Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP20-0271
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/27/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/15/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Development Services Department Zoning Review PROJECT: 2845 N 1st Ave – Vehicle Storage Multi Housing Development Package (2nd Review) DP20-0271 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 15, 2021 DUE DATE: September 24, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is January 04, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 1 - This comment was not fully addressed provide the case number on sheets 2 & 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP20-0271 , adjacent to the title block on all sheets. – 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. PREVIOUS COMMENT 2 - This comment was not fully addressed. Retail Trade Use Group is a Group not a use. It appears the use should be General Merchandise Sales, excluding Large Retail Establishment subject to Use Specific Standard, 4.9.9.B.1. You mention “VEHICLE STORAGE” and that the vehicles are stored until they are worked on so there are considered part of the Automotive Service and Repair use. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The use shown under General Note 3, “AUTOMOTIVE USE” is not a Use defined in the UDC. Clarify what the existing and proposed use/uses are. If you are proposing separate uses as you have shown in the vehicle parking calculation each use needs to be listed under General Note 3 along with any applicable Use Specific Standards. A separate Certificate of Occupancy will be required for each use. If the storage is associated with an Automotive - Service and Repair use it would be considered Automotive - Service and Repair and parked accordingly. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. PREVIOUS COMMENT 6 - Clarify is access is still proposed across the west property line, if not provide some type of barrier to prevent vehicles from accessing the parcel to the west, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H. . COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Access through the R-2 zoned property to the west is not allowed and will require either a Board of Adjustment for Variance or a Rezoning. If one of the two (2) process is approved the proposed development shown on the parcel to the west will need to be included on this DP and the vehicle use area will need to meet all requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 4. PREVIOUS COMMENT 7 - Clarify is access is still proposed across the west property line. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Until legal access to the vehicle parking area is provided Zoning will not be making any additional comments about the vehicle use area. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 5. PREVIOUS COMMENT 12 - 8COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation shall include number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. Single Family Dwelling = 2, General Merchandise Sales should be 2,600/300 = 9, Automotive Service and Repair should be 7540/300 = 25 for a total required of 36. Based on 36 spaces the number of accessible spaces would be 2, one being van accessible. Based on 22 spaces provided a Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until the proposed/existing uses are clarified the required number of vehicle parking spaces cannot be verified. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 6. PREVIOUS COMMENT 11 - COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Per UDC Article 7.4.8.B.1 The number of short and long-term bicycle parking spaces required for each Land Use Group, Class and Type is listed in Table 7.4.8-1. Single Family Dwelling = 0, General Merchandise Sales should be short-term 2,600/5000, minimum requirement is 2 spaces = 2 Long term 2,600/12000, minimum requirement is 2 spaces = 2, Automotive Service and Repair should be short-term 2 spaces, Long term 7,540/12000, minimum requirement is 2 spaces = 2. Total Short-term required = 4, total long-term required = 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Until the proposed/existing uses are clarified the requirement for Short- & Long-Term bicycle parking cannot be verified. 7. PREVIOUS COMMENT 12 - This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a detail for the Long-Term bicycle parking that clearly demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1, & 7.4.9.C are met. 8. PREVIOUS COMMENT 14 - This comment was not addressed correctly, per COT MS&R Plan the future edge of pavement for a 120’ ROW is 9’-0” from future ROW line. The future sidewalk was not shown. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 9. PREVIOUS COMMENT 17 - This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage and the height of all structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 10. PREVIOUS COMMENT 18 - This comment was not fully addressed show the required sidewalk from the buildings out to the property line along 1st. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. That said show the required sidewalk from the proposed building out to 1st Ave. If the vehicle access to the west is approved so the required sidewalk on the plan. Additional comments due to changes to the plan: 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – As the area between BLDG 2 and 3 is to narrow to support vehicle access demonstrate how vehicle well be prevented from accessing this area. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – As it appears you are proposing access across the adjacent parcel, 612 E Laguna St, to the north demonstrate on the plan that the vehicle parking still works for 612 E Laguna. Based on aerial photos it appears that historically vehicle parking was along the west edge of the parcel. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan for 612 E Laguna with your next submittal. Additional comments maybe forth coming once the last approved plan is provided. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Some type of cross access agreement or easement is required. Provide a copy of the recorded document with your next submittal. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Demonstrate how vehicles will be prevented from accessing the unimproved area west of BLDG 4 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin, (520) 837-4966 or Elisa.Hamblin @tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/22/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Fire department access roads that exceed 150ft shall be provided with a turn around per IFC 2018 Appendix D If the connection between Building 3 and 2 are used the access lane shall be 26' wide in that area. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 |
| 09/29/2021 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination FROM: Anne Warner, PLA PDSD Landscape/Native Plant Preservation Section PROJECT: Patrick Loop ACTIVITY NO: DP20-0271 Address: 2845 N 1st Ave Zoning: Existing Use: Automotive storage Proposed Use: Automotive storage TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 29, 2021 DUE DATE: September 24, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. 1. UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. 2. Please provide revised landscape calculations on the landscape plan, including required trees for the parking areas, Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.A.2.c and landscape borders, UDC Technical Standards 2-10.4.2.f & g. 3. A Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. 4. Identify the point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow. 5. The landscape plan is insufficient in detail, see Admin. Manual Section 2-10. 6. A 5’ wall and a landscape border is required along the west boundary adjacent to the R-2 residential property. TABLE 7.6.4-1: LANDSCAPE BORDER (SECTION 7.6.4.C) AND SCREENING STANDARDS (SECTION 7.6.5). There are existing trees along this boundary that may satisfy some of the landscape border requirements if left in place. 7. A 10’ street landscape border is required along 1st Ave. TABLE 7.6.4-1: LANDSCAPE BORDER (SECTION 7.6.4.C) AND SCREENING STANDARDS (SECTION 7.6.5) The applicant can explore the Design Development Option 3.11.1 https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/2019_DDO_for_Landscape_Screening_UDC.pdf to see if that offers some relief from the landscape requirements. The other alternative is petition the Board of Adjustment for a variance. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Zoning_Administration_Application_BA_fillable.pdf 8. An irrigation plan is required. UDC 7.6.6.E. 9. Please add/call out soil moisture gauge/tensiometers and rain shut-off device on irrigation plans and details. UDC 4.2.A. 10. Identify water meter and POC on irrigation plan. 11. Please label the existing and future rights of way for 1st Avenue and Leguna St, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 12. Per Admin. Manual 2-10-4.2.D, provide page/detail reference to civil drawings/details that show bike racks, walkways, and screening/retaining walls on landscape plans. 13. Provide a maintenance schedule for the landscape and irrigation for this project. UDC 2-10-4.2.A.4. 14. Ensure that trees in vehicular use areas are planted within and adjacent to parking so that they afford the greatest amount of shade in paved areas, UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 and UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp Select "Existing Application" 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff |
| 11/08/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. See previous comment 1 - The discharge in the wash on the adjacent property is estimated at 184 cfs in the 100-year event. This requires an erosion hazard setback of 14 feet from the top of the bank of the wash. Show the bank of the wash on the Development Package site plan. Also show and dimension the 14 feet from the top of bank as the Erosion Hazard Setback. 2. See previous comment 2 - The Major Streets and Routes right-of-way for 1st Avenue at this location is 120 feet. Show the MS&R ROW location and future curb location. 3. See previous comment 5 - Provide a cross-access easement for access from the adjacent property. Provide for access up to Laguna St. 4. See previous comment 7 - Provide the waste stream calculations and show solid waste storage and service locations. Plans not showing the solid waste collection maneuverability with dimensions to ensure adequate space to pull in and back out. Also show the trash enclosure required from the waste stream calculations along with details per Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 8-01. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/11/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: Alex Enoch, Pat Loop Thu 11/11/2021 4:10 PM Returned for Corrections: DP20-0271 DESCRIPTION: Site/Floodplain - Vehicle Storage for Patrick Loop. New storage building. 2845 N 1ST AV FEES DUE: $ 165.00 (additional review time by Fire Dept, $82.50 x 2 hours) ONLINE PAYMENT If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank 4- "Continue" 5- In the Pay column - check the boxes 6- "Continue" SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections - Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS - Documents section - click on VIEW INCLUDE IN RESUBMITTAL 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your THIRD submittal documents according to this example: 3_Comment Response Letter FILEDROP for Resubmittal https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp - Select "Existing Application" - In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov (disregard the email response that will be sent automatically) |