Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0077
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/01/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/02/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REVIEW | Approved | 04/02/21 The City of Tucson and Sun Tran have no comments. Thank you, Christopher Blue Transit Services Coordinator | Transit Services Division Department of Transportation & Mobility C: 520.260.9558 |
| 04/06/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. Please provide adjacent property parcel numbers on all sheets and this site's parcel number on cover sheet. 2. Please provide name and contact information of firm/individual who prepared the geotechnical report 3. Legend: please move overlapped text Sheet 2 4. Please provide the total disturbed area for this project (SF and acres) Sheet 3 5. Please provide scale and North Arrow Sheet 4 6. Please label the sewer along the north property as existing or proposed and whether it will be removed or remained 7. Please provide scale (example: 1" =100') for all sheets 8. Please add storm drain manhole symbol on legend, and label storm drain on public road 9. Please label existing basin for all sheets Sheet 6 10. Please label earthen channel and reference sheet 11. Sheets C201-C202 Please label basin and reference sheet 12. Please revise Note 6 which should call out ''....designation shown above" Sheet 9 13. Sheets C204, C206: Please label proposed (or existing) basin and reference sheet Sheet 13 14. For All Sheets: Contour interval should be provided in north arrow and scale block Sheet 14 15. Please provide outlet invert for 30" pipe storm drain at the basin outlet 16. Sheets C301 to C307, please provide flow direction and surface slopes 17. Please provide callout detail for proposed scupper. Sheet 15 18. Sheets C302-C303: Please review design. It looks like the site fence is located on the slope of the landscape water harvesting basin. Signs are located on slope of basin Sheet 20 19. Please provide key elevations for spillway and storm drain pipes Sheet 25 20. Detail 7: Please provide reference sheet number SWPPP Comments: Sheet 129 1. Please provide Stabilized Construction Entrance Detail Sheet 130 2. Please label: Boundary of property, existing structures, areas of soil disturbed and areas that will not be disturbed, location of all potential pollutant-generating activities, on-site material, waste, stockpile, or equipment storage areas and other supporting activities, existing basins, and location of temporary and permanent storm water control measures. 3. Please provide scale (example: 1" =40') Drainage Comments: Sheet 9 1. Verify table values for CP-300, CP-600 and CP-1200 Sheet 36 2. Add bar scale and surface flow arrows to map Sheet 40 3. Provide a single figure which includes all relevant proposed conditions data (flow arrows, concentration points, basin locations and flow data, hydraulic structures, watershed boundaries and designations etc) Sheet 41 4. Verify Q at CP-300 and 42.6 cfs at SD-B outlet 5. What happens to all the offsite flows from the north shown on the existing conditions map? This does not seem to be accounted for in proposed conditions. 6. Delineate area draining to each basin 7. Call out all existing and proposed drainage structures along Country Club Road including what appear to be proposed scuppers at CP-1500 and CP-1900. Provide sizing calcs for these structures Sheet 69 8. Please add stormdrain profiles with HGL to appendix Sheet 83 9. Based on Developed Conditions figure the area for the retention volume calc should be about 40.4 acres. Please verify. 10. Provide additional information on calculation of retention volume (ie overall percent impervious, selection of C values etc) Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/27/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Development Services Department Zoning Review PROJECT: FedEx Ground Colocation, Station #857 – Parking Expansion Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0077 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 27, 2021 DUE DATE: April 29, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is March 31, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0077, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building and vehicle use area expansion calculation on the plan. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – Provide the recordation information for all existing easements shown on the plan. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E – As this site is made up of four (4) parcels, 140-41-8660, 140-41-867A, 140-41-1300 & 140-41-131A a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo request form with the next submittal. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Demonstrate how the requirement of UDC Article 7.4.6.I are met for the turnaround called out under Site Plan Keynote 14. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Demonstrate how the requirement of UDC Article 7.4.6.H are met for the turnaround called out under Site Plan Keynote 14. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – If applicable show all proposed easements on the plan along with the recordation information. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. That said provide a sidewalk out to Country Club Rd. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – Provide a general note on the plan stating “A SIGNAGE REQUIRES SEPARATE PERMIT”. 12. COMMENT: Development Package DP14-0030 will need to be finaled prior to approval of this DP. Contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov to have the permit extended and then call in the required inspections. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Steve Shields at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov. My email will return an automatic response stating that I have retired but I am currently working as a contract employee and will respond to your questions via email regarding this review. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/29/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/12/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 05/14/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Email from: David.Stiffey@TucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Thu 5/13/2021 8:07 AM Approved. David Stiffey, Program Coordinator City of Tucson, Transportation & Mobility |
| 05/18/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, PLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Ordinance Review Section PROJECT: DP21-0077 Address: 3350 E Westco Place Zoning: I-1 Existing Use: FedEx Proposed Use: FedEx Ground ColocationParking Lot Expansion TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 12, 2021 DUE DATE: April 26, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11, City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) Article 7.7 Native Plant Preservation, 7.6 Landscaping and Screening, and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 2. Sheet N.1.0 and N.1.1 - Please replace aerial with one that is current within three years of submittal date. Administrative Manual 2-11.4.4.A. 3. Sheet N.1.1 - Show on-site location of temporary holding area, Administrative Manual 2-11.4.5. Please include method and schedule for plant irrigation in holding area. 4. Sheet N.1.0 and N.1.1 Please identify areas in the southwest corner and mid-section of the property, outside of grading limits? Are they NUOS? 5. All parking spaces must be with 40’ of a canopy tree. Ensure that trees in vehicular use areas are planted within and adjacent to parking so that they afford the greatest amount of shade in paved areas, UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 and UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a. 6. Celtis reticulata untrained is not a canopy tree, UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a. Provide training instructions to form a canopy tree or consider using a more typical canopy species in vehicular parking area. 7. Sheet L1.7 – Some line types are not identifiable, please provide a key or label. 8. A minimum 10’ wide landscape street border that includes a 5’ screen is required along Corona Road and a 30” screen is required along S. Country Club, Table 7.6.4-1. 9. The landscape border must be measured from the future right of way for Country Club Blvd., please show the future right of way, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 10. Please label the Individual WHIA on the plan. If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4969. |
| 05/19/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email sent from: COTDSDPermits To: Bruce Puffer Wed 5/19/2021 10:26 AM Returned for Corrections Notice PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP21-0077 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/Swppp - FedEx Ground, parking lot expansion. 3350 E WESTCO PL FEES DUE: $ 7,462.96 Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. Thank you. ONLINE PAYMENT If amount isn't correct, check back in a few hours after it is updated. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 4- Click "Continue" 5- Pay column - check the boxes 6- Click "Continue" INCLUDE IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your 2nd submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter, 01.01.21 FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then the permit number) SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on “View” Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email for Development Pkgs: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov Email for Building Permits: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov |