.5.C-1. Per UDC Article 6.4.5.B.2 A vertical structural member(s) (i.e., post, column, dormer wall) supporting a roof extension from the principal structure is considered a wall for applying perimeter yard requirements, but in this case the overhang exceeds the allowable 2’-0 overhang allowed for an encroachment into the perimeter yard setback, see UDC Article 6.4.5.D.2.a.(2). That said the street perimeter shall be measured from 2’-0” back from the edge of the canopy roof. 32. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height within the footprint for both structures shown on the plan. As an expansion and reconfiguration of vehicle parking is proposed the following comments apply for on-site pedestrian circulation: 33. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A provide a sidewalk from the proposed addition to the sidewalk within the right-of-way along Grant Rd. 34. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B provided a 4’ sidewalk along the west side of the building. 35. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.C provided a 4’ sidewalk along the south side of the building. 36. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per IBC 1104.1 demonstrate on the plan that there is an accessible route between all structures, to all accessible vehicle parking spaces, to at least one of the right-of-way’s, etc. that meets the requirements of 2018 IBC Chapter 11 and the ICC A117.1-2009. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 10/15/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/18/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for r modifying the building or as a separate permit. 2. Revise the site drawing to include the following existing utility information: a. The location of water lines, and fire hydrants. b. The location and size of sanitary sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. c. The point of connection to the existing public sewer. d. Any existing or proposed utility easements e. The first-floor elevation for the building Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. |
| 11/03/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/08/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Trash encloser is shown, please add trash enclosure details that comply with TSM section 8.01. Also include waste stream calculations along with the type and size of trash bins proposed. 2. Per TSM section 7-01.4.1 show a sidewalk out to connect with the sidewalk along W Grant Rd, a sidewalk along the west side of the building, and a sidewalk along the south side of the building. 3. Show the roof drainage discharge points to demonstrate that its not draining onto any sidewalks per TSM section 7.01.4.1.E. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/09/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: C. Messner Thu 12/9/2021 5:06 PM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0247 DESCRIPTION: SITE - Tucson Gas Station, Store Retrofit. 1306 W GRANT RD FEE BALANCE: $ 511.50 Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW category fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENT If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW INCLUDE IN RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for your Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) |