Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP21-0102
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/26/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/26/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 04/26/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 04/26/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 04/27/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. A SWPPP will be required prior to grading. 2. Identify the existing use of the property in the General Notes. 3. Verify if this project is in an airport zone. If so, include within General Note 22 stating that the project is located in the Airport Environ Zone and should follow all codes and restrictions. 4. Include percentage and area in square feet of building coverage. 5. Add the General Note "All new public roads within and adjacent to this project will be constructed in accordance with the approved plans. Construction plans will be submitted to the City Engineer's Office for review and approval." 6. Provide boundary data for East side of the project. 7. Update distances associated with bearing N88.34'58"E and N88.34'44"E to reflect east project boundary. Sheet 2 8. Sign details are not located on sheet 20, update Sign Construction Notes with correct detail reference. 9. The signs aren't located within this phase. Please make sure this sheet has been updated. 10. Verify if trails are proposed as part of this development package. If so, add the required Trail Notes to the Cover Sheet. Sheet 3 11. Update construction notes 16 and 17 with the correct detail reference letter. 12. Record Data Keynotes #3 and #4 are not found on plan sheet. Please update accordingly. 13. Include right-of-way width and dimensions for street features on Drexel Road. 14. Reference permit number for plans that will construct the future street and utility improvements on S Thomas Park Trail, between Drexel Road and Street A. 15. Verify if existing gas, electric, telecom, cable, and streetlights have been constructed adjacent to the project site. If so, show on the plans. 16. Include right-of-way width and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, and sidewalks for future improvements shown on S Thomas Park Trail. 17. Call out natural open space and add to Legend. 18. Verify WSEL Sheet 4 19. Verify that FFE of lot provides adequate elevation above WSEL (TYP)(all lots adjacent to wash) (this sheet and sheets 17 &18) 20. Provide contour labels -typ. Sheet 15 21. Include the name and date of the geotechnical report, with the name, address and phone number of the firm or individual who prepared the report. Sheet 17 22. Provide drainage pattern, (spot shots or contours) for future street between Drexel Rd and Street A. 23. Add elevation labels to the existing contours. Only 2 elevation labels are currently shown on the existing topography for the site. 24. Show drainage pattern of east offsite flows as they will exist at the time of construction. 25. Indicate direction of flow for existing channel south of Drexel Road 26. Water surface cross sections do not align with the existing flowline/ 100-year calculated limits. 27. Provide note or detail that shows 2% min drainage slope of pad (1% with exception) 28. Verify WSEL called out as 2821.23 near lot 9 29. Verify Keynote #17. 30. Label contours 31. Provide label for this lot (LOT 9) or basin. This area has utilities shown but is also graded as a basin on sheet 3 & 4 &18- please clarify Sheet 18 32. Update construction notes 9 and 10 with the correct detail reference letter. 33. Update construction note 14 with correct detail sheet number. Sheet 19 34. Provide Volume of basin 35. Provide barrier fencing at basin 36. Based on previous comments, provide information for the lot/basin below basin 1. Sheet 20 37. Correct "D" to "B" Lot in the typical lot grading detail. Sheet 21 38. Geotechnical recommendation needed for 1:1 slope. 39. Where is the back lot slope condition, Detail G, called out on the plan sheets. Confirm where these details are applicable. Drainage Comments: 1. PDF Page 3 - Previous Studies - The erosion hazard setback is located within lots 16 & 17. Please address the impact of this in the drainage report. 2. PDF Page 3 - Development Requirements - Please review the grading plans which show lots 17 & 18 do not have a FFE 1ft above the WSEL. 3. PDF Page 5 - Table 3 - Please explain Block 2 discharges for the 10-year increasing from 4 to 8 and the 100-yr decreasing from 8 to 1.8 4. PDF Page 5 - Please include typical sections in Drainage Report that are referenced in the Street Capacity section. 5. PDF Page 5 - Please indicate the maximum flow allowed per design standards and maximum flow occurring in each segment. 6. PDF Page 5 - Please include basin design information, including volume at 9", Total Volume, total depth, side slopes, etc. 7. PDF Pages 38 & 39 - Scuppers appear to be calculated using the orifice equation. Per the City manual, scuppers act like a weir until a certain depth. Please review the manual and revise sizing if necessary. Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/28/2021 | JVINCEN1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/06/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise sheet 4 of 21: the rim elevation of manhole #7 is obscured. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 2. The rim elevation of new sanitary manhole #7 (2873.37’) is less than 12” below the first-floor elevation of lots 10 (2874.05’) and 11 (2874.32’). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 05/21/2021 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | (The ATTACHED PDF mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.) Email from: Robin Freiman <Addressing@pima.gov> To: CDRC Thu 5/20/2021 12:57 PM Saguaro Trails, 1st submittal review, DP21-0102, is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 05/24/2021 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | Email from: From: John Beall <John.Beall@tucsonaz.gov> To: COTDSD Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 9:21 AM Please close out the Entitlement review folder as Pass. Thank you. |
| 05/27/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Saguaro Trails – Block 3 Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0102 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 26, 2021 DUE DATE: May 21, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is April 25, 2021. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0102, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Zoning acknowledges that the base zoning for Area “C” is R-2. Revise General Note 1 by removing the first reference to R-2 and changing “AREA E” to “AREA C”. Revise General Note 2 by removing the reference to “UDC SECTION 4.9.7B.6, .9, & .10” and add “PAD-3 SECTION III.B.2.D.(1)”. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – If applicable for gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin or Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 05/28/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Email from: David.Stiffey@TucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Fri 5/28/2021 6:25 AM DP21-0102 Approved, no comments. |
| 06/03/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Email sent from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC Thu 6/3/2021 9:25 AM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 837-8040 |
| 06/07/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: DP21-0102 Address: 10090 E Drexel Parcel: Resubdivision of Block 3, Saguaro Trails Zoning: PAD-30 Existing Use: Undisturbed Sonoran Desert Proposed Use: Single family residential TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 7, 2021 DUE DATE: May 21, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section 5. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 2. Please ensure that all related case numbers and this DP number are on all plans. 3. Provide a letter detailing the sustainable measures utilized in this project as described in the PAD, IIIG.4 Self-Certification of Conservation and Sustainability Measures. 4. The Landscape and Native Plant Preservation requirements are subject to the requirements of PAD-30. The plan documents reference a master NPPP for the 30% set-aside method. Please include that document with next submittal. Label all set-aside areas Natural Undisturbed Open Space (NUOS). 5. Provide calculations for the street borders that demonstrate compliance with the planting density within the PAD. Please label landscape border width on all plans. 6. Label open space areas either Functional Open Space (FOS) or Natural Open Space (NOS). Demonstrate compliance with the 5% FOS requirement for each planning area, distance to the Neighborhood Park, and whether a mini-park is required. 7. The Landscape Notes reference a holding nursery for salvaged plants, please locate this temporary nursery on the landscape plans. Note on the irrigation plans how water will be supplied to the plants in the nursery. 8. Detail the temporary system proposed to establish native seeded areas. 9. Provide a description/detail of ground preparation for areas to be hydroseeded. 10. Add plant and irrigation maintenance schedule to plans, per UDC Administrative Manual 2-10-4.4. a. Pruning schedules to show that plant material will maintain pedestrian and vehicular clearances or that the material will establish opaque hedge screens, if required; b. Replacement criteria, should plant material not survive; (already on plan) c. Replacement or upkeep maintenance schedules for inert ground cover materials; d. Upkeep maintenance schedules for exterior hardscape materials; and, e. Maintenance and replacement schedules for irrigation systems. 11. Please clearly label curb inlets to landscape areas to allow water into planted areas. Grading and paving plans should match. 12. Locate the areas on the landscape plan that detail 6 applies to, and add slope stabilization methods for 2:1 slopes, or flatten the slope. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/09/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email sent from: COTDSDPermits To: Ryan Stucki Wed 6/9/2021 9:43 AM Returned for Corrections Notice PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP21-0102 DESCRIPTION: Tentative Plat: Saguaro Trails, Block 3. Lots 1-38 and common areas B (drainage), C (drainage, recreation, landscape), and E (public/private utilities). 10090 E DREXEL RD FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. INCLUDE IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your 2nd submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter, 01.01.21 FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then enter the permit number) SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab and you will see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email for Development Pkgs: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) Email for Building Permits: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov |
| 06/09/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Needs Review |