Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0171
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/16/2021 | FRANK PODGORSKI | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD DATE | Needs Review | This property is a contributing resource to the Armory Park Historic Zone. Any exterior work requires review by the Armory Park Historic Zone Advisory Board and the Tucson Pima County Historical Commission Plans Review Subcommittee. Once the plans are developed, please submit a Historic application with all of the required documentation. |
| 07/26/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site drawing to include the following existing utility information: a. The locations of main water lines and fire hydrants. b. The location and size of sanitary sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. c. The points of connection to existing public sewers. d. Any existing or proposed utility easements e. The first-floor elevation for the building Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. |
| 07/30/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Ugly But Honest Pizzeria Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0171 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 29, 2021 DUE DATE: July 29, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is July 27, 2022. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.5 - Remove the old “DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE PDSD APPROVAL” stamp from the plan as once the DP is approved an electronic stamp will be affixed to the plan. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0171, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.A – Remove all the parcels from the location map as it is currently unreadable. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property on the location map. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Label the section, township, and range & section corners on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 - Revise Permitting General Note 1 to only address the existing zoning. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 –Add a general note that provides the gross area, square footage and acreage, of the site at 733 S Stone only. A separate development package will need to be submitted for the proposed development at 725 S 6th. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Remove all reference to the uses at 725 S 6th as they will be addressed on a separate DP. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 - Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R).” 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – As exterior work is proposed Historic review is required. Historic application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-application-forms-submittal-requirements. Contact Jodie Brown at Jodie.Brown@tucsonaz.gov. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Clarify what the “LANDSC. COURT YARD” will be use for. If beverage or food consumption is proposed in this area the square footage needs to be provide. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – There is a statement “LINE OF 14’ H SHADE CLOTH” shown on the plan. Clearly show the extents of the shade cloth and how it is supported on the plan. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – As it appears that outdoor use areas may be proposed provide an use area expansion calculation on the plan. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Under “UDC REVIEW” it is not clear what the total use are is for 733 S Stone. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A – Provide bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds for the property at 733 S Stone. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing the public right-of-way adjacent to this site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A – As this site is made up of two (2) parcels, 117-07-203A & 117-07-205A, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request form with the next submittal. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a vehicle parking space calculation that clearly shows number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disable for 733 S Stone. Until comment 15 above is addressed vehicle parking requirements cannot be verified. Once the required DP for 725 S 6th is approved the requirement for allowing offsite parking can be verified. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Detail 2 the sign mounting height should be 7’ to the bottom of the van accessible sign. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.b – Provide a copy of the record parking agreement with the next submittal. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short- & long-term bicycle parking calculation that provides the spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided for 733 S Stone only. Until comment 15 above is addressed bicycle parking requirements cannot be verified. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Detail 4 does not address UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.c, .e, 7.4.9.B.2.a, & .f. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Once comment 13 is addressed perimeter yard setback requirements can be verified. 26. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height of all structures within the footprint of the building. 27. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – It is not clear that the requirements of TSM Section 7-01 are being met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/02/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/04/2021 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP21-0171 1) Include all standard applicable notes found in the COT Administrative Manual (AM) section 2-06, including but not limited to the hold harmless note in AM 2-06.4.7 and Drainage will remain in its natural state note 2) Per zoning comments, a separate development package is required for the proposed work at 725 s 6th av, please remove all details associated with that project 3) Trash enclosure dimensions are incorrect for single container enclosure; according to COT Technical Manual. 8-01.9.0 figure 3B. It is also not clear where this will be placed. Trash enclosure or service location must be provided on site. Existing service location does not meet onsite maneuvering/access requirements. 4) Show on plans waste stream calculations per TSM section 8 5) Provide approval from Environmental Services for proposes single can pick up and identify where it will be placed in the right of way 6) Show on plans and dimension existing Site Visibility Triangles 7) Correct Permitting General Notes, note number 12 to read, "12:1 max slope & 2% max cross slope." Refer to ADA standards 8) Dimension existing and future right of way on plans 9) Show on plans that the existing driveway/wedge curbs will be replaced with new 6" vertical curb. 10) Show on plans the short sections of sidewalk (minimum 4' wide) that will provide an ADA compliant pathway to 6th Av and Stone Av 11) Identify keynote 13. 12) Provide a detail for the "RAMP DN" identified adjacent to the bar area. Include cross slope and running slope John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/09/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, PLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Ugly But Honest Pizzeria ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0171 Address: 733 S Stone Ave Parcel: 117-07-0203A & 117-07-205A Zoning: HC-3 Existing Use: Ugly But Honest Car Sales Proposed Use: Food Service TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 9, 2021 DUE DATE: July 29, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Add relevant case numbers to all drawings, specifically C9-18-02. Please review zoning conditions and make sure that plans adhere to those requirements. 3. Please label the existing and future rights of way for, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 4. Per 2-10-4.2.D, provide construction details or reference sheet and detail numbers from civil drawings that show bike racks, walkways, retaining and screening walls on landscape plans. 5. Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required to provide water to landscape areas, UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0, and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. The Downtown Area Infill Incentive District (IID), Greater Infill Incentive Subdistrict 5.12.9 application may provide an exemption from this requirement. 6. A 10’ street landscape border is required along both S Stone Ave and S 6th Ave. UDC 7.6.4.C.2 and Table 7.6.4-1 The Downtown Area Infill Incentive District (IID), Greater Infill Incentive Subdistrict 5.12.9 application may provide an exemption from this requirement. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/Special_Districts_Application_Revised_3-19-20_FILLABLE_PDF.pdf RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/10/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: John Feneck Tue 8/10/2021 10:29 AM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0171 Reviews have been completed. See details below. DESCRIPTION: Site - Ugly But Honest Pizzeria. Paving, bicycle parking, screen wall, fence, outside bar. 733 S STONE AV FEES DUE: $ 1,206.50 Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENT If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours after it is updated. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" INCLUDE IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your 2nd submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter, 07.01.21 FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then enter permit number) SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab and you will see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email for Development Pkgs: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) Email for Building Permits: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov |