Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0226
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/08/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/17/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: AZ Steel & Ornamental Metal Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0226 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 17, 2021 DUE DATE: September 27, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 30, 2022. 1. COMMENT: Until Code violation case, T21DV03212, is cleared Zoning cannot approve this DP. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the phone number and email address for the Owner/Developer listed on sheet 1. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on all sheets. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0226, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 – The location map provided is not even for the area of the COT that this site is located in. Provide a location for this site that meets all requirements of AM Sections 2-06.4.4, 2-06.4.4.A, 2-06.4.4.B, & 2-06.4.4.C. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – General Note 4 remove the reference to “AND SUBJECT TO SECTION 11.3.9 OF THE UDC” as it is not correct. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Base on T21DV03212 there is also an accessory use of General Manufacturing on this site. If this is the case add the accessory use to General Note 4 along with the applicable Use Specific Standards and demonstrate on the plan that Use Specific Standards are clearly met. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As both Prince & Romero are streets designated on the COT MS&R plan provide a general note stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R).” 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show the future sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – As gates are proposed at the entrances off of Prince and Romero demonstrate on the plan how a vehicle can maneuver totally on site and exit if the gates are closed without backing out on to the MS&R. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Vehicle parking is based on the primary use. Based on the use listed in General Note 4 the vehicle parking requirements are based on retail which is parked at 1 space per 300 sq. ft. of gross floor area (GFA). 7,556/300 = 25 vehicle parking spaces required. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per 2018 IBC Section 1106.5 the provided accessible parking space is required to be van accessible. Review ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502 and provide the required van accessible parking space. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Detail 1 sheet 4 provide a mounting height for the proposed sign. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Bicycle parking is based on the primary use. Remove the reference to “Storage Use Group” from the calculation. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Sheet 2 Keynote 7 references “SEE DETAIL 2/4” but detail 2 does not address long-term bicycle parking. Provide a detail for the required long-term bicycle parking that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B & D are met. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – As this site boarders on two (2) streets designated on the COT MS&R map this development is required to either develop to the future right-of-way (ROW) or provide a plan that demonstrates how the development will meet code requirements when/if the ROS is taken. Show the future ROW line, curb and sidewalk for Prince on the plan and demonstrate that perimeter yard setbacks are met. Show the future curb and sidewalk location for Romero and demonstrate that perimeter yard setbacks are met. Building setbacks for both Prince & Romero are based on UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street setbacks listed on sheet 1 for Romero Rd are not correct see comment 14. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height of the existing building within the footprint. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). That said. Provide the required sidewalk connection to Prince & Romero Road. This connection shall include the existing and proposed buildings. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. That said. Provide a sidewalk along the south, southwest and west side of the proposed building. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provide a general note stating “ALL SIGNAGE REQUIRES SEPARATE PERMITS” If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/21/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site drawing to include the following existing utility information: a. The location of water lines, and fire hydrants. b. The location and size of sanitary sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. c. The point of connection to existing public sewers. d. Any existing or proposed utility easements e. The first floor elevation for the buildings Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018 |
| 09/27/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Where gates are provided they shall be approved and permitted through TFD. Gates shall have an unobstructed opening of 20'. Gates shall be provided with either a KNOX key switch (If electric) or a KNOX pad lock if manual. Questions: Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov Jennifer Peel-Davis 520-837-7033 |
| 09/30/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, PLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Arizona Steel & Ornamental Supply ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0226 Address: 3585 N Romero Rd Zoning: C-2 Existing Use: Construction Material Sales & Storage Proposed Use: Construction Material Sales & Storage TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 30, 2021 DUE DATE: September 27, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Please provide the correct landscape calculations for this project (there are 2 tabulations) on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 3. Street landscape borders require 50% vegetative cover, this has not been provided, please revise. Additionally, a 30” vegetative screen is required along both streets. 4. A 5’ wall is required along the west side of the property, adjacent to the residential use in addition to the required 10’ landscape border. The landscape border on the west side measures only 5’ for ½ the length of the boundary. 