Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0038
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/15/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/16/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REVIEW | Approved | 02/16/21 Transit Services has no comment on DP21-0038. Thank you, Christopher Blue Transit Services Coordinator | Transit Services Division Department of Transportation & Mobility C: 520.260.9558 |
| 03/16/2021 | AWARNER1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, RLA PROJECT: Glenn & Balboa Housing Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0038 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 16, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is February 15, 2022. 1. 2-06.3.8 - The contour interval as applicable to each sheet (Grading Plan) should be placed in the upper right corner of each sheet. 2. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any, prior to final Development Package approval. 3. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage; 2-06.4.7.A.8.c. Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion (lot coverage calculation). 4. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. |
| 03/16/2021 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will may be needed and should contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Add case number DP21-038 on each sheet. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply |
| 03/16/2021 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | (The ATTACHED PDF mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.) 03/15/21 Glenn & Balboa Housing, DP21-0038, 1st submittal, is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 03/16/2021 | JPEELDA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 03/16/2021 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP21-0038 1) Provide a landing at the end of the pedestrian circulation path to the proposed trash enclosure 2) Show on plan that curb access ramp at the corner of Glenn and Balboa will be upgrade to PAG detail 207 3) Show on plans a new 5' wide sidewalk along Balboa per PAG detail 201 4) Sheet 3 for the pedestrian path connection Glenn, show a 5' wide landing at the top of the ramp where the pathway turns to the west and down 5) Provide a pedestrian circulation connection to Balboa 6) Per (TSM) section 10-01.3.2.C. At the intersections of streets with other streets or collector or arterial streets with PAALs/Driveways, the curb lines will be connected with a curve having the minimum radius shown in Figure 6, measured at the face of the curb. Update the driveway entrances on to Glenn to show curb returns 7) Provide approval from the department of transportation for the use 2' of right-of way for the landscape buffer 8) Drainage Report. Add DP21-0038 to the cover sheet 9) Drainage Report. Figure 4, show discharge (CFS) at each of the scuppers onto Glenn St 10) Drainage Report. For the southern channel discharge into Balboa, a sidewalk scupper will be needed for the required sidewalk in the right of way. Update drainage report to show appropriately sized scupper 11) For the water harvesting basin in the northwest corner of the site, confirm if a discharge point is needed and provide a scupper as needed John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/17/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit. |
| 03/31/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | March 31, 2021 Returned for Corrections PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP21-0038 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading - Glenn and Balboa Housing. 263 W GLENN ST FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. RESUBMITTAL Submit the following documents to: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then the permit number) 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Title the documents for your 2nd submittal starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document For all NEW development package submittals on the Filedrop page, select the box: "SITE REVIEW...". City of Tucson Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov (Disregard the automatic reply you will receive: "This email account is not...") |
| 03/31/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | 03/31/21 Proposed: 1. The removal and reconstruction of driveway aprons all looks GOOD and correct according to the PAG standards. 2. Scuppers likewise look GOOD and are correct according to the standards. Not proposed: "New Sidewalk" along the entire length of street frontage. This is required per the Development Standards: 3-01.3.3, whenever a new development is built. This would also require that new sidewalk also be a minimum of 5 Ft. wide. Thus, if their sidewalk requirement is 5’ wide, that would also change the proposal of their new driveway aprons. They are intending on replacing the existing driveways with new and 4’ wide sidewalk because that is the width of the existing sidewalk. Have to add new 5’ wide sidewalk adjacent to street frotage, and also modify design for the driveway aprons to reflect 5’ wide sidewalk as well. David Stiffey Transportation and Mobility Program Coordinator email: David.Stiffey@TucsonAz.gov |