Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0062
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/11/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/16/2021 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/26/2021 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP21-0062 1) Sheet 5. Double check all stated building areas. Building areas shown in site plan do not match building areas presented in adjacent tables. For example, Building 3 is drawn as 3993 sqft, but in the "Article 7" table is shown as 3393 2) Sheet 5 waste stream calculations. Please update to show correct building square footage. For example, office is shown at 2500 sqft where in the "Article 7" table it is shown as 2335. Include porch area for office building 3) Sheet 6 detail 4, reference PAG standard 303-3.02 and 205-3.04 latest editions specify a higher compaction standard that currently shown. 4) Sheet 5. Update basis of elevation to reference a City established benchmark 5) Sheet Detail 8. Keynotes 5 and 6 do not match and are not shown in the site plan on sheet 5. Update as needed 6) Provide a complete pedestrian circulation path according to TSM section 7 for the new buildings to Tanque Verde and Wrightstown Rd 7) Provide a dimension for the office building porch showing a minimum 4' pedestrian walkway is maintained 8) Provide spot grades along pedestrian circulation path, top of curb and bottom of curb to show separation and ADA compliance 9) For future driveway entrance off of Wrightstown Rd show a radius of 25'. Also show Site visibility triangles 10) Show on plans roof drains and ensure that roof drains, from the new building, scupper underneath sidewalks as needed. Reference COT Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 7-01.4.1.e. 11) Sheet 6, Detail 8 show that the cross slope in both direction is 2% including hatched area 12) Sheet 6 detail 3, provide PAG detail being referenced. compaction standard appears to be incorrect John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/06/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 04/12/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Development Services Department Zoning Review PROJECT: City Restoration Inc. Development Package (1st Review) DP10-0062 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 12, 2021 DUE DATE: April 09, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is March 10, 2022. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – Provide an index of all sheets provided in the Development Package (DP) on the first sheet or remove the survey from the plan set as it is not required. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – If the survey sheets are to remain in the DP plan set revise the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) to match what is submitted, see comment #1.. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0 , adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.A – Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area on the location map. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B – On the location map you show the southern most street as “SABINO CANYON” and it should be labeled Tanque Verde Road. 6. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As both Tanque Verde Road and Wrightstown Road are designated on the COT MS&R map provide a general note stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R). 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – The floor areas listed within the footprint of BLDG 3 does not match what is shown in Table 6.3-5 or Article 7. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Clarify what the wheel stops are for shown west of Bldg 2 and east of Bldg 3. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a wheel stop location dimension of detail 8 & 9, sheet C-3, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – For your information the wheel stops show for the 8 western most vehicle parking spaces are not required and could be eliminated. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Detail A sheet C-3 remove the reference to “CLASS II” as it is not applicable and should only reverence Short – Term. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate how the proposed Short – Term bicycle parking will meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e. Detail A sheet C-3 references “PROVIDE LIGHTING PER UDC (IF APPLY) and the requirement does apply. Cleary demonstrate how the short – term bicycle parking meets this requirement. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Provide a 4’ wide stripe pedestrian refuge area along the west side of Bldg 2 and east side of Bldg 3, see TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B.2. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/20/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Jaca Design Tue 4/20/2021 9:11 AM Returned for Corrections PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP21-0062 DESCRIPTION: SITE - Citywide Restoration, new private RV and new storage. 7821 E WRIGHTSTOWN RD FEES DUE: $ 1,206.50 Please pay the total fees (or at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees). A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENT https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees If amount isn't correct, check back in a few hours after data is updated. 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 4- Click Continue 5- Under the Pay column, check the boxes 6- Click Continue RESUBMITTAL - FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then the permit number) 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Title your 2nd submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter, 01.01.21 SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document Thank you. Sharon Beasley Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov (Disregard any automatic reply you might receive) |
| 04/20/2021 | SSHIELD1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved |