Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP21-0241
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/01/2022 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Reqs Change | In the right hand margin of sheets 3 through 7 revise the rezoning case number to read correctly as C9-07-10 rather than C9-01-10. In addition, place the DP case # (DP-21-0241) in the blank space just below the rezoning case number in the upper left hand corner of sheet 2 of 7. Peter McLaughlin PDSD Entitlements Section |
| 07/14/2022 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Approved. View in the DOCUMENTS section of PRO, titled, "TEP letter of approval, 07.13.22" and "TEP facilities map, 07.13.22" |
| 07/15/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Commercial Plaza – 1601 N Alvernon Way Development Package (2nd Review) DP21-0241 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 15, 2022 DUE DATE: July 22, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 06, 2022. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 1. This comment was not addressed. Per UDC TABLE 4.8-3: PERMITTED USES – OFFICE ZONES, O-2 Zone, Administrative and Professional Office use is subject to Use Specific Standard 4.9.13.J. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Once comment 11 is addressed identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, COMMERCIAL USE GROUP, Administrative and Professional Office, Short-term required is based on 1 space per 20,000 sq. ft. GFA. Minimum requirement is 2 spaces and long-term is based on 1 space per 6,000 sq. ft. GFA. Minimum requirement is 2 spaces. Provide a calculation the states the number required and provided for both the short- & long-term bicycle parking. 3. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide a detail for the proposed long-term bicycle parking. Also, Site Keynote8 references “SEE DETAIL 3 SHEET 1” but there is no detail 3 on sheet 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short- & long-term bicycle parking detail on the plan that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9 are met. 4. This comment was not addressed correctly. The street perimeter yard setback for Alvernon Way is 21’ or the (H) height of the building exterior wall, not 1 ½ the height. Also, the street perimeter yard setback for Lee is 21’ or the (H) height of the building exterior wall measured from outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane, not 10’-0”. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter yard setbacks shown under “SITE DATA: “ are not correct. Per UDC Article 11.4.6 definition of Established Area Setback when a property boarder on a street designated on the COT MS&R Map it does not qualify for Established Area Setbacks. That said per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1 the required street perimeter yard setback is 21’ or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two. For Alvernon Way this setback is measured form the back of future curb and for Lee it measured from outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. 5. Zoning acknowledges your response to this comment but was unable to find the 14’- 6” height shown anywhere on the plan. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Per UDC Table 6.3-3.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE O-1, O-2, & O-3 ZONES, O-2 Zone, Nonresidential Use to a Residential Zone the required perimeter yard setback is 10’-0” or ¾ the height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two. Based on a 16’-0” high building the required perimeter yard setback to the west property line is 12’-0”, proposed setback is 11’-0”. To reduce this setback a Design Development Option is required to be submitted and approved. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan and shall be submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. 6. This comment was not addressed. Under “SITE DATE” you still list a development designator, and FAR. COMMENT: As the Land Use Code is no longer applicable remove all references to development designators, perimeter yard designators and floor area ratios from the plan as they are no longer applicable in the O-2 zone, see UDC Table 6.3-3.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE O-1, O-2, & O-3 ZONES, O-2 Zone for applicable dimensional standards. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 07/29/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Alvernon/Lee Office Building ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0241 v2 Address: 1601 N Alvernon Way Zoning: O-2 Existing Use: vacant land Proposed Use: Office use TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 29, 2022 DUE DATE: July 21, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. Please label future rights of way for Alvernon Way, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 2. Remove right of notes unless planting in the right of way. 3. Change the common name of Live Oak to Desert Willow 4. Chaste tree is considered a small tree or large shrub, consider using a larger size or swapping with a larger canopy tree. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/23/2022 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Approved for Site DP only since only site review was requested. If grading is required (more than 50 cu yd of cut or fill) a separate grading DP is needed. Provide cut and fill quantities. |
| 08/25/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Benjamin Vogel cc: Peter Salonga 08/25/2022 REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP21-0241 Site - Commercial Plaza (related to expired D07-0050). 1601 N ALVERNON Way Fee Balance: amount is pending payment is not due at this time YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your THIRD submittal documents accordingly, example: 3_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD documents to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Any other documents requested by review staff FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) Sharon Beasley, Certified Permit Technician City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (for development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov (for building permits) |
| 08/25/2022 | DSTIFFE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | DP21-0241 2nd Review Comments: 1. Keynote No. 3- A P.A.G. standard 206 driveway apron cannot be built with curb returns. A width of 26 Ft is fine and you have on your plan 25' radius returns which is the requirement. Just delete the Keynote No. 3. 2. Keynote No. 20- New sidewalk on residential streets within the ROW are required to be 5 Ft. Correct Keynote number 20 to state that the new sidewalk will be 5 Ft wide. 3. Add a "Landing" to the back of the existing curb access ramp on the NW corner of Alvernon Way and Lee St. 4. At the point which the sidewalk from the onsite pedestrian circulation path ties into the existing sidewalk in the ROW, along Alvernon Way, this tie-in needs to be constructed as an ADA approved Landing. Landings are to be 60" X 60" and not to exceed 2% in any direction. 5. Keynote No. 2- These new curb access ramps are to have a minimum pedestrian travel width of 5 Ft. If the existing sidewalk that you'll be tying into is only 4' wide, then you will have to taper from 5' to 4'. Taper from 5' to 4' at a 3:1 ratio (Possibly two sidewalk panels.) David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |