Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0082
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/07/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/09/2021 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP21-0082 1) Reference City of Tucson Technical Standards Section 8. Provide Waste stream calculations showing existing/proposed service is sufficient. 2) Provide site expansion calculations 3) For the pedestrian circulation connections to both new proposed containers, provide spot grades, running slopes and cross slopes to ensure ADA compliance. Provide width of each pathway 4) 4) Show future right of way along Prince Rd. using Major Streets and Routes ,Right of Way widening at intersections on MS&R Map (A = 120, B = 150, C = 300, D = 300). John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/14/2021 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/27/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 05/03/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Development Services Department Zoning Review PROJECT: Mobeen Shell – Storage Contain Additions Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0082 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 5, 2020 DUE DATE: April 5, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is April 06, 2022. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.7 – The provided location is not for this location. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0082, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Provide the floor area for all structures on site including the storage containers. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building expansion calculation on the plan. Based on two (2) 80 SF storage containers divided by 576 SF of existing building the expansion exceeds 25%. Based on this the DP shall show compliance with the applicable UDC Articles. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Provide the zoning for the parcels east of Oracle. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a fully dimensioned detail for a standard vehicle parking space and for the required van accessible vehicle parking space or fully dimension the vehicle use area on the plan. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The provided accessible parking space does not meet the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502 for a van accessible parking space. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking spaces shown on the plan allow parking vehicles to overhang the sidewalks either demonstrate that the sidewalks are a minimum 6’-6” wide or provide wheel stops that meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Based on the addition of the two storage containers two (2) short – term bicycle parking spaces are required. Show the required bicycle parking on the plan along with a detail that demonstrates compliance with UDC Articles 7.4.9.B & .C. For your information based on UDC Article 7.4.8.B1.a.(1) no long – term bicycle parking is required for this site. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J – Provide the future right-of-way sidewalks an curb on the plan. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide a street perimeter yard setback from the southern most storage container to the back of future curb, see UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 & Table 6.4.5.C-1. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Provide width dimensions for all sidewalks on this site. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – The vehicle parking spaces shown on the plan allow parking vehicles to overhang the sidewalks either demonstrate that the sidewalks are a minimum 6’-6” wide or provide wheel stops that meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin or Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/01/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/02/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email sent from: COTDSDPermits To: Alex Enoch Wed 6/2/2021 8:29 AM Returned for Corrections Notice PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP21-0082 DESCRIPTION: SITE - Mobeen Shell, two storage containers (T20DV00382). 3601 N ORACLE RD FEES DUE: $ 511.50 Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. Thank you. ONLINE PAYMENT If amount isn't correct, check back in a few hours after it is updated. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 4- Click "Continue" 5- Pay column - check the boxes 6- Click "Continue" INCLUDE IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your 2nd submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter, 01.01.21 FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then enter the permit number) SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents - click on VIEW Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email for Development Pkgs: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) Email for Building Permits: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov |