Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0173
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/09/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/09/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 07/09/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 07/09/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 07/20/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. Please add riprap and basin slope symbols to cover sheet legend 2. Please identify the existing use 3. Please add reclaim water line type to cover sheet legend 4. The record number for this project is DP21-0173. Please add to all sheets. 5. Please provide adequate 3"x5" space on each sheet per AM 2-06.3.5 Sheet 2 6. Please copy area of disturbance info on sheet 10 Sheet 3 7. Please show van stall aisle on the passenger side 8. Please show lot lines, 11006013B, 11006013D, 11006013E & 11006012C. 9. Please provide documentation for work within the public ROW 10. Text size of utility lines should show larger. Please revise all sheets Sheet 4 11. Please show PL and match linetype on sheet 1 (typical) 12. Please show existing trees, fence, wall to remove or to remain. Sheet 5 13. Please show existing SD easement lines 14. Please label "modified" sidewalk scupper on detail C5 since flow goes in opposite direction 15. Please show cross and longitudinal slopes on the concrete walkway and add spot elevations on bldg line 16. Please provide top width and bottom width for sections B, C, and D Sheet 6 17. Please provide pavement edge protection and dimension the distance from property line on Detail G6 18. Verify that basin drains/infiltrate Sheet 7 19. Please match sewer line type on sheet 1 20. Please match reclaim water lintype on sheet 1 21. Please verify whether water is public or private and update keynotes and general notes accordingly Sheet 10 22. Please show existing conditions of the site like contours and flow of the site 23. Please label stormwater outfall, show arrows 24. Please identify the nearest receiving water on this sheet and location map and indicate if the receiving water is listed as impaired, not attaining or an OAW 25. Please check spelling in SWPPP general notes Drainage Report Comments: Page 2 1. Section 1.1 - City of Tucson GIS indicates a portion of 11006012C is located within Christopher City Wash Balanced Basin. Please update and revise as necessary. Page 3 2. Section 1.3 - Recent updates, adopted by the City have eliminated non-designated basins. As such any previously non-designated basins are considered balanced. Please update and revise as necessary. Page 5 3. Table 1 does not match the Onsite Area Spreadsheet in Appdx A (pdf pg 24). Please revise as necessary Page 6 4. Section 3 Screen Wall - Please review spelling and grammar in first sentence. Page 9 5. Section 3 Outflow - Please review grammar in first sentence. Page 10 6. Section 5 Conclusion - City of Tucson GIS indicates a portion of 11006012C is located within Christopher City Wash Balanced Basin. Please update and revise as necessary. Page 20 7. Figure 4 - Missing Q100 discharge for runon from Stash Development. Please revise as necessary. Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/02/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 08/02/2021 | ALEXANDRA HINES | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | |
| 08/04/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit. 2. Revise the site utility drawing to include the invert and rim elevations of the manholes upstream and downstream of the connections to the public sewer. Include the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 3. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 4. The 2-way cleanout shown in Detail A/7 is in violation of Section 708.1.8 (exception 2), IPC 2018. An approved 2-way cleanout is an approved fitting (singular), not a field-assembled group of fittings. Reference: Section 706.1, IPC 2018. |
| 08/06/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Foothills RV & Storage Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0173 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 5, 2021 DUE DATE: August 6, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 30, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0173, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 – Provide all of the rezoning (C9-18-05) conditions on the plan. Also, Zoning was not able to find a rezoning preliminary development plan that is even close to this plan. Contact John Beall at John.Beall@tucsonaz.gov as this may require a major change to the rezoning. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The Use Specific Standard listed under General Note 3 is not correct. Review UDC TABLE 4.8-4: PERMITTED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE ZONES, C-2 Zone, Storage Use Group With Land Use Class/Type: Personal Storage, and provide the correct Use Specific Standard. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Remove General Note 14 from the plan as it is already addressed under General Note 11. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – As this site is made up of four (4) parcels, 110-06-012C, 110-06-013B, 110-06-013E & 110-06-013D, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Assessor’s Combo Request form with your next submittal. 6. 2-06.4.9.F – Clearly define and show the zoning boundaries of the adjacent properties as perimeter yard setbacks need to be verified. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F..2.a.(1) Circulation, Setbacks from Access Lanes and PAALs, Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least one foot from: An open structure, such as a carport or covered pedestrian access path as measured from the closest part of the structure or roof overhang. Demonstrate on the plan that you are either meeting this setback from the proposed canopies, called out under Keynote 32, to the access lanes or demonstrate that you are meeting or exceeding the minimum allowed height per UDC Article 7.4.6.E.2. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per UDC Article 7.4.3.G When the calculation of required motor vehicle and bicycle parking spaces results in a fractional number, a fraction of one-half or more is adjusted to the next higher whole number, and a fraction of less than one-half is adjusted to the next lower whole number. That said, the required number of vehicle parking spaces shown on the is not correct and should be 33. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The IBC reference to “FROM 0 TO 50” is not correct and should be 26 to 50. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate on the plan or detail how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e are met. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – Clearly show the future right-of-way curb & sidewalk along with dimensions on the plan. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Until comment 12 is addressed the required street perimeter yard requirements cannot be verified. Street perimeter yard setbacks are based on UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 & Table 6.4.5.C-1 ADT of 1,000 or greater. Provide a street perimeter yard setback dimension from the proposed building to the back of future curb. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide permit yard setback dimensions from the proposed canopies, called out under Keynote 32, to the adjacent property lines. Per UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE C-1, C-2, C-3, OCR-1, & OCR-2 ZONES, C-2 Zone, Nonres Use to Res Zone, the required perimeter yard setback is 1-1/2 the height of the exterior wall. Until comment 6 and 15 are addressed Zoning cannot verify if perimeter yard setbacks are met but it appears that the proposed canopies will not meet perimeter yard setbacks to the south, east and west property line. A Design Development Option (DDO) will need to be processed and approved for the reduces setbacks. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan and shall be submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the wall, see Unified Development Code (UDC) Article 6.4.5.b & Figure 6.4.5-A. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage and height of the canopies called out under Keynote 32. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/06/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC Fri 8/6/2021 11:06 AM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 837-8040 |
| 08/12/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, PLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Foothills RV & Storage ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0173 Address: 4032 E Ft. Lowell Rd Parcel: 110-06012C,-013B,-013D and -013E Zoning: C-2 Existing Use: vacant, previously graded Proposed Use: Personal storage TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 12, 2021 DUE DATE: August 6, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Please label the rock hatch in the legend. 3. Indicate on the legend and on the plan which plants are fulfilling the mitigation requirement. 4. Please turn the NPPO note into a NPPO table. Note that mitigation trees are in addition to the required trees for landscape borders and parking requirements. 5. Per Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.D, provide reference to civil drawings/details that show bike racks, walkways, and screening/retaining walls on landscape plans. 6. Include parking area calculations for required trees, 2-10-4.2.A.2.c. Ensure that trees in vehicular use areas are planted within and adjacent to parking so that they afford the greatest amount of shade in paved areas, UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 and UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/12/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | Email from: David.Stiffey@TucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Wed 8/11/2021 6:45 PM On sheet 9, detail A/9, have a note that states, "ABC to be compacted to 100% maximum density." (All ABC under the roadway within the ROW must be compacted to 100% maximum density.) David Stiffey City of Tucson |
| 08/20/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Natalee Perry Fri 8/20/2021 11:48 AM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0173 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/Swppp - Foothills RV and Storage. 4032 E FORT LOWELL RD FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. INCLUDE IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your 2nd submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter, 07.01.21 FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then enter permit number) SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab and you will see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email for Development Pkgs: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) Email for Building Permits: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov |
| 09/01/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | (See this letter filed in Document section of PRO) August 31, 2021 SUBJECT: Foothills RV & Storage, DP21-0173 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted July 07, 2021. The TEP Facilities map shows a conflict; however, customer plans do not. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Bianca Maubach New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (OH 204) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-307-3864 Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area Designer Susanne Petty, at (520) 603-2234. Sincerely, Conor Mahoney, Office Support Assistant Design/Build |