Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP21-0014
Parcel: 136301380

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Permit Number - DP21-0014
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/09/2021 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
03/09/2021 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL

4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data

All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

The Development Package will may be needed and should contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Add case number DP21-00014 on each sheet.

Verify the following has been met:

8.7.3. FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD)

Landscaping, Screening and Wall Requirements

1. FLD projects shall comply with Section 7.6, Landscaping and Screening Standards, except as otherwise provided by this section.



Landscape plans shall incorporate water-conserving design as defined in Section 7.6.6, Use of Water, and as described in the Technical Standards Manual.



Water harvesting techniques shall be incorporated as part of the landscape design based on the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual prepared for the City of Tucson Transportation Department Stormwater Section.



Mechanical equipment, utility boxes, irrigation equipment and similar elements shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the FLD.

6. If a perimeter wall is proposed along an existing public right-of-way, it shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. The wall shall incorporate one or more of the following decorative materials:

a. Tile;

b. Stone;

c. Brick;

d. Adobe;

e. A textured material such as stucco or plaster; or,

f. Metal.

If necessary Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning.

Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval.

Additional comments may apply
03/09/2021 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed
03/09/2021 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: Development Services Department Zoning Review

PROJECT: Bella Tierra Phase 2
Development Package (1st Review)
DP21-0014

TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 19, 2021

DUE DATE: February 22, 2021

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is January 21, 2022.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0014, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Revise General Note 3 to read “PROPOSED USE SINGLE-FAMILY, DETACHED SUBJECT TO UDC ARITCLE 8.7.3.”

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Revise the “PERIMETER YARDS: R-1” to include “ALONG FLD PROJECT SITE BOUNDARIES”. Also add “PERIMETER YARD ON INTERIOR LOTS AS PERMITED BY ADOPTED BUILDING CODES”

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS)

2-06.5.3 Additional Information
The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable:

4. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.D – Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.E – An Architectural Variation Plan meeting the requirements of UDC Article 8.7.3.M is required to be approved prior to issuance of any building permits. Zoning acknowledges FLD SUBDIVSION NOTE 4.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.5.3.G.1 – Architectural Variation Plan

7. 2-06.5.3.G.2 - If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin, (520) 837-4966 or Elisa.Hamblin @tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
03/09/2021 SBEASLE1 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change (The ATTACHED PDF mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.)

02/22/21 Bella Tierra, DP21-0014 - 1st submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.
The attached pdf contains addressing’s comments.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Robin Freiman, Addressing Official

Pima County Development Services Department
(520) 724-7570
03/09/2021 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed
03/09/2021 SBLOOD1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change Sheet 1
1. Provide related case numbers on each sheet.
2. Project reference number is DP21-0014. Add to all sheets.
3. Add phase lines along Phase 1B and 2 and add to legend.
4. Indicate COT field book number and datum for basis of bearing.
5. Include all applicable UDC sections associated with the proposed use in General Note 3, "as permitted in the R-1 zone, subject to use-specific standards per UDC 4.8.4 and 4.9.7.B".
6. Indicate scale and add north arrow to the cover sheet location map (DP and GP).
7. Proposed vehicle plus visitor parking does not equal total proposed. Please revise and update accordingly.
Sheet 3
8. Add existing utility sizes near points of connection.
9. Add contour interval to north arrow and scale blocks on all sheets.
10. Indicate drainage pattern for the area between Lots 32 and 33.
Sheet 4
11. Add existing SVTs along Linderbrook Drive to all DP sheets.
12. Provide mid-block ramps at all T-intersections as needed to provide adequate pedestrian access.
Sheet 5
13. Provide dedication or documentation information which ensures legal use of the portion of Linderbrook Drive constructed outside site limits.
14. Add callout for removal of bollards on Linderbrook Drive.
15. Please add keynote 5 callout to Lot 10/11 fire hydrant.
16. Include 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevations for northeast basin.
Sheet 7
17. Clearly demonstrate in the grading plans and landscape plans that water harvesting is maximized.
Sheet 8
18. Check sheet matchlines on sheet 8 and 9.
19. Geotechnical Report should be updated to include allowance for 1:1 slope treatment per Detail F/11. Currently states "All slopes should be designed at a 2:1... or flatter".
Sheet 10
20. Please provide sloped bottom to provide positive drainage in northeast basin. Adjust floor elevation on this sheet and on weir detail on sheet 12.
21. Provide spot elevations on eastern end of basin to demonstrate adequate freeboard above WSEL 57.3.
22. Provide notarized permission and recorded easement for off-site drainage solution.
Sheet 11
23. Include the slope and required treatment above the top of channel in Detail I.
Sheet 12
24. Detail M only applies to the northeast end of the pipe in Detail L. Please remove callout from the southwest end.
25. Add more detail to Detail P. Concrete thickness, saw cut, tie into existing, etc.
26. Please provide structural detail as part of the weir design.
27. Please provide top of basin, freeboard elevation, top of concrete structure elevation, and adjust basin bottom (if revised per sheet 10 comments) in Detail L profile view.
Sheet 13
28. Add dimension between the center of the post barricade and roadway width on Detail Q.
Drainage Report
29. Add phone number for owner on cover.
30. Fill out plan number on cover.
31. Section 1.4 - Please be more specific how the approved grading and drainage plans were utilized for offsite channel analysis.
32. Section 1.5 - Please add additional section and mention the need for any permits such as 404, FUP, NPDES, etc.
33. Section 1.5 - Please describe who is responsible for the sedimentation and vegetation in the existing channel and how the problem will be changed or if it will continue to be an issue post development. Please describe the consequences should maintenance not be regularly performed.
34. Section 2.1 - Text describes 9 watersheds but table has 10. Please revise to include discussion of all watersheds summarized.
35. Section 2.2 - Please explain why the average cfs/acre for offsite conditions is lower on average than even though it is primarily developed as compared to existing conditions onsite peak discharges.
36. Section 2.3 - Please include a discussion of HEC-HMS modeling.
37. Section 2.3 - Please include other parameters in hydrology summary table including length, slope, soil type, imperviousness, basin factor, time of concentration, etc.
38. Section 3.1 - Please include freeboard requirement and freeboard provided in summary table.
39. Section 3.1 - Please include weir equation used and calculation sheet in the appendix.
40. Section 4.2 - Please explain the max channel depth sudden change at section 210 to 0.6 ft.
41. Section 4.2 - Please provide a description of the Manning's value used.
42. Section 4.2 - States the unmaintained channel has capacity but then states there is breakout. Please verify which statement is correct.
43. Section 5.1 - Please explain if scupper is on grade or in sag, also please explain which equation from the city manual is used - it is not clear from the spreadsheet if the orifice or weir equation is ultimately what was used.
44. Section 5.2 - Please include catch basin calculation in the appendix. There appears to be only scupper calculations.
45. Section 5.3 - Please expand upon the use of grouted riprap channels and include a detail in the drainage report.
46. Section 5.6 - Please clarify the type of curb used, typical section of roadway, slope used for capacity, gutter if used, etc. Please also include the maximum allowable street flow.
47. Appendix A - Please include a new map with soils data, or depict on other maps.
48. Appendix A - Please label contours on all maps (typical).
49. Figure 4 - Please depict project boundary on map.
50. Figure 4 - Please include all topographic data and depict flowlines used for calculations.
51. Figure 4 sheet 2 - Please depict direction of breakout flow discussed in text.
52. Figure 4 sheet 2- Curb opening shows a length required in the table - should this be opening length provided as an existing condition?
53. Figure 6 - Please explain where runoff from proposed watershed 4p is being conveyed to in text and include direction - topo appears to indicate it splits to the west and east, or perhaps enters the subdivision through a rock lined channel.
54. Figure 7 - Please include a detail of the new channel to depict its confluence with the existing channel. Please super elevation is accounted for at the confluence and within the RAS modeling and include a discussion in the text.
55. Appendix C - Please include weir calculation sheet, catch basin calculation sheet.
56. Appendix E - Please include basin stage storage table, outlet routing information.

Stephen Blood
(520) 837-4958
Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov
03/09/2021 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Assuming either a 6” or an 8” slab thickness, lot 63 will require a backwater valve. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.
03/09/2021 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
03/09/2021 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved 02/24/21 Tucson Electric Power Co. (TEP) has reviewed and approves the Development Package/Tentative Plat for Bella Tierra Phase 2, Lots 1-105, submitted on January 22, 2021.

TEP will prepare an electrical design on an Approved Tentative Plat. Easements for electrical facilities must be shown on the Final Plat in order for TEP to approve the plat.

Please note that on Sheet 5 of the Development Package/Tentative Plat that Dkt 1010 Pg 2499, referencing the 33’ ROW for Wingate Blvd, is incorrect.

Please have the customer revise this.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 820-9154.

Courtney Tejeda, Right of Way Agent
Land Resources Dept. RC131
Tucson Electric Power Co.
03/09/2021 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed
03/09/2021 JPEELDA1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Cul-De-Sac for fire department turn arounds shall be 96' per the IFC.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov
520-837-7033
03/09/2021 ALEXANDRA HINES DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Is the SFR on lot 39 proposed as one-story or two-story? Add as general note. If two-story, comply with Privacy Mitigation in UDC 8.7.3.M and provide in general note. There is adjacent one-story SFR.

Alexandra Hines
alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov
03/09/2021 JPEELDA1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change They are going to make the side walk and surb driveable to attain the 96'
03/09/2021 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved 02/22/21 No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA, Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks and Recreation
(520) 837-8040
03/09/2021 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved
03/10/2021 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: March 10, 2021
Returned for Corrections

PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP21-0014
DESCRIPTION: Tentative Plat / FLD/Grading/SWPPP - Bella Tierra, Phase 2. Lots 1-105 and common areas A-1 to A-2 (open space, grading), B-1 to B-3 (functional open space), C-1 to C-8 (landscape, grading), and D-1 (drainage).

FEES DUE: $ 9,284.80 - Tentative Plat fees were calculated/added since the last email we sent to you.

Please pay the total fees (or at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees). A payment is required before your resubmittal.
ONLINE PAYMENT
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees

If information is not available or amount isn't correct, check back in a few hours after data is updated.
(Visa, MC, Discover, American Express, or pay from bank account)
1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees
2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000
(not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed)
3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank
4- Click the blue tab: Continue
5- Under the Pay column, check the boxes
6- Click Continue

RESUBMITTAL
Submit the following documents to:
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
(Select "Existing Application", then the permit number)

1) Comment Response Letter
(your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments)
2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made)
3) Any other documents requested by review staff

- Title the documents for your 2nd submittal starting with the
submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set

SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.)
- Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Permits - click on blue tab
- Reviews - click on Review Details
- Documents - click on View to the right of each document

For all NEW development package submittals on the Filedrop page, select the box: "SITE REVIEW...".

Thank you.

City of Tucson
Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist
Planning and Development Services
email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov