Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP21-0021
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/28/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/23/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Development Services Department Zoning Review PROJECT: Taco Bell – 1818 E Speedway – New Building Development Package (2nd Review) DP21-0021 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 23, 2021 DUE DATE: August 25, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is February 01, 2022. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 1. The provided form was not signed by the Assessor’s Office. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E – As this site is comprised of four (4) parcels a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approve Pima County Combo Request form with the next submittal. 2. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. Provide the zoning for the parcels north of Speedway and east of Campbell. 3. This comment was not addressed no dimension provided. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The PAAL shown along the east side of the building does not meet the minimum 24’ width as required by UDC Article 7.4.6.D, Figure 7.4.6-A and TABLE 7.4.6-1: MOTOR VEHICLE USE AREA DIMENSIONS. 4. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a width dimension for the access lane that provides access to the abandoned alley. 5. The 15.3’ dimension does not meet the minimum 15.5” requirement. .COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a parking space depth dimension for the parking spaces shown along the east side of the site. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Keynote 6 sheet 3 calls out the short term bicycle detail on sheet 5 but the detail is on sheet 6. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The short-term bicycle parking space detail does not address UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e., 7.4.9.B.2.a, .f 8. Zoning acknowledges that a DDO was approved. Provide the T21SA00207 case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note stating the case number, date of approval, and what was modified. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide a perimeter yard setback dimension from the proposed building to the south property line. Per UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE C-1, C-2, C-3, OCR-1, & OCR-2 ZONES, C-1 ZONE, NONRESIDENTIAL USE TO A RESIDENTIAL ZONE The required perimeter yard setback from the proposed building to the R-3 zoned property is 1 ½ times the height of the proposed exterior building wall. It appears that a Design Development Option will be required. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/23/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the rim elevation of the upstream manhole, 8041-01. [Initial comment: Provide the location and size of sanitary sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018.] |
| 08/27/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/31/2021 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Email from: David Stiffey To: CDRC Tue 8/31/2021 2:16 PM Approved. No comments. David Stiffey City of Tucson |
| 09/09/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. See previous comment 8 - Provide spot grades in all depressed landscaped areas. Spot grades to consider the depth of ground cover proposed. I don't see any spot grades in any of the landscaped areas and I also don't see keynote 7 used in the site/grading plan. 2. See previous comment 9b - Show the outlet points for drainage along the drive thru lane in this general location. The grades and slopes indicate outlet points that aren't shown. I don't see key note 10 used anywhere on the site/grading plan. Revise and clarify as needed. 3. The accessible route out to the trash enclosure shows it dropping off the vertical curb into the PAAL. Revise to show an accessible curb ramp or reroute the accessible route path. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/09/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Erin Harris Thu 9/9/2021 4:21 PM Returned for Corrections: DP21-0021 DESCRIPTION: SITE - Taco Bell, modifications to building, drive-thru and trash enclosure. 1818 E SPEEDWAY BL Fee Balance: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab and you will see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW INCLUDE IN RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your 3rd submittal documents according to this example: 3_Comment Response Letter, 09.01.21 FILEDROP for Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email for Development Pkgs: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) |