Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0241
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/11/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/11/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | (This letter and the TEP FACILITY MAP mentioned below can be viewed in the Documents section of PRO) WR#T12548 October 29th 2021 SUBJECT: Alvernon Commercial Plaza DP21-0241 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the development plan submitted October 11th 2021. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. Existing TEP facilities including poles and overhead lines are not shown on the submitted plans. Please update the plans and re-submit for review. See attached facilities map.In order for TEP to approve the plan, our facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit a revised blueline to the City of Tucson for TEP’s review. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area Designer, Martin Rodriguez, at (520) 991-5495 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Conor Mahoney, Office Support Assistant Design/Build |
| 10/11/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 10/11/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 10/11/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 10/14/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REVIEW | Approved | Email from: Bea Paulus To: CDRC Mon 10/11/2021 2:48 PM This project is located at Alvernon/Lee NW. Sun Tran has no conflicts. The bus stops are at Pima SW and Fairmount SW. Thank you. Bea Paulus, Programs & Projects Manager Sun Tran 520-206-8826 bea.paulus@tucsonaz.gov (Transit) |
| 10/28/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: General A floodplain use permit will be required. Please start a new FUP at our permit application web page: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp. Instructions: 1. Is this for a new or existing activity application? - Please select New Application. 2. Submission Type - Select Floodplain Use Permit. 3. Project Name - Enter a name for your project. 4. Type of Permit - Select Commercial or Residential (Residential is for work on single family residences and duplexes.) 5. Select Street Name from the list. You can type the first two letters or number to get closer to your choice in the list. Then select the rest of the address in the boxes provided. 6. Description of Work - Enter in Floodplain Use Permit for…and then put a description of the work being done or reference the building permit number associated with this floodplain use permit. 7. Complete the Applicant Info. (Note APA# is for applicants with an advance payment account. Leave blank is you do not have an APA account. 8. Complete the Contractor, Owner and Architect/Engineer sections as applicable. 9. Supporting Documentation Upload - Provide a complete cost estimate for the project unless it is for a new build/separate structure. You may also provide additional documents you think will be helpful. 10. Sign the application and submit. Sheet 1 1. Please provide owner and architect emails 2. Please provide two 3"x5" boxes, for approval stamp and for Pima County Addressing 3. The record number for this project is DP21-0241. Please add to all sheets. 4. A separate right-of-way permit is required for work within public right-of-way. 5. Missing construction key notes for the curb, pavement section and wheel stop, gutter, sidewalk, wall with reference to standard details. Please revise 6. Accessible parking space and aisle max. grade is 2%, please show spot elevations and grades 7. Turnaround shape does not comply with the city requirement, please revise 8. The HC parking dimension shows 8'x18' but the label is 8'x20', Please clarify 9. Please provide spot elevations on the building line and sidewalk 10. The proposed building is in the 100-year floodplain limit. Please show proposed building comply with the floodplain regulations 11. It looks like the 10' setback is not properly dimensioned from the RW to the south building line, please clarify. 12. Please provide bar scale or graphic scale 13. There are missing linetypes. Please add legend linetype for PL or RW, watermain, contour and center line. 14. Please provide RW information and dimensions. Label RW 15. The existing RW location does not match the parcel 122-018-025A limits. Future RW? Please clarify. 16. Please show buffer dimensions in the plan 17. Please add accessible parking space count 18. Bicycle required min. 2 spaces for commercial use, please revise 19. Location map comments does not meet COT standards. Please label the site as "this project", enter the site within one square mile, and label major streets and water courses 20. The trash enclosure should not be located within a floodplain. Please revise. 21. The 24' building setback is not listed in the site data, please revise. 22. 12.9%- excessive slope for dimension labeled 68.64AC near entrance. A nearby gutter grade has the same elevation. Please revise and/or check for typos. 23. Provide min & max cross slope to detail B. Plan indicates 12% (see Sheet 1 comment). 24. Show compliance with UDC article 7.6.6.C.2 and how this site plan is maximizing water harvesting by showing curb cuts and runoff directed to water harvesting basins and basins being depressed 6-9 inches. Sheet 2 24. 8.5' min width needed on the parkin details, please revise 25. Please reference COT std where appropriate (typ, i.e., ramp detail) Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/01/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Commercial Plaza – 1601 N Alvernon Way Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0241 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 1, 2021 DUE DATE: November 8, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 06, 2022. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – The sheet index shown on sheet C1 only listed two (2) sheets but there are 9 sheets in the drawing set. Either add all sheets to the drawing index or remove sheets that are not applicable. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide an email address for the Owner/Developer & the Architect listed on sheet C1. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B – Provide a brief legal description within the title block on all sheets. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on all sheets of the DP. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0241, and the rezoning case number, C9-07-10, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Remove all references to “D07-0050” from the plan as this DP has expired. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.A – The location map shall show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area; 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – On the location map label the section corners north of Grant Rd. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 - As rezoning C9-07-10 has been effectuated revise the reference to “EXISTING ZONING IS R-2” to read “EXISTING ZONING IS O-2” on sheet C2 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 – As rezoning C9-07-10 has been effectuated remove the reference to “PROPOSED ZONING IS O-2” from the “ZONING AND LAND USE NOTES;” shown on sheet C2. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Sheet C1 under “PROJECT DESCRIPTION” you list “RETAIL” as a possible use. Per UDC TABLE 4.8-3: PERMITTED USES – OFFICE ZONES, O-2 Zone, Retail Trade Land Use Group With Land Use Class/Type: the only retail use allowed in the O-2 zone is Farmers’ Market as an accessory use to any permitted principal use in every land use group. For any other Retail use a rezoning would be required to a minimum zone of C-1. Clarify what you proposed uses are. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Once comment 11 is addressed identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Sheet C1 under “SITE DATA:” provide the applicable UDC Article for the Major Streets & Route overlay. