Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0196
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/11/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/11/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | Passed during the OK to Submit. |
| 08/31/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Watermill Express Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0196 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 31, 2021 DUE DATE: September 07, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 04, 2022. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.7 – The project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – Remove the structural & mechanical sheets from the drawing index. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the email address for the architect and owner listed under “PROJECT CONTACT INFO”. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) within the title block. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0196, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map shall be drawn at a minimum scale of three-inch equals one mile 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – The Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 – Add the square footage to the lot size. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Provide the existing use for the existing building as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. Based on available online permit documents, the last approved Certificate of Occupancy for this site is for a shoe repair shop, it does not a appear that the maintain building has been approved. Provide approved permit documents for the maintenance use. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As Flowing Wells is listed as an Arterial on the COT MS&R map provide a general note stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R).” 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Provide the floor area for each building; 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d – As the water kiosk is part of a larger site all calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – If applicable show all existing easements on the plan along with the recordation information. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding Flowing Wells Rd shall be provided on the plan, right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a fully dimensioned vehicle use area. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation shall include all buildings on site, see comment 13 above. Also, until comment 9 is addressed vehicle parking requirements cannot be verified. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.b - 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short- & long-term bicycle parking space calculation on the plan. At a minimum bicycle parking shall be provided for the proposed kiosk. If applicable provide a detail for both short- & long-term bicycle parking. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter yard setbacks are not correct. As this site is on an Arterial designated on the COT MS&R map the required street perimeter yard setbacks are based on UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 & Table 6.4.5.C-1. Definition of Established Area Setback states that streets designated on the MS&R route do not qualify for Established Area Setbacks, see UDC Article 11.4.6. Provide a setback dimension from the proposed structure to the back of future curb. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage and the height of each building and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Demonstrate on the plan that the requirements of TSM Sections 7-01.3.3, 7-01.4.1 & 7-01.4.2 are met If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/02/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). The modification of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for removing the building. |
| 09/02/2021 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/10/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/15/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Cindy Hogan Wed 9/15/2021 11:33 AM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0196 DESCRIPTION: SITE - Watermill Express, water vending machine. 3910 N FLOWING WELLS RD Fee Balance: Credit of $66.00. A refund can be requested now or later after all reviews are completed. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab and you will see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW INCLUDE IN RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your SECOND submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter, 09.01.21 FILEDROP for Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email for Development Pkgs: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) |