Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0220
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/03/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/16/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Food Conspiracy Office Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0220 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 16, 2021 DUE DATE: September 24, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 29, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0220, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – There is a “NEW SHED” called out on sheet 3 just east of the “NEW 1-STORY EXPANSION” that the square footage is not provided and it does not appear that the square footage has been accounted for in any of the calculations. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – General Note 7 states that this site is made up of three (3) parcels, 117-05-0200, 117-05-0210 & 117-05-0220, but the plan on sheet 3 and MapTucson only shows one (1) parcel with parcel number 117-05-021A. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – At the east end of the parking area there are gates and if these gates are closed this area acts like a back-up spur, demonstrate on the plans that this back-up spur meets the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. This site is not located within the “DOWNTOWN PARKING DISTRICT”. Revise the calculation to meet the requirements of UDC TABLE 7.4.4-1. Once the correct requirements are provided Zoning will review the proposed parking reductions. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a & 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Ensure that the shed referenced in comment 2 is accounted for in both the vehicle and bicycle parking calculation. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Keynote 39 sheet 3 references “SEE DETAIL J, SHEET 6” there is no DETAIL J on sheet 6. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter yard setbacks listed under General Note 16 are not correct. As this site does not qualify as developing area the street perimeter yard setbacks are based on UDC Article 6.4.5.B.1. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/17/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/21/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/27/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/10/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Show with dimensions how the back up spur will work at each end of the parking area when either side gates are closed. See UDC section 7.4.6.F.4. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/11/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits to: lisa bowers Thu 11/11/2021 4:17 PM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0220 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading - Food Conspiracy Office. Expand the existing building. Fee Balance: $0 (zero) SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW INCLUDE IN RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) |