Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0207
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/03/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/03/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | Passed by Loren Makus during the first OK to Submit. |
| 09/30/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: D2 Dispensary – Drive-Thru Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0207 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 01, 2021 DUE DATE: October 04, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 26, 2022. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.5 – Remove the old “DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE PDSD APPROVAL” stamp from the plans as an electronic stamp will be applied once the DP is approvable. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide an email address for the Owner & Architect listed under the “PROJECT DIRECTORY”. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0207, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 – Clarify why there is a large difference in the total site area listed on this plan and the last approved DP13-0148. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As 22nd St is listed as an Arterial & Kolb Rd are listed as Arterial Gateway provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) & UDC ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE (GCZ).” 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Clarify why there is a large difference in the gross floor area for the entire site listed on this plan and the last approved DP13-0148. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Clarify why there is a difference in the vehicle parking provided for the entire site listed on this plan and the last approved DP13-0148. The removal of 5 spaces does not create this difference. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.b - Demonstrate on the detail that the accessible space meets the requirements of ICC A117.1, Section 502. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Demonstrate on the detail that the accessible ramp meets the requirements of ICC A117.1, Section 406. 11. COMMENT: Zoning acknowledges that the UDC and TSM does not address the following comments but Zoning has major concerns in regard to the proposed drive-thru and pedestrian circulation. Zoning recommends that if not all of the following be used: • Interior site signage regarding ped crossing and a lower clearance bar with warning for ped crossing – applicant to contact Heather • High contrast pavement at crossing locations • Grooving or truncated domes – clarify what the “PEDIMAT” is that is listed on the plan. • concave mirrors being placed on the edges of the drive thru for people to see cars and vice versa? If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 10/08/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/11/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/12/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Thomas Sayler-Brown Tue 10/12/2021 12:07 PM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0207 DESCRIPTION: Site - D2 Dispensary. Convert retail space, tenant improvement. 7139 E 22ND ST FEES DUE: $ 346.50 Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW category fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENT If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab and you will see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW INCLUDE IN RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to any Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email for Development Pkgs: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) |