Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP21-0226
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/11/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/23/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/25/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: AZ Steel & Ornamental Metal Development Package (2nd Review) DP21-0226 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 25, 2022 DUE DATE: April 07, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 30, 2022. 1. This comment has not been addressed. COMMENT: Until Code violation case, T21DV03212, is cleared Zoning cannot approve this DP. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the email address for the owner/developer on the plan. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the phone number and email address for the Owner/Developer listed on sheet 1. 3. This comment was not fully addressed. Label all sections corners. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 – The location map provided is not even for the area of the COT that this site is located in. Provide a location for this site that meets all requirements of AM Sections 2-06.4.4, 2-06.4.4.A, 2-06.4.4.B, & 2-06.4.4.C. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – General Note 4 remove the reference to “AND SUBJECT TO SECTION 11.3.9 OF THE UDC” as it is not correct. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. Zoning acknowledges that you propose exit only on to Prince. Demonstrate on the plan how a vehicle attempting to access the site off of Romero Rd can turn around if the gates are closed and not have ot back out on to Romero. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – As gates are proposed at the entrances off of Prince and Romero demonstrate on the plan how a vehicle can maneuver totally on site and exit if the gates are closed without backing out on to the MS&R. 6. The height provided is not correct and should be 84” to the bottom of the van accessible sign. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Detail 1 sheet 4 provide a mounting height for the proposed sign. 7. This comment was not fully addressed. Show the required street perimeter yard setbacks from the proposed structure to the back of future curb called out under Keynote 34. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – As this site boarders on two (2) streets designated on the COT MS&R map this development is required to either develop to the future right-of-way (ROW) or provide a plan that demonstrates how the development will meet code requirements when/if the ROS is taken. Show the future ROW line, curb and sidewalk for Prince on the plan and demonstrate that perimeter yard setbacks are met. Show the future curb and sidewalk location for Romero and demonstrate that perimeter yard setbacks are met. Building setbacks for both Prince & Romero are based on UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1. 8. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height of the existing building within the footprint. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/11/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 04/29/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The grading plan and water harvesting plan are unreadable and cannot be reviewed, please clean up and resubmit. |
| 05/16/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Previous comment 1 was not addressed - Provide the correct location map meeting requirements of AM section 2-06.4.4. 2. Previous comment 3 was not addressed - With both Prince and Romero being MS&R and having gates proposed at each entrance, show complete on-site maneuverability for if and when a vehicle pulls in and the gates are closed without needing to back out onto either Prince or Romero. 3. Previous comment 6 was not addressed - Show the required 7' clearance from the bottom of the handicap parking sign per TSM section 7-01.4.3.B. 4. Previous comment 7 not addressed - Show compliance with UDC article 7.6.6.C.2 and how this site plan is maximizing water harvesting. There are several water harvesting basins, but it is unclear how much if any runoff from the PAAL or roof tops makes it into the basins. It appears that most of it will discharge onto Prince and Romero. Provide more site detail to clearly show the site is maximizing water harvesting. Clean up grading plan to show how water harvesting is maximized and clearly show that the rainwater discharge off the roof isn't discharging onto the sidewalk. 5. Previous comment 8 was not addressed - This site is within the FEMA Zone Xs and will require a floodplain use permit. Please add a note to that effect on the plans. 6. Previous comment 9 was not addressed - The drainage report and site plan need to include the delineation of the 100-yr floodplain and water surface elevations. The Ruthrauff Basin Management Plan Study has been done and should be used to obtain this information. The link for the study and its results can be found here: https://webcms.pima.gov/cms/one.aspx?portalId=169&pageId=60308. 7. Previous comment 10 was not addressed - Please start a new FUP at our permit application web page: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp. Instructions: 1. Is this for a new or existing activity application? - Please select New Application. 2. Submission Type - Select Floodplain Use Permit. 3. Project Name - Enter a name for your project. 4. Type of Permit - Select Commercial or Residential (Residential is for work on single family residences and duplexes.) 5. Select Street Name from the list. You can type the first two letters or number to get closer to your choice in the list. Then select the rest of the address in the boxes provided. 6. Description of Work - Enter in Floodplain Use Permit for…and then put a description of the work being done or reference the building permit number associated with this floodplain use permit. 7. Complete the Applicant Info. (Note APA# is for applicants with an advance payment account. Leave blank is you do not have an APA account. 8. Complete the Contractor, Owner and Architect/Engineer sections as applicable. 9. Supporting Documentation Upload - Provide a complete cost estimate for the project unless it is for a new build/separate structure. You may also provide additional documents you think will be helpful. 10. Sign the application and submit. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/19/2022 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Kirke Thu 5/19/2022 8:45 AM REVIEW NOTICE Returned for Corrections: DP21-0226 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/Swppp/Floodplain - Arizona Steel and Ornamental Supply. 3585 N ROMERO RD FEE BALANCE: $ 165.00 (Two extra review hours by Fire Dept) ONLINE PAYMENTS ** If amount doesn't match "Fee Balance", check back in a few hours ** https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" YOUR NEXT STEPS 1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW 2. Title your THIRD submittal documents accordingly, example: 3_Comment Response Letter 3. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL to Filedrop: - Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) - Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) - Any other documents requested by review staff - FILEDROP: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - "Existing Application" - "Permit Number" field: enter the number (and any notes for our staff) - Select "PLANS" for all documents Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Certified Building Technician City of Tucson, Planning & Development Services Dept. Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (If regarding development packages, land splits, Thursday Presubmittal meetings) Email regarding building permits and all other subjects: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov |