Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0041
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/15/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/05/2021 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP21-0041 1) Sheet 1. Zoning and Land Use Notes. #4 appears to be for a different project. Utilities note #1 appears to be for a difference project 2) Provide approval from environmental services for service pick up off of the alley 3) There are several drainage elements/features in the original grading plan which has expired, which appear to have never been built or maintained. The propose shows the elimination of the southernmost retention basin. This will need to be either re-established. Constructed to take into account the design of the original basin or replaced elsewhere on site. The reference drainage report/statement could not be found. Provide on next submittal 4) Per Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual section 3.4.2 provide a grade control marker for each of the proposed detention basins. On the plans please also provide the coordinates of the grade control markers so that they can be easily located in the future 5) Sheet 5. Provide construction/cross section details for Basin 2B and the associated perforated PVC pipe. It is not clear how this is constructed John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/16/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/16/2021 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | (The ATTACHED PDF mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.) 03/16/21 Pima Sober Living, DP21-0041 , 1st submittal review, is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 03/17/2021 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will may be needed and should contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Add case number DP21-041 on each sheet. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply |
| 03/18/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/22/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Development Services Department Zoning Review PROJECT: Pima Sober Living Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0041 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 22, 2021 DUE DATE: March 16, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is February 14, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0041, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Under Zoning and Land Use Note 3 you list the use as “MEDICAL (EXTENDED HEALTH CARE) SUBJECT TO 4.9.13.O (OUTDOOR ACTIVITY MAY OCCUR PER 2c) and then under this note you list the use as “Residential Care Service: Physical and Behavioral Health use (Specialized Treatment Home) per Russlyn Wells Determination, which use are you proposing? Until the proposed use is clarified required calculation such as vehicle, bicycle, loading, etc. cannot be verified. Zoning will review this as a “Residential Care Services, Adult Care or Physical and Behavioral Health Services: Unlimited # of Residents” subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.J.3.d, .4, .6, & .8 and 4.9.13.O. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Remove Zoning and Land Use Note 4 from the plan as it is not applicable. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – As this site is subject to Use Specific Standard 4.9.7.J.8, “The maximum permitted lot coverage is 60%. Provide a lot coverage calculation on the plan that meets the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.3. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E – As this site is made up of seven (7) parcels, 133-15-305A, 133-15-305D, 133-15-305E, 133-15-305F, 133-15-305G, 133-15-305H, & 133-15-305J, a lot combination will be required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request with your next submittal. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until the proposed use is clarified Zoning cannot verify required vehicle parking. As Zoning stated in comment 2 this project has been reviewed as a Residential Care Services, Adult Care or Physical and Behavioral Health Services: Unlimited # of Residents”, that said unless the proposed “ADMINISTRATION OFFICE AN COMMUNITY BUILDING” is a separate use from the residential care service it would not be parked separate from the care use. Remove the 1:300 requirements and provide a vehicle parking space calculation based on UDC Table TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, Residential Care Services: 21 or more Residents, only. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation shall also include the number of required & provided accessible parking space, including Van accessible spaces. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Short-term bicycle detail 3 sheet 3, it is not clear how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.a, .b. & .c are met. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Sheet 1 & 3 the long-term bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Residential Care Services, 0.10 spaces per bedroom. Minimum requirement is 2 spaces, not “1.15” or 0.15” as shown on the plan. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter setback listed on sheet 1 is not correct and should be 20’-0” or 1-1/2 the height of the proposed exterior wall measured to the street property line. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The street perimeter yard setback shown on sheet 3 is not shown correctly and should be measured from the street property line. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height of all buildings within the footprint for all buildings shown on the plan. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provide a general note stating “ALL SIGNAGE REQUIRES SEPARTE PERMIT”. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin, Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/22/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: March 22, 2021 Returned for Corrections PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP21-0041 DESCRIPTION: Site - Pima Sober Living, residential healthcare. 2200 N CAMINO PRINCIPAL FEES DUE: $ 1,190.00 Please pay the total fees (or at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees). A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENT https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees If information is not available or amount isn't correct, check back in a few hours after data is updated. (Visa, MC, Discover, American Express, or pay from bank account) 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 4- Click the blue tab: Continue 5- Under the Pay column, check the boxes 6- Click Continue RESUBMITTAL Submit the following documents to: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then the permit number) 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Title the documents for your 2nd submittal starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document For all NEW development package submittals on the Filedrop page, select the box: "SITE REVIEW...". Thank you. City of Tucson Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov (Disregard the automatic reply you will receive: "This email account is not...") |