Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0212
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/23/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/10/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Los Altos Apartments Developm212ent Package (1st Review) DP21-0212 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 10, 2021 DUE DATE: September 20, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 15, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0212, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – General Note 7 states that this site is made up of parcel numbered 106-04-171A & 160-04-1760, these parcel numbers do not match the parcel number, 106-04-176A, that is listed on the Assessor’s info. Plus, this site is a single parcel not 2. If by chance this site is made up of two parcels a lot combination will be required. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least two feet from a wall, screen , or other obstruction over six inches. That said demonstrate on the plan that this requirement is met at the following areas: Along the south side of the access lane that runs east from the entrance off of Los Altos Ave, along the east side of the PAAL providing access to the vehicle parking directly east of Bldg #4, and along the south side of the PAAL providing access to the vehicle parking directly south of Bldg #4. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – If a TSMR for the sidewalk along the east side of Bldg #3 is approved so the required 2’ setback from the building to the access lane/PAAL. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The PDMR for the reduction in parking will need to be submitted and approved prior to approval of this DP. If approved provide the PDMR case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified and if applicable list any conditions. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The setback listed for the “WEST (STREET) is not correct and should be listed as 20’-0” or 1-1/2 times the height of the building wall, greater of the two, as measured from the street property line, see UDC Article 6.4.5.C.1.a. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - The 2’ x 6’ space required for the short-term bicycle parking shown north of Bldg #1 cannot encroach into the 4’-0” sidewalk width. Clearly demonstrate that the minimum 4’ sidewalk width is maintained. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B a sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. That said provide the required 4’ sidewalk along the south side of Bldg #1 and the east side of Bldg #3. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Per ICC A117.1-2009 Section 505.10 handrails shall extend beyond and in the same direction of stair flights and ramp runs. That said the handrail extensions shown at the north and south ends of the ramp shown along the west end of Bldg #1 do not meet this requirement 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – The sidewalk along the east side of the access lane that provides access off of Navajo Rd needs to go to the property line. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/15/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/23/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plans shall show existing and new hydrants. 1 story shall have a hydrant within 400 ft of the furthest part. 2 story shall have a hydrant within 600 ft of the furthest part. Provide hose lay and length on the drawings. Building 2 shows that it has a fire protection line that feeds into the back of the building. This is ok as long as the fire sprinkler designer designs the FDC at the street side per IFC 2018. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 |
| 09/28/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, PLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0212 Address: 3332 N Los Altos Ave Zoning: R-3 Existing Use: Multi-family residential Proposed Use: Multi-family residential TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 28, 2021 DUE DATE: September 20, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. There is a substandard parking space at the northeast corner of the property, maybe this could be a planter instead and tree #5 could be left in place. 3. Please label the existing and future rights of way for Los Altos and Navajo Rd, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 4. A 10’ landscape border is also required for Navajo Rd, but clearly there isn’t room. Is the tamarisk tree going to be removed? Is it possible to replace with another tree there? Please calculate the required plants for the border and place them elsewhere on the property, or submit an application for a DDO. 5. While the trees in the parking lot meet the 40’ trunk to parking space requirement, their locations do not meet the intent of the requirement. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and to do that the length between islands should be less than 7 spaces. 6. Per Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.D, provide page/detail reference to civil drawings/details that show bike racks, walkways, and screening/retaining walls on landscape plans. 7. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 2-10-4.2.A.4. 8. Please add/call out soil moisture gauge/tensiometers and rain shut-off device on irrigation plans and details. UDC 4.2.A. 9. Revise NPP plan to inventory only plants that will be potentially disturbed by new construction. Remove id no. 2,3, and 4 and redo the calculations based on the remaining existing plants. 10. Please identify existing plants along the northeast side of the parking lot, on site or not? RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/08/2021 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | (The ATTACHED PDF mentioned below can be viewed in "Documents" in PRO: "Pima Co Addressing Review Comments, 1st submittal") Email from: <Addressing@pima.gov> To: CDRC Fri 10/8/2021 9:47 AM DP21-0212 , Los Altos Apartments, 1st submittal, is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 11/04/2021 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Add a note indicating the site is within FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area Zone AE and Floodplain Use permit is required for all development. 2. Demonstrate in the drainage report compliance with the balanced basin detention and first flush retention requirements of the detention/retention manual. 3. Show how water harvesting is maximized. Ensure the grading plans and water harvesting plans are consistent. 4. Show the flood water surface contours through the site on the site or grading plans. 5. Show existing and proposed floor elevations for each building on the site. Loren Makus loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/05/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits to: lisa bowers Fri 11/5/2021 2:31 PM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0212 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading - Los Altos Apartments. Fee Balance: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab and you will see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW INCLUDE IN RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) |