Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0208
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/20/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/20/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 08/20/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 08/20/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 08/31/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. Please review the Administrative Manual Section 2-06 for the Development Package content and format requirements. 2. Please provide legible P.E. stamp and signed on all sheets 3. The record number for this project is DP21-0208. Please add to all sheets. 4. Please show project site centered in the map, north arrow, label the site as "this project", scale 3"=1 mile minimum, identify watercourses and move location map upper right corner of the sheet per AM 2-06.40 5. Streets and Roads Note 1 - Please correct "of" to "or" in the first line and show the future and existing SVTs on plan 6. Please provide administrative street address underneath title 7. Please add type of plan on the project title 8. LID requirements total disturb area is greater than 1 ac, more than 10,000 sf impervious area 9. Please provide property flood zone information per AM 2-06.4.7 10. Please provide symbol and legend used on this set per content requirements AM 2-06.40 11. Please provide project overview 12. Please provide assessor's parcel number for the subject site 13. Please specify location of mail service 14. Please correct Location Map. Roads and Project Site are offset. Map on Sheet 2 is correct. Sheet 2 15. Please label road information (private or public), Right of Way (typical on all sheets) 16. Please specify utilities as private or public and label them (typical all sheets) Sheet 3 17. Please specify if the east storm drain ditch is public or private storm drain ditch and show easement if any. Sheet 4 18. Please make all bearing and distance text black (typical all sheets) 19. Demolition work within the public right of way. A separate right-of-way permit is required for work within the public right-of-way Sheet 5 20. Proposed improvement within the public right of way. A separate right-of-way permit is required for work within the public right-of-way 21. Please move the proposed accessible parking closer to the proposed building development 22. The plan shows two proposed accessible parking. The Parking table shows differently. Please clarify and revise as needed. 23. Please revise 18' minimum radius for driveway 24. Please show SF and height of proposed buildings on all sheets 25. Please provide soil report recommendation for the pavement sections 26. Please provide wheel stop on all east parking spaces 27. Please label refuse collection area 28. Provide standard detail call-outs (ex. keynote 12 call out scupper and "flume") 29. Provide sidewalk connection to the southern addition Sheet 6 30. Sidewalk should maintain a 4' minimum clear space taking into account a 2.5' vehicle overhang. Please revise. 31. Driveway minimum radius 18'. Please revise 32. Driveway minimum radius 18'. Please revise 33. Please show future and existing SVTs 34. Please add driveway dimension 35. Please add a driveway width dimension from parking stripe to edge of pavement 36. Please show future and existing SVTs 37. Please provide road information (private or public), label right of way with dimensions 38. Minimum 5' sidewalk along Craycroft. Please revise 3.85' callout 39. Please add dimensions on curb ramp and sidewalk near van accessible spaces. Sheet 7 40. Please provide geotechnical recommendation for heavy and light duty pavement sections Sheet 8 41. Please provide geotechnical recommendation for concrete pavement sections Sheet 10 42. Please provide top of curb, curb ramp and sidewalk spot elevations and grades 43. Provide additional elevations. Typical of all new concrete 44. Provide slopes, flow arrows, and ramp slope Sheet 11 45. Call out scupper in enlargement AA and other locations where it shows Sheet 15 46. It looks like there is storm water runoff coming from the north property. Please address how this flow will be diverted through or around this project. Sheet 17 47. Add arrows to show flow directions 48. Identify existing topography cover 49. Show limit of disturbance 50. Identify permanent and temporary SWPPP 51. Show location of onsite material, waste, equipment storage areas 52. Identify all surface water locations within quarter mile of the site 53. Identify dry well locations Drainage Comments: 1. Please describe parameters used for Total & Peak Runoff calculations, including methodology, and include the calculation sheets in Appendix for reference. 2. Maps C400 & 401 - A portion of Drainage Area 1 from Pre-Developed was removed in Post-Developed and moved to Drainage area 3, making comparison of Pre- and Post- numbers difficult. Please review and revise as necessary. 3. Summary Table - Drainage Area 1 Total Runoff increases from Pre- to Post-, while the Peak Runoff decreases, even with the removal of pervious area. Please review and revise as necessary. 4. Summary Table - The table shows Total and Peak Runoff increase under Post-Developed Conditions, which does not meet City of Tucson requirements. Where does this additional runoff go and will it cause adverse impacts? Please review and revise as necessary. 5. Maps C400 & C401 - Provide flow arrows to indicate where Pre- and Post-Developed flows discharge from the project. 6. Map C401 - Flows from property to the north discharge south, onto the project (within the existing gravel roadway) then flow east or west to discharge. New curb is proposed, which will block flow and cause ponding. Please indicated how offsite run-on flows will be handled with the addition of curb. 7. Map C401/C200 - Numerous "flume with steel plate" across sidewalks are show on Site Map. Please provide scupper/flume calculations to demonstrate conveyance capacity. 8. Map C401/C200 - Existing flows along east side of project appear to be conveyed north along the wall and discharge across the gravel roadway. No new scupper/flumes are shown in this location, will flows overtop sidewalk to discharge via curb opening? Please review and revise as necessary. 9. Maps C400 & C401 - Total square footage of site in tables for Pre- and Post-Developed do not match. Please describe why or revise as necessary. 10. Map C401 - Post-Developed Table shows negative square footage for pervious area. Please revise to reflect actual conditions or explain what this means. Please review and revise as necessary. Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/07/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Palo Verde Behavioral Health – 28 Bed Addition & Renovation Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0208 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 7, 2021 DUE DATE: September 16, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 11, 2022. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.7 – The location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – The sheet index does not appear to be complete as there were 21 sheets provided and only 19 listed. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide an email address for the Engineer, Architect & Owner listed on the cover sheet. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) shall be provided on all sheets. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0208 & DP19-0291, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three-inch equals one mile. