Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0047
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/22/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/02/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Plan Comments: Sheet 1 1. AM 2-06.3.10 Please add a legend. 2. The location map needs more detail. Please revise per AM 2-06.4.7 including an appropriate scale called out (min 1" = 3 miles) and the brief legal description. 3. New reference number is DP21-0047. Please add to the lower right quadrant of all sheets. Sheet 2 1. Please include contour interval on all applicable sheets 2. Please indicate nearest utilities. Label utility linework and make the line type have a larger scale for readability. 3. AM 2-06.3 Please add the existing contours that are missing from the area south of site. 4. Provide adjacent properties parcel numbers on all sheets 5. Please change notes an all sheets from "(E)" to "(EX)" to match the abbreviations listed on Sheet 1. 6. Please delineate individual building boundaries. Sheet 3 1. "1060" call out in northern wash should be changed to a call out for the proposed wash centerline. Add another note if necessary. 2. Please show a greater extent of the 1026 outline of the riparian area in the northwest of the site. 3. In the notes, indicate the width of both the existing and proposed erosion hazard setbacks. 4. Please provide existing/proposed contour labels. 5. Notes regarding existing site features should indicate " to be removed" or "to remain". 6. Ensure all text is within viewport boundary and fully visible. 7. For the eastern connection to the existing basin, call out "see grading plan for tie into existing basin" and add greater detail (remove riprap, etc.). Drainage Report Comments: 1. Section 1.2 - Please include all parcel numbers for project improvements. 2. Section 1.4 - Please provide soil hydrologic group on an included figure or an independent figure in the appendix. 3. Section 1.4 - Please provide a certification that onsite topography has not changed since 2015. 4. Section 1.4 - Please provide excerpts from reports/plans used for offsite watershed discharges in an appendix. Please also provide a statement verifying the analysis. 5. Section 1.4 - Please describe if the project is located in a critical or balance basin with regards to detention/retention requirements. 6. Section 3.1 - Basin B & C volumes provided and required does not match volumes shown on Figure 3. Please review and revise as necessary. 7. Section 3.0 - Please describe in more detail the expansion of Existing Basin B and removal of the berm. Include the bottom elevation, water surface elevations, outlet description, freeboard and side slopes. 8. Section 4.2.2 - Please provide a summary table showing the water surface elevations have not changed more than 0.10 ft. 9. Section 5.5 - Please provide basin maintenance requirements and responsible party. 10. Figure 2 - Please provide HEC-RAS cross sections on map. 11. Figure 2 - Please provide contour elevations on map. 12. Figure 2 - Please provide a channel that is not in a perched condition or provide stabilization to ensure failure does not occur up to and including the freeboard elevation. 13. Figure 2 - Please identify curb openings per report table. 14. Figure 2 - Please provide channel slope. 15. Appendix - Please include all grading and drainage plan sheets or call out hydraulic structure sizing on Figure 2. 16. Appendix E3 - Assuming cross section 27 is at the basin outfall weir, it does not show containment across the 100-ft. Please review and revise as necessary. 17. Appendix E.3 - RAS Cross Section not contained. Please expand cross section and revise floodplain. 18. Appendix E.3 - RAS Cross Section not contained. Please expand cross section and revise floodplain. Grading Plans: Sheet 2 1. Please include contour interval in the north arrow block. 2. Identify light posts, existing EHS, existing 100-YR floodplains. 3. Please note the side slope ratio for all basins and washes. 4. Provide detail of spillway and section in fill conditions including the top width of the berm. 5. Provide substantial slopes for the interior of the parking expansion. 6. Identify the linework that is shaded and dashed which roughly matches the proposed parking lines. 7. Provide spot grades a maximum of 100' apart along entities (i.e. flowlines) per AM 2-06.4.9.E.1. 8. Dimension all existing and proposed Erosion Hazard Setbacks. 9. Keynote 25 is called out but not listed in the construction notes. Please revise. 10. Revise Keynote 11 to exclude reference to employee parking locations not referenced. 11. Please reference the appropriate PAG details instead of C.O.T./Pima Standard Details on all sheets. Sheet 3 1. Include Drainage Notes according to AM 2-06.4.7. 2. Correct Detail 2 Section B-B from asphalt pavement to concrete section. 3. Please add the following general note "All construction and test methods shall conform to the Pima Association of Governments (PAG) Standard Specifications for Public Improvements, 2015 Edition, or latest, except as modified herein." SWPPP: Sheet 1 1. General Notes should include the procedure for any spills that occur. 2. Change SWMP references to SWPPP. 3. Please update this plan set with the site plan components listed in the ADEQ 2020 Construction General Permit SWPPP Checklist including, but not limited to, flow quantities and directions, permanent and temporary control measures, and applicable slope erosion protection and detail. Sheet 2 1. Sediment control should be called out at all basin inlets and outlets as well as tops and toes. 2. Sediment control should be placed between the concrete washout area and the northwest basin in order to prevent conveyance of contaminants. 3. Extend limits of disturbance to include the southern portion being reconfigured, parking stalls and lanes. Because the limits of disturbance will need to be moved, please move the construction entrance to the middle of the parking lane. Review and Comments provided by third party engineer reviewers under contract with the City of Tucson. For Questions or Concerns contact: Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/11/2021 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/23/2021 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will may be needed and should contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Add case number DP21-046 on each sheet. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply |
| 03/25/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/30/2021 | AWARNER1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Anne Warner, RLA Planner PROJECT: HomeGoods Parking Addition Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0047 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 30, 2021 DUE DATE: February 22, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 22 , 2022. 1. 2-06.3.4 - Please add the title of the project name to the legal description and case numbers. 2. 2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. Please remove the City of Tucson Development Package box, as staff now digitally stamps all plans for approvals. 3. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. The Pima County Assessor’s parcel number should be in 140-41-034D format, please revise all occurrences. 4. 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). Please include S1-3 in this format, and renumber the landscape/irrigation/NPPO plans to reflect the total number of pages. 5. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, DS, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. Please add this information to all landscape/irrigation/NPPO plans. Replace the “Prepared for …” with the Project Name and address on the landscape and irrigation sheets. 6. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three-inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. Provide a location map to scale (NTS is not acceptable). 7. 2-06.4.4.C – Label the sections or section corners, township, and range. 8. 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. Clearly differentiate between existing and proposed uses. 9. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. Clearly differentiate between existing and proposed uses, especially on sheet SP2. The limits of construction and the accessible path of travel use the same line type, please make them different. Identify the line through the middle of the drawing. The existing warehouses are missing, please show. 10. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. Add previous applications (DP & DS) to the general notes and provide the type of application processed, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 11. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Add percentage of vehicular use area expansion relative to existing site. Label “Building Data” as Existing Building Data. Label the second “Building Data” as Existing Parking Requirements and separate required parking from trailer storage parking. Indicate existing and proposed number of trailer storage parking, label accordingly. Remove extra “Short-term Bicycle Parking Required”. Add Bicycle to “*Long-term Parking Required”. 12. 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed, but please make a distinction between the two, written and graphically. 13. 2-06.4.8.C – Add the following information regarding existing public rights-of-way for Palo Verde Road and Medina Road; right-of-way width (there is a graphic conflict for Medina Road on SP-2, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 14. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The 40’ Exception of Lot 6 at the upper right corner of sheet SP-3 is unclear as to its location. The 10’ Utility information along the right side of the page on SP-3 is cut off. 15. 2-06.4.9.T – Show existing refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. Additional Comments – On sheet SP2, the south property border, the zone is I-1. On Sheet SP3 and SP2, all of the riprap graphics looks the same; which is existing and proposed? Consider renaming the project to clarify that the purpose of the expansion is to accommodate additional trailer storage/parking. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Anne Warner at (520) 837-4969 or by email anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/30/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: March 30, 2021 Returned for Corrections PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP21-0047 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/Swppp - Homegoods, parking addition for commercial storage. 6803 S PALO VERDE RD FEES DUE: $ 7,952.91 Please pay the total fees (or at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees). A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENT https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees If information is not available or amount isn't correct, check back in a few hours after data is updated. (Visa, MC, Discover, American Express, or pay from bank account) 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 4- Click the blue tab: Continue 5- Under the Pay column, check the boxes 6- Click Continue RESUBMITTAL Submit the following documents to: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then the permit number) 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Title the documents for your 2nd submittal starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document For all NEW development package submittals on the Filedrop page, select the box: "SITE REVIEW...". Thank you. City of Tucson Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |