Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP21-0009
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/18/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/03/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/17/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Development Services Department Zoning Review PROJECT: 2611-2625 E. Grant Rd Development Package (1st Review) DP21-0009 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 17, 2021 DUE DATE: February 17, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is January 17, 2022. FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.5 – Remove the PDSD approval stamp from the plan as it will be electronically applied once the plan is approved. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.8 – The north arrow shown in the upper right corner of the sheet is not correct. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.3.9 - The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide the name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP21-0009 , adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Provide a general note on the plan stating “EXISTING AND PROPOSED USE MULTIFAMILY”. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Once approved complete the PDMR/TSMR notes. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Remove the references to Lot Coverage as it is not applicable in the C-2 zone for a non-residential use, see UDC Article 6.3.3.C. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the, right-of-way width, and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.D and Table 7.4.6-2 the minimum two-way access lane width is 20’-0”, proposed is 19’-0”. A Parking Design Modification Request (PDMR) must be submitted and approved prior to approval of this DP. The PDMR and required TSMR can be processed under the same application and fees. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least two feet from a wall, screen , or other obstruction over six inches. That said provide a setback dimension from unit 2625 west to the access lane. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines , to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping , walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said clearly show what type of barrier is proposed for the vehicle use area. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Based on aerial photos the area shown as vehicle parking has historically been vehicle parking for the existing units. The two required vehicle parking spaces for the two (2) studios are required to be over and above the required number of vehicle parking spaces for the existing units. Provide a vehicle parking calculation that demonstrates that there are two (2) parking spaces in this area that are not required for the existing units. Also it appears that you are removing a space with the access aisle for the accessible parking space. Clearly show all required vehicle parking spaces on the plan. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.D and Table 7.4.6-1 the minimum vehicle parking space depth is 18’-0”, show the 2’-6” overhang on the plan. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.b – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.D.2.b Minimum Width Requirement When Adjacent to Barrier, a motor vehicle off-street parking space must have a minimum width of ten feet when the side(s) of the parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport. That said the northern most vehicle parking space is required to be 10’-0” wide. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short - & long – term bicycle parking space calculation for the two (2) studios. Also provided a detail for both that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1, .2, 7.4.9.C & 7.4.9.D are met. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height of each structure within the footprint of the building(s). 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.3.A All sidewalks must be a minimum of four feet wide and installed to avoid any obstruction which decreases the minimum width to less than four feet, proposed is 3’-0”. A Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) must be submitted and approved prior to approval of the DP. The TSMR and required PDMR can be processed under the same application and fees. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.2 Sidewalks associated with PAALs must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation (minimum six inches), barriers, railings, or other means, except at designated crosswalks. That said clearly demonstrate that the proposed sidewalk id physically separated from the access lane. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin, (520) 837-4966 or Elisa.Hamblin @tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 02/18/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Based on the records of Tucson Water, the new duplex and the existing SFR are both served by a 5/8" water meter, not a 1" meter as noted on the construction plans for the duplex (T20CM05688). Provide water demand calculations that include the plumbing fixtures in both buildings and the hose bibbs served by the existing water meter. |
| 02/19/2021 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP21-0009 1) Provide waste stream calculations on plans per TSM section 8-01.8.0 showing that the existing service is sufficient for the proposed expansion. Otherwise show how the required service will be provided 2) Provide a complete pedestrian circulation path according to TSM section 7. This includes a path to the existing trash service 3) Provide spot grades for the new pedestrian/ADA access path and show on plans that cross slopes and running slopes will be maintained. Also show that the ADA parking space will have a maximum slope in all direction of 2% 4) Provide a detail for the new curb access ramp showing how it is intended to work. No dimensions for the ADA path connecting to it are shown 5) A reduction in the width of the required pedestrian connection to E Grant Rd, the resulting decrease in access lane width will not be supported for the following reasons a. The existing site wall appears to be within the required site visibility triangles b. The plan does not show physical separation between the pedestrian path and the access aisle c. The current curb cut does not meet specifications for PAG standard detail 206 or The current entry point is not radiused according to Technical Standards Manual section 10-01.3.2.C 6) Show on plans Site Visibility Triangles for the access lane at E Grant Rd John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/23/2021 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data The Development Package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Add case number and DP21-0009 on each sheet. Ensure that Zoning comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. |
| 02/24/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: February 24, 2021 Returned for Corrections PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP21-0009 DESCRIPTION: SITE - 2613 E. Grant Road, site expansion from garage to duplex. FEES DUE: $ 594.00 (Fire added additional review time fee since our earlier email was sent to you.) Please pay the total fees (or at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees). A payment is required before your resubmittal. ONLINE PAYMENT https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees If information is not available or amount isn't correct, check back in a few hours after data is updated. (Visa, MC, Discover, American Express, or pay from bank account) 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 4- Click the blue tab: Continue 5- Under the Pay column, check the boxes 6- Click Continue RESUBMITTAL Submit the following documents to: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then the permit number) 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Title the documents for your 2nd submittal starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document For all NEW development package submittals on the new Filedrop page, select the box: "SITE REVIEW..." for quicker processing. Thank you. City of Tucson Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |