Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0174
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/08/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/20/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. Please include pertinent information for both property owner and firm that prepared the geotechnical report on the cover sheet as per Admin Manual section 2-06.4.1 The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 2. Please add a separate line to differentiate between the existing and proposed water mains. 3. Include existing and proposed gas and overhead line types to the legend. 4. Add the proposed fence line type to the legend. 5. The record number for this project is DP21-0174. Please add to all sheets. Sheet 2 6. Please revise site visibility triangles to match what is on the legend on sheet 1. Sheet 3 7. Please provide a Demolition plan. 8. Please add pavement section details for the new pavement and include keynotes. 9. Please include a grading and drainage plan with earthwork calculations. Provide spot elevations at TC, back of walk, and at ADA ramps. 10. Please include a keynote for curb and call out on plan. Include a detail or call out a standard detail. 11. Provide cross sections for driveways with slopes to clarify the drainage. 12. Provide spot elevations at sidewalk to verify the 5% max. running slope and 2% max. cross slope. 13. Please provide keynote for proposed sewer and water pipes and include the type of material. 14. Provide a keynote for the sewer manholes. Include manhole type and diameter. 15. Provide a keynote for trash enclosures and call out on plan. 16. Please include a keynote for the proposed gas line and call out on plan. 17. Please provide a keynote for ADA ramps and call out on plan. Include elevations to verify they are compliant. 18. Please add a keynote for all overhead lines and call out on plan in order to clarify whether they are existing or proposed. 19. Provide a keynote for the proposed rip rap and include a detail. 20. Please provide drainage arrows. 21. Please include elevations at the retention basins and provide details. 22. Please provide a keynote for the curb opening and call out on plan. Include a detail of the curb opening. 23. Please include a keynote for the proposed fence. 24. Please verify that are sewer line slopes are adequate for a full flow capacity. 25. Provide detail/ call out for flush curb. Include TC elevations 26. Provide channel sections and include dimensions. 27. Provide section for dike channel section 28. Provide cross section at driveway west of the proposed buildings and evaluate need for a guardrail and dropoff 29. Please indicate where the offsite flows enter the site. 30. Provide WSE for all basins and Verify FFE's. 31. Please provide easement/ documentation allowing channel to be constructed outside property. Sheet 4 32. PER AM 2-06.4.9 section P, the minimum width of sanitary sewer easements shall be 20 feet. Please revise. Sheet 5 33. The slope at parking stalls and travel lanes is not included in the plan. Please include the slope. Drainage Report Comments: Page 44 1. Provide more detail on Figure 2 including flow arrows, flowlines and additional spot elevation to confirm flow patterns based on grading plan. Show subbasin delineations for areas draining to each water harvesting feature. It is not clear how internal building areas drain. 2. Provide water harvesting calculation confirming retention volume requirements have been met 3. Figure 2 Provide sections details for drainage channel 4. Figure 2 - Provide WSELs in constructed channel 5. Figure 2 - Verify adequate superelevation depth in channel bend 6. Figure 2 - Show limits of proposed floodplain as it is released from the constructed channel 7. Geotech report should address suitability of soils for stormwater harvesting Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/27/2021 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | (The ATTACHED PDF mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.) Email from: <Addressing@pima.gov> To: CDRC Cc: Marty Magelli Tue 7/27/2021 1:13 PM The Place , 1st Submittal , DP21-0174, is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 07/29/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Show the point of connection of each building to the private sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 2. Clarify the identification of the new manholes. There are three manholes called out as MH 4 and two manholes called out as MH 15. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 3. Determine the need for backwater valves per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 08/04/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: The Place at Mason Ranch Apartments Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0174 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 4, 2021 DUE DATE: August 4, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is July 01, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the email address and phone number for the owner on the coversheet. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0174, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Provide the Use Specific Standard that applies to Multifamily as listed in TABLE 4.8-2: PERMITTED USES - URBAN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, R-3 Zone, Residential Use Group, Multifamily Development, R-3 zone within General Note 4, 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – Revise General Note 5 to include UDC Article 5.3Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ). 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – Demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 5.3.6 are met. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – As a general note list the requirements of UDC Articles 5.3.10.A, .B & .C. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Remove the reference to “LOT COVERAGE” from the plan as per UDC TABLE 6.3-2.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 ZONES, R-3 ZONE, NonRes use does not have a lot coverage requirement. Also see UDC Article 6.3.3.C. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – As this site is made up of two (2) parcels, 114-51-1960 & 114-51-2060, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request from with your next submittal. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Provide the zoning for the parcel east of Bear Canyon. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – As a gated entry is proposed at the southern entrance access lane demonstrate on the plan that a vehicle can turn around if the gates will not open and not have to back out onto Bear Canyon. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Based on review of the proposed building plans it appears that the “MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CHART” “TYPE ‘B’ is not correct. The floor plan for Unit #2 shows a bedroom and a den. Based on the definition of a bedroom, UDC Article 11.4.3, Bedroom The term bedroom includes all of the following: 1) Any room that is designated as a bedroom; 2) Any enclosed room that has a minimum area of 60 square feet and has an accessible opening to the exterior of the building in compliance with the International Building Code (IBC), whether termed a studio, family room, study, den, bonus room, or any other name, except for a living room, dining room, kitchen , and bathrooms; and 3) Any room designated as a bedroom for the purpose of any other code requirement. That said, this will add additional bedrooms which will affect the number of vehicle parking spaces required. Revise the vehicle parking space calculation accordingly. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Review comment 11 above and revise the number of short-term bicycle parking spaces accordingly. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – As there are two (2) short-term bicycle racks shown adjacent to each other north of the BLDS #1 detail 3 sheet 5 does not address the distance between racks. Clearly show the required 2’ x 6” area for each bike on the detail. Review UDC Articles 7.4.9.B & .C and ensure that all requirements are met. Until come 10 above is addressed Zoning cannot verify if the required number of bicycle parking has been provided. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.I – The plans show that right-of-way (ROW) dedication is proposed. Clearly show the street curb & sidewalk location based on the dedication. This dedication will need to be completed prior to approval of this DP. For your information as there is no rezoning currently proposed for this site dedication is not required but the site must be developed to meet the future ROW. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – If you elect not to dedicate ROW show the location of the future ROW line, curb & sidewalk on the plan. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide a setback dimension from the proposed covered parking to the south and north property line, Per UDC TABLE 6.3-2.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 ZONES, R-3 ZONE, NonRes to Res Zone the required perimeter yard setback is 10 or ¾” the height of the exterior wall, greater of the two. As heights for the covered parking aren’t provided perimeter yard setback requirements cannot be verified. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage, height and use proposed within the footprint of the buildings on site this includes the covered parking structures. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.3.2 Pedestrian circulation paths designed for barrier-free accessibility for the physically disabled and located within any development are regulated by the adopted building codes. Clearly demonstrate that there is an accessible route to all buildings and to the ROW along Bear Canyon. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Keynote 1 calls for a 4’ sidewalk but as you show vehicle overhanging the sidewalk the minimum width needs to be 6’-6” to allow for the vehicle over-hang. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – There are a couple of areas where it appears that there will be vehicle access allowed to the sidewalk, at the access aisle for the accessible parking east of Bldg #1 and north of Bldg #10, clarify how vehicles will be prevented from encroaching the sidewalk area. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.U - 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – Provide a general note stating “ALL SIGNAGE REQUIRES SEPARATE PERMITS”. 24. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 6.6.3.B Detached accessory buildings are not permitted in the buildable area extending the full width of the lot between the principal building and the front street lot line. That said the proposed covered parking structures shown along the east property line are not allowed a Board of Adjustment for Variance will need to be processed and approved if they are to remain. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/10/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, PLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: The Place at Mason Ranch ACTIVITY NO: Dp21-174 Address: 2945 N Bear Canyon Rd Parcels: 114-51-2060, 114-51-1960, 114-51-197A Zoning: R-3, SR Existing Use: undisturbed Sonoran Desert, SFR Proposed Use: Multi-Family Apartments TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 10, 2021 DUE DATE: August 4, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Please significantly screen back the building footprint, proposed improvements and parking from the NPPP so that the underlying trees/shrubs/cacti can be seen clearly on the aerial. Upon the next submittal, the NPPP plans will be reviewed. Also, it is unlikely that only 9% of all inventoried vegetation on the site is viable. Please review calculations or schedule an on-site review with the NPPO reviewer. 3. Please resolve graphic conflicts on all sheets for maximum readability of native/landscape/irrigation plans. 4. Please label the existing and future rights of way for Bear Canyon Road on all sheets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 5. On NPP Summary of Requirements 1. Revise note that all native plants are required to be preserved in the Scenic Route Buffer Area. Plants can be added for revegetation only. UDC 5.3.4.1.A & D. 6. Ensure that the trees in the parking lot planters adjacent to covered parking are placed so that they will not interfere with the cover. A tree every 6-9 parking spaces does not meet the intent of the requirement of UDC 7.6.4.B, please add additional trees in parking areas so that the ratio of 1 tree per 4 spaces is met, except for covered parking. 7. Chilopsis linearis is not considered a canopy tree. Please provide a species that provides maximum shade on the asphalt. Ensure that trees in vehicular use areas are planted within and adjacent to parking so that they afford the greatest amount of shade in paved areas, UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 and UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a. Parking island within the parking area are preferred. 8. An interior landscape border is required adjacent to residential properties (partial south boundary). 9. Provide a detail of WHA/RET area that shows the minimum 6” depth of the water harvesting basin. 10. The 30” screen along the parking on the east side does not have to be a “hedge” or planted in an unbroken straight line, but does have to provide opacity from views of the cars/parking area. 11. Per Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.D, provide reference to civil drawings/details that show bike racks, walkways, and screening/retaining walls on landscape plans. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/12/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/19/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Marty Cc: Jean Thu 8/19/2021 9:35 AM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0174 Reviews have been completed. See details below. DESCRIPTION: Site - The Place at Mason Ranch, 256 apartments. DP21-0174 FEES DUE: $ 4,502.70 Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENT If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours after it is updated. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" INCLUDE IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your 2nd submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter, 07.01.21 FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then enter permit number) SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab and you will see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email for Development Pkgs: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) Email for Building Permits: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov |