Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP21-0145
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/06/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/22/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Navajo Road Quad Plex Development Package (2nd Review) DP21-0145 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 22, 2021 DUE DATE: October 04, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is June 10, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. This comment was not fully addressed. The sections corners shown at the intersections of First & Ft Lowell are not correct. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Label the section corners on the location map. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2. This comment was not fully addressed. As you are not providing the total number of required vehicle parking spaces some type of reduction is required. Clarify how you will reduce the number of required vehicle parking spaces. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation does not appear to be correct. The calculation states “5 PROVIDED” and the plan shows 6. Also, as the required number is 8 a variance will be required. 3. This comment was not fully addressed. Per ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502.4.4 shown the required markings on the plan. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The accessible parking space shown on the plan and the detail on sheet 3 do not appear to meet the requirements for a van accessible parking space see ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a mounting height for the proposed accessible parking space sign. 5. Demolition of a building is not allowed to meet future right-of-way. Also your future plan does not demonstrate how the landscape and parking requirements will meet code based on future ROW. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J - As Stone Ave is listed as an Arterial Street on the COT MS&R map and the street is not at full width show the future right-of-way line, future curb & sidewalk on the plan and demonstrate how this project meets code to the future right-of-way. 6. The 14.06 perimeter yard setback shown to the back of curb along Stone does not meet the 21’ requirement and will require a Board of Adjustment for Variance. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – As no building height was provided perimeter yard setbacks cannot be verified. As Stone Ave is listed as an Arterial Street on the COT MS&R map street perimeter yard setbacks for both Stone and Navajo are based on UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1, 21’ or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two. Sone’s perimeter yard setback is measured from the back of future curb and Navajo is measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. 7. The 7.5’ perimeter yard setback shown from the proposed building to the south property line does not meet the 10’-0” requirement. You can process the reduced setback through the Board of Adjustment for the street setback. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Multifamily development is defined as Any residential development consisting of three or more dwelling units on an integrated site or single lot, see UDC Article 11.3.7.3. Per UDC Article 6.3.3.D a Multifamily development is considered a Nonresidential use for the purposes of determining dimensional standards. That all said per UDC TABLE 6.3-2.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 ZONES, R-3 Zone, Nonresidential Use to a Residential Zone the required perimeter yard is 10’ or ¾ the height of the proposed exterior wall as measured from design grade to the highest point of the wall. Again, has the building height was not provide required perimeter yard setbacks to the south and east property lines cannot be verified. The south 7’-0” perimeter yard setback will require at a minimum a Design Development Option (DDO) to reduce the setback. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/29/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole, MH 9858-71. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.] |
| 10/08/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, PLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: 4-plex ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0145 Address: 3250 N Stone Ave Parcel: 106-03-054B Zoning: R-3 Existing Use: Vacant, previously disturbed land Proposed Use: Multi-Family TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 8, 2021, 2nd submittal DUE DATE: October 4, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. Landscape interior borders are required as the proposed use is commercial, multi-family. Provide 10’ landscape borders per UDC Table 7.6.4., otherwise a Design Development Option must be approved prior to landscape approval. 2. Mitigation will be required for removing trees without a permit. Additional 15 gallon trees are required for the site and may be added to any landscape border. 3. Revise Note 7 and replace with “Arizona Department of Water Resource’s Low Water Use/Drought Tolerant Plant List”. 4. Senegalia greggii is a shrub or small tree, which is not a canopy tree. Canopy trees that provide dense shade are required in parking areas. 5. Identify how storm water from parking areas are getting into landscape areas. Scupper? Curb cuts? Identify how the water from the roof is being conveyed to landscape areas. This information also needs to be on the grading/site layout plan. 6. This comment was not addressed, provide irrigation details for equipment. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/25/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/26/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. On the cover sheet by the lot coverage and parking calculations has the area of disturbance as 8,000 sf but up in the notes (note 6) it is listed as 9,100 sf. Please revise for consistency. 2. Add a note indicating the entire site is within FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area Zone AE and that Floodplain Use Permits are required for all development. This includes the grading done under this permit, please start a new FUP at our permit application web page: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp 3. See previous comment 5 - Using the right-of-way for water harvesting requires permission from DTM. Provide copy of communication providing permission from DTM. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/29/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: C. Corrales Mon 11/29/2021 9:18 AM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0145 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading - Navajo Road Quad-plex. 3250 N STONE AV FEE BALANCE: $ 82.50 (one extra hour review time by Fire Dept) ONLINE PAYMENT If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW INCLUDE IN RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your THIRD submittal documents according to this example: 3_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for your Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) |