Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Stopped
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP21-0145
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Stopped
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/02/2022 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Stop | |
| 05/02/2022 | ANY | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Stopped | |
| 05/02/2022 | ANY | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Stopped | |
| 05/02/2022 | ANY | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Stopped | |
| 05/02/2022 | ANY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Stopped | |
| 05/09/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Navajo Road Quad Plex Development Package (3rd Review) DP21-0145 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 9, 2022 DUE DATE: May 24, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 10, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. This comment was not addressed correctly. The southeast section at the intersection of First & Ft Lowell should be labeled as 31 not 01 The sections corners shown at the intersections of First & Ft Lowell are not correct. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Label the section corners on the location map. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2. This comment was not addressed correctly. In the vehicle parking space calculation, you state “TOTAL STANDARD PARKING SPACES PROVIDED = 6 PROVIDED” and then you state “TOTAL VAN ACCESSIBLE HC SPACES PROVIDED = 1 PROVIDED” and “TOTAL STANDARD ACCESSIBLE HC SPACES PROVIDED = 1 PROVIDED” would be a total of 8 spaces provided but there is only a total of 6 spaces shown on the plan. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation does not appear to be correct. The calculation states “5 PROVIDED” and the plan shows 6. Also, as the required number is 8 a variance will be required. 3. It does not appear that the future curb location is shown correctly. Based on a future 90’ ROW the curb location is 10’ to the face of curb. Your plan shows “FUTURE INSIDE OF CURB” if this means future back of curb it is not correct and should show 9’-6” from the future back to the future ROW line. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J - As Stone Ave is listed as an Arterial Street on the COT MS&R map and the street is not at full width show the future right-of-way line, future curb & sidewalk on the plan and demonstrate how this project meets code to the future right-of-way. 4. Until the comment above is clearly addressed street perimeter yard setbacks cannot be determined. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – As no building height was provided perimeter yard setbacks cannot be verified. As Stone Ave is listed as an Arterial Street on the COT MS&R map street perimeter yard setbacks for both Stone and Navajo are based on UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1, 21’ or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two. Sone’s perimeter yard setback is measured from the back of future curb and Navajo is measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. COMMENTS: the following comments are relative to an application for a Design Development Option (DDO) (UDC 3.11.1). 5. Per UDC Article 6.3.3.D a Multifamily development is considered a Nonresidential use for the purposes of determining dimensional standards. Per UDC TABLE 6.3-2.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 ZONES, R-3 Zone, Nonresidential Use to a Residential Zone the required perimeter yard is 10’ or ¾ the height of the proposed exterior wall as measured from design grade to the highest point of the wall. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. The minimum setback is the greater of ten (10) feet, or three-fourth (3/4) the height of the structure’s wall facing each interior property line (Table 6.3-2.A). Based on wall heights of 8.37’, south elevation, and 10.00’, east elevations the required perimeter yard setbacks to the south and east property line is 10’-0”, proposed setback to the south property line is 7.0’ and to the east is 6.75’. Design Development Option (DDO) must be submitted and approved to reduce the required setback, DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan and shall be submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |