Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP21-0060
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/11/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/11/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 03/11/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 03/11/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 03/12/2021 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | 03/12/21 ADOT South Central District Office and Regional Traffic have reviewed the request and have no comments on this submittal. The development will have no impacts to ADOT facilities because of the location. Thank you Richard La Pierre Permits Supervisor, South Central District 1221 South Second Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85713 520.388.4234 (office) 520.307.5893 (cell) |
| 03/16/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package Comments: Sheet 1 1. Please refer to Pima Association of Governments (PAG) instead of Pima County/City of Tucson (PC/COT) standards. All sheets provide a basis of bearings and elevation according to Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06.4.8. 2. Project Number is DP21-0060. Add to all sheets. 3. Please call out min 3" = 1-mile scale on the location map. 4. PE stamp is somewhat illegible. Please provide a clearer one. 5. Please clearly delineate between current Lot 6 and Lot 7 boundaries as needed on all sheets. 6. Since the Wingate Wash is called out as the receiving waters on the SWPPP, please include the linework and callout on all location maps. Sheet 2 1. Per TSM 10-01.4.1. A All new sidewalks should have a 5' min width along local roads. Please revise 4' sidewalks in detail A and B accordingly. 2. Detail E shows the proposed sidewalk as below the edge of pavement. If this sidewalk is to remain in this state, it will require some barrier or separation in accordance with TSM 7-01.4.2A. 3. Per TSM 10-01.3.3. D.1 Sidewalks will be located a minimum of two feet from the back of the existing or projected wedge curb location (the standard location) and extend to the curb at all street intersections. Please revise detail CC as needed. Sheet 3 1. Please add the toe/top grading line to the cover sheet legend. 2. Please add the dog run fence to the cover sheet legend and label on the plan. 3. Please label channel names, all sheets. Sheet 5 1. Please indicate that the stabilized surface near Lot 41 will be in accordance with RWRD 111 as this will mandate the appropriate slopes within this grading area. Sheet 8 1. Geotechnical Report only suggests slopes as steep as 2:1. Please correct areas where 1:1 slopes are called out. Please update the geotechnical report to support the slope treatments for slopes steeper than 3:1. Sheet 11 1. Detail K - Freeboard is shown as 0.4' yet none of the channels show this value. Please make this call out generic Sheet 13 1. Detail T - Chapter 10 of the City of Tucson Drainage Design Manual limits the size of storm drainpipes to a minimum of 18" without approval from the COT Engineering Division. Please revise. Sheet 26 1. Please provide a north arrow, scale, and contour interval on this sheet. 2. The stabilized construction entrance should be placed at the entrance to Irvington Road due to the street widening occurring on Wingate. Drainage Comments: 1. Page 7 - Volume does not match 29000 shown on Tentative Plat. Please review and revise as necessary. 2. Page 8 - Average velocity in channel changes drastically at Station 5500-5700- Please review model for accuracy or explain the sudden change. 3. Page 13 - Please describe the section used for Max Capacity. 4. Appendix A - Please include an exhibit showing the soils type used in the hydrologic analysis. 5. Page 58 - Velocity for channel 4 used in riprap sizing does not match the velocity shown in the calculation for channel 4. Please revise and adjust rock sizing accordingly. 6. Page 68 - culvert calculation for OS2 shows a length of 9.8 feet, however, is measured at >70 on the figure. Please review and revise calculation as necessary. 7. Page 69 - culvert calculation for OS2 shows a length of 9.8 feet, however, is measured at >70 on the figure. Please review and revise calculation as necessary. 8. Page 75 - Please extend cross section 5700 to contain the flow. 9. Appendix E - Please provide stage storage discharge table and weir calculation/rating table. Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/17/2021 | JVINCEN1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/02/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | 04/02/21 No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 837-8040 |
| 04/07/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site drawing to indicate for which lots backwater valves will be required because the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is less than 12” below the proposed first floor elevations. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 04/08/2021 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | (The ATTACHED PDF mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.) 04/08/21 Bella Tierra, Tentative Plat, 1st submittal, DP21-0060 is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 04/12/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Development Services Department Zoning Review PROJECT: Bella Tierra Phase 3 Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0060 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 12, 2021 DUE DATE: April 09, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is March 10, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide an email address for the “DEVELOPER” of this project. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0060, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – General Note 3 add the following to the proposed use “SUBJECT TO UDC ARTICLE 8.7.3.” 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R).” 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – There is a 10’AC access ramp called out on sheets 3 & 8 that provides access to the park and dog run located in CA “B-2” provide the cross slopes for this ramp. Sheet 20 shows a “5’ Concrete Walk” located at the east end of this access ramp, show this walk on the site & grading plans and provide slope information so that accessibility requirements can be reviewed. There is also a double access gate system shown on the plan that provides access to the dog run, demonstrate that this gate system meets the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Chapter 4. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Steve Shields at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov. My email will return an automatic response stating that I have retired but I am currently working as a contract employee and will respond to your questions regarding this review. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/12/2021 | ALEXANDRA HINES | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide AVP in resubmittal. Or add general note that AVP will be submitted prior to building permit application. Submit AVP as a revision to DP21-0060. Alexandra Hines alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/12/2021 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | |
| 05/05/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | Email from: David Stiffey To: CDRC Wed 5/5/2021 1:14 PM RE: DP21-0060 As far as placement of sidewalk, ramps and scuppers and including various dimensions, they are all accurate on these plans. Nevertheless, regarding these items I did notice some things that were missing. 1. Regarding Sidewalk: PAG Standard 200 is referenced, but a "Detail" from the standard needs to be added to the plans. 2. Regarding Curb: PAG Standard 209 is referenced, but a "Detail" from the standard needs to be added to the plans. 3. Regarding Sidewalk Scuppers: PAG Standard 205 is referenced, but a "Detail" from the standard needs to be added to the plans. 4. Regarding Wheelchair Ramps: NEW Wheelchair Ramps are drawn on the plans, but there isn’t any information regarding them. The PAG Standard 207 needs to be added to the plans, or and ADA approved revision if the new ramps vary from the standard. David Stiffey, Program Coordinator City of Tucson Transportation and Mobility |
| 05/12/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Ordinance Review Section PROJECT: DP21-0060 Address: 4855 S Wingate Bl, Bella Terrace Phase 3 Zoning: R-2, R-3 Existing Use: Undisturbed Sonoran Desert Proposed Use: Single family residential TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 12, 2021 DUE DATE: April 9, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape/NPPO Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11, City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) Article 7.7 Native Plant Preservation, 7.6 Landscaping and Screening, and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). 1. Label the 30% set-aside area as NUOS (Natural Undisturbed Open Space) for consistency with the Unified Development Code (UDC). Ensure that a line weight for this area is the most prominent. 2. Please identify the rectangle enclosed by “Grade Limit” on the south side of the property below lots 78-74. 3. Identify in notes or on a legend what “BEHS” is. 4. Remove General Note #7, NPPO Note #2, #4, and #6. Modify Notes #1 and #7 for consistency. Modify Note #10 to use the UDC rather than the LUC code. 5. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 6. Change General Note #4 to PDSD rather than Planning Department. Remove note #7. 7. The Landscape Notes on L-2 are partially cut off. 8. Provide construction details for the ramada, site furniture, jogging path, d.g. installation, chain link fence & gate, dog waste station, and concrete edge. 9. Provide plant and irrigation maintenance schedule in accordance with UDC Section 7.6.8. If you have any questions, please contact me at anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4969. |
| 05/12/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | EMail sent from: COTDSDPermits To: C Thompson Wed 5/12/2021 4:57 PM Returned for Corrections Notice PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP21-0060 DESCRIPTION: Tentative Plat/FLD - Bella Tierra, Phase 3. 4855 S WINGATE BL FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. INCLUDE IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your 2nd submittal documents according to this example: 2_Comment Response Letter, 01.01.21 FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then the permit number) SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on “View” Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email for Development Pkgs: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov Email for Building Permits: PDSDinquiries@TucsonAz.gov |
| 05/12/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Email sent from: TEPDEVREV@tep.com To: CDRC Wed 5/12/2021 9:19 AM Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed and approves the Tentative plat for Bella Tierra subdivision. Costs for removal or relocation of existing TEP facilities will be billable to the developer. If there are any questions, please contact Courtney Tejeda at TEPDEVREV@tep.com. |