Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0029
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/02/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/03/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 02/03/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 02/03/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 02/08/2021 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | 02/08/21 ADOT South Central District Office and ADOT Southern Regional Traffic have reviewed the request and have no comments on this development at this time. The development will have no direct impacts to ADOT facilities, however due to the location of the project ADOT wants to make sure the developer is aware of ADOT’s future improvements along the I-10 corridor. This can be found at the following link below. https://azdot.gov/node/14424 Richard La Pierre Permits Supervisor, South Central District 1221 South Second Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85713, 520.388.4234 (office) |
| 02/15/2021 | SBEASLE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | (The TEP FACILITIES MAP and TEP REDLINE MAP can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.) WO#6340233 February 11, 2021 SUBJECT: Raising Cane's Restaurant #598 I-10 & E Ajo Way DP21-0029 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted January 7 2020. There do not appear to be any conflicts. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Bianca Maubach New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (OH 204) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-307-3864 Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area Designer Martin Rodriguez, at (520) 991-5495 Sincerely, Conor Mahoney, Office Support Assistant Design/Build |
| 03/02/2021 | MROSS2 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Indicate fire hydrant location and distance from building on plan. Fire hydrant is required to be within 400' of all exterior portions of the building. If building is equiped with an automatic sprinkler system the distance to hydrant can be increased to 600'. Page C 3.0 note 8 indicates that building will be sprinklered. Indicate on plan location of underground fire line or remove note. Fire sprinkler plans are a defered submital through the fire departmnet. Michael Ross 520-837-7082 Michael.Ross2@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/03/2021 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will may be needed and should contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Add case number DP21-0029 on each sheet. Proposed rezoning has not been completed. Landscape section cannot approve plans until Re-zoning has been effectuated. If applicable indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply |
| 03/03/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | 03/03/21 No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation (520) 837-8040 |
| 03/04/2021 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Reqs Change | March 3, 2021 RE: DP21-0029 / Site/Grading/Swppp - Raising Cane's restaurant, 1st submittal review, Received February 2, 2021 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP21-0029, Site/Grading/Swppp - Raising Cane's restaurant; 1st Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 1.47 acre site, located southeast of the intersection of East Ajo Way and South Kino Parkway and is west of the Kino Sports Complex. The property is currently zoned Residence Zone 1 (R-1) but was rezoned during C9-20-07 to Commercial Zone 2 (C-2) to support the future development of a mixture of commercial and retail uses. The proposed project is to establish a new food service use. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following conditions of approval, as noted below. These conditions shall be identified in the general notes section of the revised development plan and are conditions of rezoning associated with C9-20-07. Conditions of approval: 1. "According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Notice Criteria Tool, this project area is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. As the project site develops every project applicant shall file FAA Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin for every proposed project unless FAA staff, with the Obstruction Evaluation / Airport Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA), provides the project applicant with written communication that filing FAA Form 7460 is not required. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp" 2. "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit and before any proposed subdivision of the property, the property owner/developer/applicant shall record the TAA approved Avigation Easement form which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided. The current property owner/developer/applicant or other person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded send a complete copy of the recorded easement document, which contains all pages which were recorded, to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Senior Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756" Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M., Senior Airport Planner |
| 03/04/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | March 4, 2021 DP21-0029, Raising Caines The plan requires the following changes: The driveway requires updated improvements to the pedestrian ramps. Show improvements in the right of way with current PAG standards. Refer to pag standard details for type of ramps. Adjust driveway and island to aling with interior roadway. The proposed configuration has a inbound deflection path that may cause vehicular conflicts. Show existing infrastructure in the right of way to determine if any imprivements or modifications are required. Zelin Canchola, Transportation and Mobility Engineering |
| 03/04/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Development Services Department Zoning Review PROJECT: Raising Cane’s – 1-10 & E Ajo Way Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0029 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 4, 2021 DUE DATE: March 3, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is February 01, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.4.1 – Provide the email address for the Architect listed on the cover sheet. 2. 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on all pages of the DP. 3. 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0029, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. 2-06.4.7.A.3 – Revise Zoning and Land Use Note 1 to include “PROPOSED ZONING C-2” and place rezoning case number “C9-20-07” adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide the rezoning conditions on the plan. 5. 2-06.4.7.A.3 – Sheet C2.0 General Note 1 references the “EXISTING ZONING IS R-1, R-2 PER C9-20-07”, this is not correct. 6. 2-06.4.7.A.7 - Provide case number S20-031 adjacent to the title block on all sheets. Until S20-031 is approved this DP cannot be approved. 7. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – There appears that there is an outdoor patio proposed but it is not clearly marked. Clarify is a patio is proposed and if this is the case include the gross floor area in the vehicle parking space calculation. