Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP21-0173
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/18/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/08/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Detail A/7 has been removed but C.O. #01 has been changed to a 2-way cleanout (keynote #6 on sheet 7 0f 19). An approved 2-way cleanout fitting is allowed to be used at the junction of a building drain and a building sewer; otherwise, cleanouts shall open to allow cleaning in the direction of flow. Reference: Section 708.1.8, IPC 2018. [Initial comment: The 2-way cleanout shown in Detail A/7 is in violation of Section 708.1.8 (exception 2), IPC 2018. An approved 2-way cleanout is an approved fitting (singular), not a field-assembled group of fittings. Reference: Section 706.1, IPC 2018.] |
| 11/10/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Foothills RV & Storage Development Package (2nd Review) DP21-0173 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 10, 2021 DUE DATE: November 15, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 30, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the DP case number on sheets 11-19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0173, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. This comment was not addressed correctly. Per UDC TABLE 4.8-4: PERMITTED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE ZONES, C-2 Zone Personal Storage is subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.10.C.3 & .6 only not the entire section of 4.9.10.C, revise the note. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The Use Specific Standard listed under General Note 3 is not correct. Review UDC TABLE 4.8-4: PERMITTED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE ZONES, C-2 Zone, Storage Use Group With Land Use Class/Type: Personal Storage, and provide the correct Use Specific Standard. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. Zoning acknowledges that you received an email stating that the Assessor’s office received the combo request. Until you receive an approval this comment stands. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – As this site is made up of four (4) parcels, 110-06-012C, 110-06-013B, 110-06-013E & 110-06-013D, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Assessor’s Combo Request form with your next submittal. 4. This comment was not addressed. Zoning was not able to find any reference on the plan or detail on how the bicycle parking was to be lighted. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate on the plan or detail how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e are met. 5. Zoning acknowledges the approved DDO T21SA00368. Provide the DDO case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide permit yard setback dimensions from the proposed canopies, called out under Keynote 32, to the adjacent property lines. Per UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE C-1, C-2, C-3, OCR-1, & OCR-2 ZONES, C-2 Zone, Nonres Use to Res Zone, the required perimeter yard setback is 1-1/2 the height of the exterior wall. Until comment 6 and 15 are addressed Zoning cannot verify if perimeter yard setbacks are met but it appears that the proposed canopies will not meet perimeter yard setbacks to the south, east and west property line. A Design Development Option (DDO) will need to be processed and approved for the reduces setbacks. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan and shall be submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the wall, see Unified Development Code (UDC) Article 6.4.5.b & Figure 6.4.5-A. 6. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage and height of the canopies called out under Keynote 32. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/22/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/24/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, PLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Foothills RV & Storage ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0173 2nd submittal Address: 4032 E Ft. Lowell Rd Parcel: 110-06012C,-013B,-013D and -013E Zoning: C-2 Existing Use: vacant, previously graded Proposed Use: Personal storage TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 24, 2021 DUE DATE: November 15, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40' of a tree is only one of the requirements. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible, and the requirement is 1 tree per 4 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.1.B.1, UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 and UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/29/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Natalee Perry Mon 11/29/2021 4:53 PM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0173 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/Swppp - Foothills RV and Storage. 4032 E FORT LOWELL RD Fee Balance: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW INCLUDE IN RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your THIRD submittal documents according to this example: 3_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for your Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) |
| 11/30/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Email from: David Stiffey To: CDRC Tue 11/30/2021 6:35 AM Approved. No further comments. David Stiffey City of Tucson Transportation and Mobility |