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.A – Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – The section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled on the location map. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.6 – As this site is within the boundaries of PAD-16 provide a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 - Per PAD-16 Section 3.3.1 the PAD District is considered a single unified site therefore include the entire PAD square footage and acreage within Zoning and Land Use Note 3. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 – As a general note identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As Craycroft Rd is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R).” 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Provide and updated the “EXISTING PAD DISTRICT BUILDING SF & HEIGHT DATA: table on the plan. The most current table can be found on development package DP12-0291. DP19-0291 can be found on the COT PDSD Property Research Online located at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO/pdsd/. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met. All calculation shall include the entire district. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide an access lane width dimension for the new access lane shown near the northwest corner of the site just west of the existing single-story building. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide and updated the “PARKING CALCULATION”: table on the plan. The most current table can be found on development package DP12-0291. DP19-0291 can be found on the COT PDSD Property Research Online located at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO/pdsd/. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Per PAD-19 Section 3.3 when a portion of the district is redeveloped it shall be brought into compliance with the PAD and or UDC Requirements. As you state that existing bicycle parking meets the number required show the location on the plan and provided details that demonstrate that the existing short- & long-term bicycle meet the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1, B.2, 7.4.9.C & .D. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.6 - 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Per PAD-19 Section 3.3 when a portion of the district is redeveloped it shall be brought into compliance with the PAD and or UDC Requirements. Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located (See Figure 1). Provide the required sidewalk along the north side of the Single-Story buildings located in the northwest corner of the site. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per PAD19 Section 3.3.5.B.1 the proposed sidewalks are required to 6’-0” wide. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – As you propose to allow parking vehicles to overhang the proposed sidewalk clearly demonstrate that the sidewalk maintains the required 6’-0” clear width or demonstrate that a parking vehicle will not be able to overhang the sidewalk with the use of wheel stop curbing or something similar. If you elect to allow vehicles to overhang the sidewalk the minimum width of the sidewalk is 8’-6”, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3. 25. COMMENT: Per PAD-19 Section 3.4.1 Architectural Review is required. Provide written approval from the Architectural Review Board. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/14/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/14/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | Email from: David.Stiffey@TucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Tue 9/14/2021 6:49 AM Comments: 1. Sheet C200- New curb returns on plan; radius - 25 ft per COT Technical Manual. 2. Sheet C200- New curb per P.A.G. standard 209 3. Sheet C200- New P.A.G. standard 207- curb access ramps at both north and south sides of entry. 4. Sheet C200- Call-out new sidewalk standard; P.A.G. standard 200. 5. Sheet C200- Provide a detail for Site Detail Note No. 20, "Asphalt Drive Cut Repair." 6. Call out pavement "structural section" of entry on plans. 7. Sheet C200- Wherever one sidewalk perpendicularly ties into another sidewalk, it must meet ADA requirements for a "turn-around." (60" X 60" not to exceed 2% in any direction.) David Stiffey City of Tucson |
| 09/14/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Plan shall reflect the existing fire hydrant locations Provide documentation of existing fire department access lanes Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 |
| 09/15/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, PLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Palo Verde Behavioral Health ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0208 Address: 2695 N Craycroft Rd Existing Use: Behavioral Health Facility Proposed Use: Behavioral Health Facility TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 15, 2021 DUE DATE: September 16, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. 7.6 Landscaping and Screening - The Unified Development Code (UDC) requires all new development or an expansion of greater than 25% of an existing development submit a landscape plan, UDC 7.6.2. Preparation of the landscape plan shall adhere to UDC 7.6.4. and Administrative Manual 2-10.UDC 2-10.4.1 Please provide expansion calculations, including parking areas. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/15/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, PLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Palo Verde Behavioral Health ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0208 Address: 2695 N Craycroft Rd Existing Use: Behavioral Health Facility Proposed Use: Behavioral Health Facility TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 15, 2021 DUE DATE: September 16, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. 7.6 Landscaping and Screening - The Unified Development Code (UDC) requires all new development or an expansion of greater than 25% of an existing development submit a landscape plan, UDC 7.6.2. Preparation of the landscape plan shall adhere to UDC 7.6.4. and Administrative Manual 2-10.UDC 2-10.4.1 Please provide expansion calculations, including parking areas. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/16/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Email from: Howard.Dutt@TucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Thu 9/16/2021 7:48 AM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation, (520) 631-2030 |
| 09/27/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: A Randolph Mon 9/27/2021 2:46 PM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0208 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/Swppp - Palo Verde Behavioral Health. 28-bed addition, upgrades to the drive and utilities. 2695 N CRAYCROFT RD FEES DUE: $ 3,858.87 Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW category fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENT If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab and you will see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW INCLUDE IN RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to any Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter, 09.01.21 FILEDROP for Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email for Development Pkgs: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) |
| 09/27/2021 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Completed | |
| 09/30/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | View in "Documents" section of PRO: "TEP approval letter", "TEP facility map", "TEP marked up plans". 09/29/21 |