Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP21-0232
Parcel: 11016221B

Address:
6255 E GRANT RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP21-0232
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/06/2021 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
10/07/2021 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Costco – 6255 E Grant Rd – Accessible Access and Parking Upgrades
Development Package (1st Review)
DP21-0232

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 7, 2021

DUE DATE: May 11, 2021

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 04, 2022.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.1 – The drawings files were submitted as 8.5 x 11 sheets not the required 24 x 36.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – The drawings were submitted as two drawings sets and shall be submitted as a single multi-page pdf file.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – Provide a drawing index that reflects what is submitted.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – The zoning listed is incorrect revise.

5. Review the requirements for Minor Changes to Commercial/Industrial Sites, found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/Minor_Changes_to_Commercial_Industrial_Sites_.pdf, and provide a plan that meets these requirements.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov.

To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
10/12/2021 AWARNER1 LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL
TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination
FROM: Anne Warner, PLA
PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section

PROJECT: Costco ADA
ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0232
Address: 2020 W Prince Rd
Zoning: C-2
Existing Use: Commercial Retail
Proposed Use: ADA modifications

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 12, 2021
DUE DATE: October 4, 2021
COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed.
This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting.
1. Replace the planter and the tree. The UDC requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces. UDC 7.6.4.1.B.1, UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 and UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a.


RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package

YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
Select "Existing Application"
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to
the reviewer's Requires changes comments)
2) Plan Set (or individual sheets)
3) Any other items requested by review staff

If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov
10/25/2021 JPEELDA1 FIRE REVIEW Approved
10/26/2021 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Email from: COTDSDPermits
To: Jacq Powers, Kyle Sherman
Tue 10/26/2021 12:55 PM

Returned for Corrections: DP21-0232
DESCRIPTION: Site - Costco, ADA parking lot improvements. 6255 E Grant Rd.

FEES DUE: $ 346.50
Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW category fees.
A payment is required before your next submittal.

ONLINE PAYMENT
If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees
1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees
2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000
(not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed)
3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank
4- "Continue"
5- In the Pay column - check the boxes
6- "Continue"

REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.)
- Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Permits - click on blue tab and you will see different sections
- Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS
- Documents section - click on VIEW

INCLUDE IN RESUBMITTAL
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to any Requires Change comments)
2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made)
3) Any other documents requested by review staff

Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter

FILEDROP for Resubmittal
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
- Select "Existing Application"
- In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff

Thank you.
Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist

City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services
Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov
(disregard the email response that will be sent automatically)