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A – It does not appear that the site boundary is shown correctly. Per right-of-way dedication recordation docket 13300 page 2232, the north property line should be 105.96’, south 81.02’, east 95.27’ with a 25’ spandrel. Show the correct parcel with correct dimensions. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Provide the following information regarding Alvernon Way and Lee St on the plan, right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until comment 11 is addressed vehicle parking space requirements cannot be verified. Review UDC TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED and provide the correct parking ratio for the proposed uses. The calculation shall include the ratio used, number of spaces required & provided along with the number of accessible spaces, Van and Standard, required and provided. The 1 space per 400 is not correct for any of the proposed uses listed on the plan. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c – Until comment 11 is addressed loading area requirements cannot be verified. Review UDC TABLE 7.5.5-A: REQUIRED LOADING AREAS as it does not appear that the loading zone calculation is correct. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Until comment 11 is addressed bicycle parking, short- & long-term requirements cannot be verified. Review UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces and provide a correct short- & long-term bicycle parking calculation on the plan. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short- & long-term bicycle parking detail on the plan that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9 are met. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter yard setbacks shown under “SITE DATA: “ are not correct. Per UDC Article 11.4.6 definition of Established Area Setback when a property boarder on a street designated on the COT MS&R Map it does not qualify for Established Area Setbacks. That said per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1 the required street perimeter yard setback is 21’ or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two. For Stone Avenue this setback is measured form the back of future curb and for Lee it measured from outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Per UDC Table 6.3-3.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE O-1, O-2, & O-3 ZONES, O-2 Zone, Nonresidential Use to a Residential Zone the required perimeter yard setback is 10’-0” or ¾ the height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two. Based on a 16’-0” high building the required perimeter yard setback to the west property line is 12’-0”, proposed setback is 11’-0”. To reduce this setback a Design Development Option is required to be submitted and approved. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan and shall be submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage. Clearly show that there is a 4’-0” wide sidewalk that runs from the sidewalk along both streets to the building entrance. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.U – Demonstrate on the plans that rezoning conditions 5 & 6 are met. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provide a general note stating “ALL SIGNS REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMITS”. 26. COMMENT: As the Land Use Code is no longer applicable remove all references to development designators, perimeter yard designators and floor area ratios from the plan as they are no longer applicable in the O-2 zone, see UDC Table 6.3-3.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE O-1, O-2, & O-3 ZONES, O-2 Zone for applicable dimensional standards. 27. As the prior approve development plan, D07-0050 has expired and the parcel lines shown on them do not match what is currently at the site remove all old DP sheets from the plan and provide new landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/01/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/02/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 11/02/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | email from: Howard Dutt to: CDRC Tue 11/2/2021 10:21 AM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 631-2030 |
| 11/08/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Alvernon/Lee Office Building ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0241 Address: 1601 N Alvernon Way Zoning: O-2 Existing Use: vacant land Proposed Use: Office use TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 8, 2021 DUE DATE: November 8, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. The approved plans require updating. There are duplicate landscape/irrigation plans. 2. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 3. Please provide all landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 4. The notes reference the LUC, which was replaced by the UDC and some requirements have changed since that adoption. Please update notes. 5. Please label the existing and future rights of way for Alvernon Way and Lee Street, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 6. Per Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.D, provide page/detail reference to civil drawings/details that show bike racks, walkways, and screening/retaining walls on landscape plans. See civil drawing is not sufficient. 7. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 2-10-4.2.A.4., please be specific. 8. An irrigation plan and specifications are required per UDC Administration Manual 2-10.4.2.C and Technical Standards Manual Section 4-01.4.2, Irrigation Standards. 9. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. 10. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf 11. Grading, hydrology, and landscape plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. UDC 7.7.6.C.2. The landscape and grading plans must match. 12. Identify the point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow. 13. Identify curb inlets to landscape areas. 14. Retention/detention basins should be designed naturally and organically, whenever practicable. 15. Modify details to show depressed landscape areas. 16. Identify water meter and POC on irrigation plan. 17. Solely using the 40’ trunk to parking space requirement or placing trees only along the edge of a parking area does not meet the intent of the UDC. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.1.B.1, UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 and UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a. 18. Please add/call out soil moisture gauge/tensiometers and rain shut-off device on irrigation plans and details. UDC 4.2.A. 19. Provide a detail to show tree planting with root barrier adjacent to walkways. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/17/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | Email from: David Stiffey To: CDRC Wed 11/17/2021 2:34 PM See comments below: 1. Only the dimensions of the "near side" SVT are noted, please note the dimensions of the "far side" SVT 2. Note both dimensions of the SVT. The long leg of the arterial and the short leg of the Drive/ PAAL 3. Make note that the New Curb Access Ramp is to be constructed per P.A.G. standard detail 207 and which type of ramp 4. Make note that any new Curb is to be constructed per P.A.G. standard detail 209 5. Remove and note the removal of the existing driveway apron immediately around the corner from Lee St. 6. Note how the patch/ repair of the arterial street of Alvernon will be where the driveway removal is- Note what type of asphalt will be used for patch-back David Stiffey City of Tucson |
| 11/29/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Ben Vogel Mon 11/29/2021 10:13 AM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0241 DESCRIPTION: Site - Alvernon Commercial Plaza (related to expired D07-0050). 1601 N ALVERNON WY Fee Balance: pending SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW INCLUDE IN RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for your Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) |
| 11/29/2021 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Needs Review |