5. The required 10’ wide landscape border is not met, along Romero Rd. it only measures 9’ to 9.5’. Up to 5’ of right of way can be used for the landscape border. If using the right of way, include these notes on the plan; Standard Notes for Planting in ROW It is the owner’s responsibility to keep the Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT), and the pedestrian access area clear of vegetation at all times, per Unified Development Code (UDC) Technical Standards Manual Section 10. 1. It is the owner responsibility to keep a 5’ wide by 7’ tall clear pedestrian access open across the entire property. 2. It is the owner responsible to keep vegetation from growing past the curb line clear and keep a 15’ high clear zone over the travel lane. 3. Final plant locations must comply with all utility setback requirements. 4. The owner understands that if the City of Tucson Transportation Department or any utility company needs to work within the ROW in the landscaped area, plants and irrigation may be destroyed without replacement or repair. 5. The owner takes full liability for this landscape and irrigation, and any damage to roadway, sidewalk and utilities. 6. The only private irrigation equipment that is allowed within the ROW are lateral lines, tubing and emitters that are not under constant pressure. All other equipment must be on private property. (excluding water meter) Contractor to obtain a Right of Way permit prior to construction within the right-of-way. 6. A Design Development Option UDC 3.11.1 may be applied for to modify the landscape requirements. 7. Please label the existing and future rights of way on the landscape plans for Prince and Romero Rds, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 8. Please resolve graphic conflicts on all sheets for maximum readability (specifically the WH-x text). 9. Per Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.D, provide page/detail reference to civil drawings/details that show bike racks, walkways, and screening/retaining walls on landscape plans. 10. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 2-10-4.2.A.4. 11. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening 12. Identify the point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow. 13. Ensure that trees in vehicular use areas are planted within and adjacent to parking so that they afford the greatest amount of shade in paved areas, UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 and UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a. 14. Please add/call out soil moisture gauge/tensiometers and rain shut-off device on irrigation plans and details. UDC 4.2.A. 15. Identify water meter and POC on irrigation plan. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/16/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide the correct location map meeting requirements of AM section 2-06.4.4. 2. Show the correct future MS&R right-of-way width of both W Prince Rd and N Romero Rd. and clearly show future SVTs for both vehicles and pedestrians. Prince is arterial and Romero is collector. 3. With both Prince and Romero being MS&R and having gates proposed at each entrance, show complete on-site maneuverability for if and when a vehicle pulls in and the gates are closed without needing to back out onto either Prince or Romero. 4. Provide sidewalk connection out to both Prince and Romero for both proposed and existing buildings per TSM section 7-01.4.1.A. 5. Show sidewalk along the west and south sides of the proposed building to separate it from the PAAL per TSM section 7-01.4.1.B. 6. Show the required 7' clearance from the bottom of the handicap parking sign per TSM section 7-01.4.3.B. 7. Show compliance with UDC article 7.6.6.C.2 and how this site plan is maximizing water harvesting. There are several water harvesting basins, but it is unclear how much if any runoff from the PAAL or roof tops makes it into the basins. It appears that most of it will discharge onto Prince and Romero. Provide more site detail to clearly show the site is maximizing water harvesting. 8. This site is within the FEMA Zone Xs and will require a floodplain use permit. Please add a note to that effect on the plans. 9. The drainage report and site plan need to include the delineation of the 100-yr floodplain and water surface elevations. The Ruthrauff Basin Management Plan Study has been done and should be used to obtain this information. The link for the study and its results can be found here: https://webcms.pima.gov/cms/one.aspx?portalId=169&pageId=60308 10. Please start a new FUP at our permit application web page: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp. Instructions: 1. Is this for a new or existing activity application? - Please select New Application. 2. Submission Type - Select Floodplain Use Permit. 3. Project Name - Enter a name for your project. 4. Type of Permit - Select Commercial or Residential (Residential is for work on single family residences and duplexes.) 5. Select Street Name from the list. You can type the first two letters or number to get closer to your choice in the list. Then select the rest of the address in the boxes provided. 6. Description of Work - Enter in Floodplain Use Permit for…and then put a description of the work being done or reference the building permit number associated with this floodplain use permit. 7. Complete the Applicant Info. (Note APA# is for applicants with an advance payment account. Leave blank is you do not have an APA account. 8. Complete the Contractor, Owner and Architect/Engineer sections as applicable. 9. Supporting Documentation Upload - Provide a complete cost estimate for the project unless it is for a new build/separate structure. You may also provide additional documents you think will be helpful. 10. Sign the application and submit. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/19/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Kirke Fri 11/19/2021 10:11 AM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0226 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/Swppp/Floodplain - Arizona Steel and Ornamental Supply. 3585 N ROMERO RD Fee Balance: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW INCLUDE IN RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for your Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) |