Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP21-0119
Parcel: 113043540

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP21-0119
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/06/2021 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
09/20/2021 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: 3217 N Mountain Ave
Development Package (2nd Review)
DP21-0119

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 20, 2021

DUE DATE: September 29, 2021

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 10, 2021.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

1. This comment was not fully addressed, add the number of required and provided accessible vehicle parking spaces. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Review UDC Table 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Multifamily Dwellings - 0-70 units/acre and revise the calculation.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Sheet 2 Keynote 11 calls out “SEE DETAIL 2 ON SHEET 3”, there is not detail 2 on sheet 3.

3. This comment was not addressed correctly. The required number of short-term bicycle parking spaces should be 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. Review UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Multifamily Dwellings and Group Dwelling and revise the calculation.

4. The comment was not fully addressed. Demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e are met. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Show the required short- & long-term bicycle parking on the plan and provide a detail for both that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B, .C & .D are met.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – As you have proposed to place the gage mailbox adjacent to the short-term bicycle parking demonstrate on the plan or detail how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.g are met.

6. As dedication is not proposed the site either needs to be developed based on the future right-of-way or a future site plan needs to be provided that demonstrates how all UDC & TSM requirements are met if and when the right-of-way is taken. That said the eastern most parking space along the southern parking area is within the future sight-visibility triangle, and is not allowed within in the triangle. Either demonstrate how you meet parking requires based on the future right-of-way or provide a future site plan that demonstrates how the requirements can be met with the right-of-way is taken. If you elect to provide a future site plan showing how the site will comply a Major Streets and Routes Covenant will need to be record, see UDC Article 5.4.5.F. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.)

7. This comment was not addressed correctly. Per UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A: nonresidential use to a nonresidential zone the required perimeter yard setback is 0’-0” .COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The required perimeter yard setbacks listed under “SITE PLAN NOTES AND CALCULATIONS” for the north south and west property lines are not correct. Per UDC Article 6.3.3.C Multifamily development is considered a nonresidential use. Per UDC Article 11.3.7.3 Multifamily development is defined as any residential development consisting of three or more dwelling units on an integrated site or single lot. That all said per UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE C-1, C-2, C-3, OCR-1, & OCR-2 ZONES, C-1 Zone, nonresidential use to a nonresidential zone the required perimeter yard setback is.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin or Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov.

To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
09/20/2021 SBEASLE1 PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING Reqs Change Email from: <Addressing@pima.gov>
To: CDRC
Fri 9/17/2021 3:49 PM

Pima County Addressing conditionally approves 3217 N. Mountain Avenue, 2nd Submittal: DP21-0119.

Please correct the legal description on the cover sheet as indicated on the 1st submittal RFC. If you wish to have unit numbers issued as part of this activity, please send the floor plans to addressing@pima.gov.
Thank you

Nicholas Jordan, Addressing Specialist

Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-9623
09/22/2021 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
09/23/2021 AWARNER1 LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
10/08/2021 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved Email from: David.Stiffey@TucsonAz.gov
To: CDRC
Fri 10/8/2021 10:54 AM

Approved. Previous comment requests were met. No further comments.

David Stiffey
City of Tucson
11/24/2021 SBLOOD1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change This project is within a mapped flood hazard area and requires a Floodplain Use Permit (FUP.)
Please start a new FUP at our permit application web page: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp.
Instructions:
1. Is this for a new or existing activity application? - Please select New Application.

2. Submission Type - Select Floodplain Use Permit.

3. Project Name - Enter a name for your project.

4. Type of Permit - Select Commercial or Residential (Residential is for work on single family residences and duplexes.)

5. Select Street Name from the list. You can type the first two letters or number to get closer to your choice in the list. Then select the rest of the address in the boxes provided.

6. Description of Work - Enter in Floodplain Use Permit for…and then put a description of the work being done or reference the building permit number associated with this floodplain use permit.

7. Complete the Applicant Info. (Note APA# is for applicants with an advance payment account. Leave blank is you do not have an APA account.

8. Complete the Contractor, Owner and Architect/Engineer sections as applicable.

9. Supporting Documentation Upload - Provide a complete cost estimate for the project unless it is for a new build/separate structure. You may also provide additional documents you think will be helpful.

10. Sign the application and submit.

Stephen Blood
(520) 837-4958
Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov
11/29/2021 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Email from: COTDSDPermits
To: Jeffrey Stanley
Mon 11/29/2021 9:10 AM

Returned for Corrections: DP21-0119

DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/Floodplain - New triplex and duplex. 3217 N MOUNTAIN AV

Fee Balance: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment.

SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.)
- Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections
- Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS
- Documents section - click on VIEW

INCLUDE IN RESUBMITTAL
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments)
2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made)
3) Any other documents requested by review staff

Please title your THIRD submittal documents according to this example: 3_Comment Response Letter

FILEDROP for your Resubmittal
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
- Select "Existing Application"
- In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff


Thank you.
Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist

City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services
Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov
(disregard the email response that will be sent automatically)