Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP21-0073
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/26/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/26/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 03/26/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 03/26/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 03/30/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. The project geotechnical report only contains pavement recommendations. Standard required site recommendations, that includes but not limited to grading and utilities, need to be addressed within the report. Identify all on/off site discharge and acceptance points. Sheet 3 2. Identify all on/off site discharge and acceptance points. Identify locations of all proposed drainage channels. 3. Engineer to verify any existing easements currently recorded on the property. Show and label all existing easements, otherwise, place a note on the plans stating no existing easements are located on the property. All proposed easements are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. 4. North arrow, contour interval and scale located in upper right, each sheet. Sheet 12 5. Wilmot Road needs to be labeled in more detail: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks Sheet 14 6. Label size of existing sewer and water pipe at proposed point of connection. Label proposed distance from existing water and sewer systems to the proposed on-site water and sewer systems . 7. Label size of prop water line, typ. Sheet 15 8. Label size of existing water line located in Wilmot Road Sheet 17 9. Provide FL elev at matchpoints (typ all sheets) Sheet 18 10. Provide Flowline of 3:1 v-ditch at matchline 11. Add keynote at CB-1.1A Sheet 19 12. Provide bleeder pipe or documentation that basin will drain/percolate adequately. Sheet 20 13. Label H:V for all proposed slopes. 14. Floodplain review to check if water surface contours exceed 200'. Show water surface contour linetype in legend. 15. Please identify the erosion hazard setback in the detail for lots abutting the floodplain (all sheets as needed) 16. Provide bleeder pipe or documentation that basin will drain/percolate adequately. 17. Provide call-out/dimension of rip rap located between lots 167 and 168. Sheet 22 18. Show how the slope/Common Area/Landscaping will be maintained after future ADOT dedication (all sheets as needed) 19. Show how will 8' noise wall be maintained (all sheets as needed) Sheet 24 20. Bleeder pipe needed, drainage basin -3 Sheet 25 21. Elevation at rip rap pad, discharge from Storm Drain Run-D. Sheet 26 22. Pipe between CB-1.1a and CB-1.1BP is 42" on plan and 48" in report and calcs. Please revise 23. Verify structure callout in table for CB-2.4 Sheet 32 24. Label the existing type of cover (forest, pasture, pavement, etc) Label area of the property that will not be disturbed Label the drainage of flow onto the site from offsite flow. Label all discharge points from the site (from off-site street and 4th basin near Wilmot commercial center) Label permanent stormwater control measures. Show locations of on-site material, waste, borrow areas, or equipment storage areas on site map. Show locations of all potential pollutant-generating activities (concrete washout area, vehicle fueling/maintenance area) 25. Label site discharge location for discharge of offsite street that connects development to Wilmot Rd. 26. Label site discharge location for basin located adjacent to Wilmot Commercial Center Drainage Comments: Sheet 10 1. Add retention volume summary and pre and post peak discharges for 2-, 10- and 100-year events 2. Q100 in table does not match basin routing output 3. Check ponding depth for Basin 3.0 in summary table 4. Outlet elevation in basin summary table does correlate with basin stage/storage table 5. It is unclear how Basin 3 operates as it appears to be two distinct basins. Please clarify. Sheet 11 6. Basin 4 is depicted on the grading plans but is not included in the basin summary table data or the Proposed Conditions Map Sheet 15 7. Add section on street capacity calcs and state City criteria is met at all locations Sheet 26 8. Figure 3 is cutoff in PDF Sheet 28 9. Add Q to Run 1A label Sheet 29 10. Add inlet pipe and concentration point at upstream end of stormdrain Run D 11. There is a swale on the Proposed Conditions map behind Lot 2 and Lot 3 which does not appear on the grading plan. Please clarify the design Sheet 130 12. Need 2- and 10-year routing calcs in Apendix B.5 Sheet 131 13. Required retention volume = 80,254 CF (per calc), only 61,650 reported in basin calc sheets Sheet 135 14. Add missing elevation value in stage/storage table Sheet 154 15. Ground elevation at CP 2.5 not consistent with plans Sheet 159 16. Some values in summary table not consistent with plans Sheet 161 17. Some values in in profile plot not consistent with plans Sheet 163 18. Some values in summary table not consistent with plans 19. What is source of Q at AW042? Sheet 171 20. Verify curb opening length in inlet calc. Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/31/2021 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Reqs Change | 03/31/21 ADOT's South Central District Office and Southern Regional Traffic Department have reviewed the request and have the following comments: Per ADOT's Regional Traffic Engineer Jay Gomes We provided the I-10 DCR to the Consultant/Developer for their knowledge and awareness. This is a general comment that should be made to the COT process. We have reviewed the TIA and provided comments. We have not approved the TIA. As a result, when ADOT goes to reconstruct I-10 in this area, the City of Tucson should have already built the Los Reales extension from Craycroft Road, as the Developer's connection to the Frontage Road is planned to be eliminated based on Access Control needs of the Department. Also, the Garden Stone connection is within the 660' RDG requirement for full access, although it is close at 620'. Per South Central District Engineers: Future conditions show no frontage road for future corridor plans; just auxiliary lanes. therefore access point(s) will not be granted on the frontage road. Further Review by the South Central District will need to be done to address concerns at the Garden Stone intersection. Further information regarding ADOT's future improvements along the I-10 corridor can be found at the following link below. https://azdot.gov/node/14424 Richard La Pierre, Permits Supervisor, South Central District 1221 South Second Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85713 520.388.4234 (office), 520.307.5893 (cell) RLaPierre@azdot.gov |
| 04/12/2021 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Reqs Change | C9-21-01 rezoning ordinance approval required prior to development package approval and permit issuance. Also, if rezoning opted for direct ordinance (one Mayor and OCuncil meeting), then a CDRC letter will be written and sent to John Beall and applicant once the development package has reached conditional-approval. Alexandra Hines alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/12/2021 | ALEXANDRA HINES | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Approved | AVP must be submitted as revision to DP21-0073 prior to building permit application. PMP not required. Alexandra Hines alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/15/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide the first-floor elevations of the proposed buildings. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 2. Provide the rim elevation for manhole MH-23. |
| 04/26/2021 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | (The ATTACHED PDF mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.) Email sent from: Robin Freiman <Addressing@pima.gov> To: CDRC Mon 4/26/2021 1:10 PM Blackhawk Ranch, 1st submittal review, DP21-0073, Tentative Plat is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 04/26/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Development Services Department Zoning Review PROJECT: Blackhawk Ranch FLD Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0073 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 26, 2021 DUE DATE: April 26, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is March 25, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the phone number and email address for the Owner listed on sheet 1. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.A – Provide “A FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT” within the title block on all sheets. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0073, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the administrative street address adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – Revise Zoning and Land Use Note 1 to include existing zoning of C-2. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 – Provide the rezoning case number, C9-21-01, within Zoning and Land Use Note 1. Until the rezoning has be effectuated Zoning cannot approve this development package. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 – Provide the rezoning conditions on the plans, addition comments maybe forth coming. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 – Provide the rezoning case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As I-10 is listed as a “STATE & INTERSTATE ROUTE” on the COT MS&R map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R).” 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The “GUEST PARKING” requirement shown under “FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT DATA: is not correct and as on street vehicle parking is proposed should be listed as 0.25 spaces per dwelling unit. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements shown as “PER SEPARATE INSTRUMENT” will need to be recorded prior to approval of this DP. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Detail 4 sheet 27 “LOT SETBACK DETAIL” is not correct. As this subdivision meets the requirements of developing area setbacks the street perimeter yard should be listed as 21’ or the height of the building exterior wall, greater of the two, measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane, see UDC Article 6.4.5.C,2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1. Also, per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.b the distance required from garage to sidewalk is 19’-0” and 18’-0” to property line. The “5’ SIDE BLDG.” and “10’ REAR BLDG” setback listed are not correct. Setbacks along interior lot lines should be listed as “TO THE EXTEND PEMITTED BY THE CITY’S ADOPTED BUILDING CODE, UDC Article 8.7.3.L.1, and perimeter yards along FLD project site boundaries are required “IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SITE’S UNDERLYING ZONE AS PROVIDED IN UDC ARTILE 6.3.4, DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS AND EXCEPTIONS TABLES”, UDC Article 8.7.3.K.1. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Revised “FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT DATA” note 1 to reflect the correct perimeter yard information for the “PERIMETER SETBACKS”, see UDC Article 8.7.3.K.1. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The proposed “8’ HIGH NOISE BARRIER WALL” called out under “CONSTRUCTION KEY NOTE” 28 is required to meet perimeter yard setbacks, see UDC Article 6.6.2.I unless you can demonstrate that the wall meets one of the exceptions. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 2-06.5.3 Additional Information The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable: 18. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.C – The square footage of functional open space listed on sheet 13 is different than what is listed under “FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT DATA” note 5. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.D – Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits; 20. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.E – An architectural variation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.1. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.E.1 – Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide architectural variation. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Steve Shields at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov. My email will return an automatic response stating that I have retired but I am currently working as a contract employee and will respond to your questions via email regarding this review. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/26/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Reqs Change | Email from: Howard Dutt To: CDRC Mon 4/26/2021 2:15 PM The Zoning Examiners report of the C9-21-01 Blackhawk - Wilmot and I-10 SH and C-2 to R-1 includes the following section. The Tucson Parks and Recreation Department has not been contacted regarding this requirement and no greenway improvements are evident on these plans. ---------------------------------------------------- Recreation/Pima Regional Trails System Master Plan – Four recreation areas, totaling 1.97 acres, are proposed within the rezoning area. Review of the rezoning case by Pima County Natural Resources Parks and Recreation, and City of Tucson Parks and Recreation indicates there are two proposed C9-21-01 Blackhawk – Wilmot and I-10 SH and C-2 to R-1 (Ward 5) CITY HALL· 255 W. ALAMEDA • P.O. BOX 27210 • TUCSON,AZ 85726-7210 (520) 791-4174 Page 5 trails, the Rodeo Wash Greenway and the Wilmot Greenway, which are affected in part by the project. In January, 2011, the Pima County Board of Supervisors reviewed and approved the Pima Regional Trail System Master Plan, which set forth 2,275 miles of proposed trails and their configurations. These proposed trails are part of the Pima Regional Trails System Master Plan. In December 2010, The City of Tucson also approved the Trails Plan. Pima County Natural Resources Parks and Recreation Department recommends that these greenways be constructed as part of the project. The greenways should consist of a 12-foot-wide trail, designed per specifications detailed in the Pima Regional Trail System Master Plan, and with native vegetation within the rezoning site and along the small part of the Wilmot Road frontage near the east entrance drive. The developer should discuss the location and design of Greenway trails with Pima County Natural Resources Parks and Recreation Department, and City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department. ------------------------------------------- Howard B. Dutt, RLA, Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation, (520) 837-8040 |
| 04/27/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Reqs Change | April 26, 2021 RE: DP21-0073 Blackhawk Ranch, 1st submittal review, Tentative Plat, Received March 26, 2021 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP21-0073 Blackhawk Ranch; 1st Submittal, a tentative plat application for a 86.72 acre site, site which is located southwest of the intersection of South Wilmot Road and Interstate 10. The property is zoned Commercial Zone 2 (C-2) and Suburban Homestead Zone (SH) but is proposed to be rezoned to Residence Zone 1 (R-1) as part of a pending rezoning case with the City of Tucson, C9-21-01. This rezoning would support the development of a single family residential development. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following conditions of approval, as noted below. These conditions are provided with the understanded that the associated rezoning case, C9-21-01, will be approved. The below conditions of approval shall be included in the revised tentative plat plan set. Conditions of approval: 1. "According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Notice Criteria Tool, this project area is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. As the project site develops every project applicant shall file FAA Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin for every proposed project unless FAA staff, with the Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA), provides the project applicant with written communication that filing FAA Form 7460 is not required. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp" 2. "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit and before any proposed subdivision of the property, but no later than seven (7) business days after the City's approval of the proposed Rezoning, the property owner/developer/applicant shall record the TAA approved Avigation Easement form which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided. The current property owner/developer/applicant or other person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded send a complete copy of the recorded easement document, which contains all pages which were recorded, to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Senior Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756" 3. "Applicable to residential uses only a. The property owner/developer/applicant shall provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with all new unit purchases. In the event the development of any residential uses does not involve the sale of new units, but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental unit shall be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the new residents that they are living near an airport. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided. The property owner (for itself or its tenants) shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to the Tucson Airport Authority within ten (10) days of signature, using the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Senior Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756" Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M., Senior Airport Planner |
| 05/11/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Plans shall show the fire hydrants. Also please show the radius of the interior of the culdesac. If the houses are to have fire sprinklers please note on the drawings. If the houses will exceed 3,600 square feet we will need that information as well. Jennifer.Peel-Davis@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 |
| 05/14/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | Email from: TEPDEVREV@tep.com To: CDRC Fri 5/14/2021 1:59 PM Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed the preliminary plat, submitted March 26th, 2021. Easements for (TEP) facilities, as identified on the preliminary drawing, must be shown on the final plat and provided to TEP for review prior to final submittal. Tucson Electric Power Co. Land Resources Department |
| 05/14/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Email from: David.Stiffey@TucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Thu 5/13/2021 8:07 AM Approved. David Stiffey, Program Coordinator City of Tucson, Transportation & Mobility |
| 05/24/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Ordinance Review Section PROJECT: DP21-0073 Address: 7720 S Wilmot Rd, 140-44-009D, BlackHawk Ranch Zoning: SH existing, proposed R-1, subject to rezoning approval Existing Use: Mostly Undisturbed Sonoran Desert Proposed Use: Residential Subdivision TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 24, 2021 DUE DATE: April 26, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11, City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) Article 7.7 Native Plant Preservation, 7.6 Landscaping and Screening, and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 2. Please ensure that all related case numbers and this DP number are on all plans. 3. The title of the plan set should be “Native Plant Preservation Plan”, please remove “Plant Methodology” or rename to Plant Inventory. 4. Please label and outline areas in the Rodeo Wash “Natural Undisturbed Open Space or NUOS” if intended that way. If not, identify what it is intended for and provide square footage of areas not inventoried and to be left undisturbed. Provide square footage of common areas. 5. Identify location of temporary nursery and how salvaged plants will be irrigated. 6. Identify pipe that transects road, turf and landscape areas, sheet 49. 7. Clarify the intent on sheet 51 to overseed the d.g. in the landscape border. 8. On sheet 52, is it the intent to have d.g. in the drainage channel? If so, how will it be prevented from washing away? On the same page, there is a typical note referencing d.g. between sidewalk and curb, but the arrow is pointing to the top of slope in the detention basin. 9. Correct transparency level on sheet 57 in upper left corner at matchline area. Identify drainage structures. 10. Provide specifications for hydroseeding and ground preparation (sheet 59). Identify clearly where hydroseeding and decomposed granite will be placed. 11. Dimension sidewalk in functional open space areas. 12. Please identify the turf selection in the plant legend. 13. Please provide a detail for the 6’ wall within the landscape borders. 14. Describe the temporary irrigation system to establish hydroseeded areas. 15. Note on plans that indicate that all landscape areas will be depressed 6” to facilitate water harvesting on site. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4969. |
| 05/27/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email sent from: COTDSDPermits To: Linda Thompson Thu 5/27/2021 1:42 PM Returned for Corrections Notice PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP21-0073 DESCRIPTION: Tentative Plat/FLD - Blackhawk Ranch, SFR Subdivision. 7720 S WILMOT RD FEES DUE: $ 15,949.68 (image is below) Please pay at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees. A payment is required before your next submittal. Thank you. ONLINE PAYMENT If amount isn't correct, check back in a few hours after it is updated. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 4- Click "Continue" 5- Pay column - check the boxes 6- Click "Continue" INCLUDE IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your 2nd submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter, 01.01.21 FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then enter the permit number) SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents - click on VIEW Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email for Development Pkgs: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) Email for Building Permits: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov |