Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0091
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/21/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/21/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 05/21/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 05/21/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 05/24/2021 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Email from: Jay Gomes <jgomes@azdot.gov> To: CDRC Mon 5/24/2021 10:33 AM ADOT has no comments on this development. Jay Gomes Arizona Dept. of Transportation |
| 05/25/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. Revise Marketplace Drive to Marketplace Blvd 2. Please provide a legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing. 3. Label the project location by using "This Project" callout on the location map. 4. Use a 3"= 1 mile scale for the location map and include a north arrow. 5. Please include a scale no smaller than 1"=400' to the overall site plan and include a north arrow. 6. On the first sheet, provide the name and date of the geotechnical report. Provide the name, address, and phone number of the firm who prepared the report. 7. Please include street names on the overall site plan. 8. Provide Cut and Fill earthwork calculations for this project. Include the over excavation and recompaction recommended in the project geotechnical report. Sheet 2 9. Please include street names on all sheets. 10. Please revise the construction note on Martin Luther King Jr. Way to "Existing Sewer" and make sure that the leader points to the sewer line. 11. Fix leader to callout the existing electrical and water lines. Sheet 3 12. Please include street names on all sheets. 13. Please revise the construction note on Martin Luther King Jr. Way to "Existing Sewer" and make sure that the leader points to the sewer line. 14. Fix leader to callout the existing electrical and water lines. Sheet 4 15. Please include the following information for the right- of-way adjacent to or within the site: name, right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curb, and sidewalks. 16. Add keynote 18 and 21 to all traffic arrows. 17. Add a key note for the proposed bollards and callout on plan. 18. Add a keynote for the handicap signs and callout on plan. 19. Specify the curb type in keynote 1. Sheet 5 20. Please label and complete detail 21. Please call out the standard detail number for the 6" concrete curb. Sheet 7 22. Use block note 1 instead of 34 to callout where the proposed sewer ties into the existing and include it in the "Sanitary Sewer at Building" viewport. 23. Please verify the lengths and slopes between sewer cleanouts. 24. Utility block note 13 and 18 are the same. Please remove note 18. 25. Use block note 34 to callout where the proposed gas line ties into the existing. 26. Include the rim elevation of all manholes and cleanouts. Sheet 8 27. Remove sewer details from this sheet since they are already on the utility detail sheet (C05.2). 28. Add cross sections to this sheet. Sheet 9 29. Provide slope at ADA ramps to verify that they are ADA compliant. 30. Please specify the method of collecting and containing flow for the north east part of the site. Include the direction of flow. 31. Provide drainage arrows to determine the direction of flow between the high points in the drive-thru and to verify that there isn't a low point. 32. Provide a cross section on the proposed drive- thru. 33. Provide elevations at ADA ramp. 34. Provide elevation at back of van accessible curb access ramp. 35. Provide elevations at back of curb to verify that the slope is less than the 2% max. 36. Please add MG to the grading abbreviation legend. 37. Please outline the 24' travel lane. Sheet 10 38. Provide the invert elevation in and out at curb inlet. Sheet 12 39. Revise C6.01 to C06.1 on all keynotes on this sheet. SWPPP Comments: Sheet 42 1. Please show the proposed development. (Panda Express) 2. Provide a scale bar. 3. Please add a reference to appendix L after each of the applicable items in the legend. 4. Add all street names. Drainage Comments Please include in the next submittal a drainage report/statement showing compliance with Tucson Marketplace master drainage plan. Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/03/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Drawings shall show existing fire hydrant. Please indicate the distance from the hydrant to the furthest part of the building as the hose lays. If you have any questions please call or email me. Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 |
| 06/09/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit. 2. HDPE is not approved for use as a water service pipe. Reference: Section 605.3, IPC 2018. 3. An approved 2-way cleanout fitting is a single fitting, not a field-assembled group of individual fittings as shown in details on C04.1 and C05.2. Reference: Section 708.1.8, IPC 2018. 4. Revise the site utility drawing to include the location, invert and rim elevations of the upstream and downstream manholes. If the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is higher than the first floor elevation or is less than 12” below the first floor elevation, provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 8 as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 06/10/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC Thu 6/10/2021 2:15 PM No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 837-8040 |
| 06/15/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Reqs Change | June 11, 2021 RE: DP21-0091 Site/Grading - Panda Express, new restaurant (Tucson Marketplace), 1st submittal, Received May 21, 2021 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP21-0091 Panda Express, new restaurant, Tucson Marketplace; 1 st Submittal, a development package application for a 0.594 acre site, which is located southwest of the intersection of East Tucson Marketplace Boulevard and South Kino Parkway. The property is zoned Planned Area Development 15 (PAD-15) and the project would support the development of a commercial restaurant. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following conditions of approval, as noted below. The below conditions of approval shall be included in the revised development package plan set. Conditions of approval: 1. “According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Notice Criteria Tool, this project area is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. The project applicant shall file FAA Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin for the proposed project unless FAA staff, with the Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA), provides the project applicant with written communication that filing FAA Form 7460 is not required. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp” Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M., Senior Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority |
| 06/16/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Panda Express @ The Bridges Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0091 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 16, 2021 DUE DATE: June 18, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 20, 2022. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Remove all City employees and their information from the Project Contacts sheet 1. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D - Provide the page number and the total number of pages on sheet 15. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0091, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map shall be drawn at a minimum scale of three-inch equals one mile. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B – Label Tucson Marketplace Blvd & M L King Jr Way on the location map. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Label section corners and provide a north arrow and the scale on the location map. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.6 – If the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – Remove all references to “B-III” and “B-III Retail” as “B-III” and “B-III Retail” are not zoning designations. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Provide a general not identifying the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. The existing use should be vacant and the proposed use should be food service. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – There appears to be an outdoor seating area and it is not clear if this is included in the floor area provided under the Site Data Table. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Remove the “FLOOR AREA RATIO” from the plans as it is not applicable in Sub-Area B-III. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d – Provide the required Bridges Tracking table within the DP, contact Elisa Hamblin for a current copy of Excel file. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – Clearly shown all easements of record on the plan along with the recordation information. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide some type of barrier along the west end of the site along the access lane to prevent vehicles from access this area, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a typical parking space detail for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. This detail shall include a location dimension for the proposed wheel stops per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until comment 10 is addressed the required number of vehicle parking spaces cannot be verified. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The bicycle parking space calculation shall provide the number required and provided. 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Until comment 10 is addressed the requirement for long-term bicycle parking cannot be verified. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Based on the short-term bicycle parking detail you are providing 4 short-term bicycle parking spaces, see UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.d. Either remove one fo the racks or revise the calculation to show 4 provided. Also, if the 2 racks are going to be provide revise the detail to show 2 and provide a dimension between the 2 racks. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Revise the required building setbacks for the rear, side & side to read “PER APPLICABLF BUILDING CODE” 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Remove all references to “REQUIRED PARKING SETBACKS” as it is not applicable. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage, height and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Provide a sidewalk from the building to M L King Jr Way, see TSM 7-01.4.1.A. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Provide a sidewalk along the west side of the site adjacent to the access lane. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – Provide a general note on the plan stating “ALL SIGNAGE REQUIRES SEPARATE PERMITS’ 26. COMMENT: Provide a copy of the required Design Review approval letter with your next submittal, see PAD-15 Section C.6. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin or Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/21/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, PLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Panda Express ACTIVITY NO: DP21-0091 Address: 3434 S. Kino Pkwy Parcel: Please add Zoning: PAD-15, sub-area B-III Existing Use: vacant land Proposed Use: Food Service, Fast food restaurant TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 21, 2021 DUE DATE: June 17, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The development package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Provide Case # on each sheet. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Provide a copy of the required Design Review approval letter with your next submittal, see PAD-15 Section C.6. 3. Add a note as to the responsibility of providing street landscape borders along M.L.K. Blvd. per PAD-15. 4. Provide construction details or reference sheet and detail numbers on civil drawings that show bike racks, walkways, retaining and screening walls, 5. Add construction details for tree planting, plant guards, placement of d.g., root barriers, etc. per UDC Administrative Manual 2-10.4.2.D. 6. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 2-10-4.2.A.4. 7. Delete #13 in landscape notes, B&B plants are not used in Tucson. 8. Provide an irrigation plan in accordance with UDC Administrative Manual 2-10.4.2.C 9. Parking area trees shall be located within the property line. If 33 parking spaces are provided, 8 trees are required, every parking space must be located within 40’ of a canopy tree. 10. An unpaved planting area, which must be a minimum of 34 square feet in area and four feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. 11. Add a note that all landscape areas will be depressed 6-9” to facilitate water harvesting. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/22/2021 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | Email from: Peter.McLaughlin@TucsonAz.gov Tue 6/22/2021 8:42 AM We are passing on this one. |
| 07/02/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Ray, Dan Fri 7/2/2021 12:19 PM Returned for Corrections Notice DP21-0091 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading - Panda Express, new restaurant (Tucson Marketplace). 3434 S KINO PW FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. INCLUDE IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your 2nd submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter, 07.01.21 FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then enter your permit number) SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab and you will see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email for Development Pkgs: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) Email for Building Permits: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov |
| 07/02/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Email from: David.Stiffey@TucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Fri 7/2/2021 8:44 AM Approved. No Comments from Traffic. David Stiffey City of Tucson |
| 09/10/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Approved. You may view the following in the "Documents" section of PRO: 1. TEP Approval letter, 09.08.21 2. TEP facilities map, 09.08.21 3. TEP redline comments, 09.08.21 |