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 8. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 9. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. 10. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 11. 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said as the parcel to the west is part of Phase II demonstrate how vehicles will be prevented from access the parcel to the west through PAAL shown at the southwest corner of this site. 12. 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.a.2 show the required 1’-0” setback on the plan. 13. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – On the “ACCESSIBLE AND STANDARD PARKING DETAIL” fully dimension a standard vehicle parking space. 14. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - On the “ACCESSIBLE AND STANDARD PARKING DETAIL” the 7’-0” height should be to the bottom of the “VAN ACCESSIBLE” sign. 15. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – On the “ACCESSIBLE AND STANDARD PARKING DETAIL” it appears that the proposed accessible parking sign encroaches into the required 2’-6” vehicle overhang. Clearly demonstrate that the 2’-6” overhang is maintained. 16. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – On the “PRECAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOP” detail Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3 the dimension from the front of the vehicle parking space to the back of the wheel stop should be 2’-6”. 17. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The accessible vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Per 2018 IBC Chapter 11, Table 1106.1 the requirement is based on the number of parking spaces provided, 54 spaces require 3 accessible spaces. 18. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – As your plan shows vehicles being allowed to overhang sidewalks and location where vehicles could overhang a sidewalk less than 6’-6” in width wheel stops are required. 19. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The “SHORT-TERM PROVIDED 1 SPACE” is not correct. Per UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.d A single rack is designed and located to accommodate two bicycles therefore the number provided should be 4. 20. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Cleary show the proposed location of the long-term bicycle parking on the plan. 21. 2-06.4.9.R – Provide width dimensions for all sidewalks. 22. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 23. 2-06.4.9.W – Provide a general note stating “ALL SIGNS REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMITS”. 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin, Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/05/2021 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP21-0029 1) Provide a trash enclosure that meets the requirements of TSM section 8, figure 3A 2) Provide positive drainage away from the trash enclosure per TSM section 8. Sheet 11 shows negative drainage to an opening crossing the pedestrian circulation path to the south. Update as needed 3) The alignment of the pedestrian connection to E Ajo Way differs from that shown in DP20-0189. Update as needed 4) Provide a minimum 4' pedestrian circulation path on site. Include a 2.5' wide vehicle overhang. Provide wheel stops as needed 5) Sheet 3. Show vehicle stacking to ensure that the pedestrian path crossing the drive thru is not impeded. Reference UDC section 7.4.7 6) Show the pedestrian circulation path just to the north of the western portion of the drive lane is physically separated from the drive thru lane 7) Ensure that roof drains, from the new building, scupper underneath sidewalks as needed. Reference COT Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 7-01.4.1.e. Show on plans location of roof drains and scuppers 8) Sheet 11. Grading note 3 3. Update to show propose volume of water harvesting area. Provide spot grades as needed within the basin boundary 9) Eastern and western north-south running landscaped areas. Provide spot grades for water harvesting areas. 10) Sheet 9, ADA Parking sign detail. Show that minimum clearance from lowest sign to grade is 7'. Removed reference to 60" clearance. Update sign detail to reference Tucson standards 11) Sheet 24. Water harvesting plan. Confirm that proposed basins are providing the recommended volume. Volume to take into account side slopes/constructed condition of basin and any cover that is used 12) Sheet 25. Adjust planting plan adjacent to the trash enclosure to provide minimum vertical clearance for service vehicles 13) Sheet 4. Confirm that the proposed disturbance limits for the project match those shown in DP20-0189, in particular the inlet to the landscaped area to east and the construction of that area. Update as needed This project will require a pre-construction meeting prior to issuance of the development package permit. Project will require EOR certification prior to final inspection 14) This project proposes a disturbance of more than 1 acre or part of a project which will ultimately disturb greater than 1 acre and/or requires a storm water pollution prevention plan John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/08/2021 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Completed | |
| 03/09/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 03/09/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | REVIEW | Approved | 03/08/21 The Transit Services Division and Sun Tran have reviewed the request and have no further comments. Our previous comments to move the bus shelter and pad over 20’, and then also extend the pad by 20’ have been incorporated by Blake Junak of Cypress Civil Development. Thank you, Christopher Blue Transit Services Coordinator | Transit Services Division Department of Transportation & Mobility |
| 03/10/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: March 10, 2021 Returned for Corrections PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP21-0029 DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/Swppp - Raising Cane's restaurant, 2100 E AJO WY FEES DUE: $ 4,028.86 Please pay the total fees (or at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees). A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENT https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees If information is not available or amount isn't correct, check back in a few hours after data is updated. (Visa, MC, Discover, American Express, or pay from bank account) 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 4- Click the blue tab: Continue 5- Under the Pay column, check the boxes 6- Click Continue RESUBMITTAL Submit the following documents to: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then the permit number) 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Title the documents for your 2nd submittal starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document For all NEW development package submittals on the Filedrop page, select the box: "SITE REVIEW...". Thank you. City of Tucson Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |