Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP20-0271
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/05/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/28/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 02/03/2021 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will may be needed and should contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Add case number DP20-0271 on each sheet. Buildings Greater Than 10,000 Square Feet On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building (s) is more than 10,000 square feet, expansion in square footage of land area, floor area , lot coverage , or vehicular use area as follows: a. If the expansion is less than 25%, the standards of this section apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning standards in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval. b. If the expansion is 25% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991, cumulatively result in a 25% or greater expansion in land area, floor area , lot coverage , or vehicular use area , the standards of this section apply to the entire site. Provide expansion calculation. If applicable: Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-10.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. Ensure that Zoning, Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply |
| 02/12/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Development Services Department Zoning Review PROJECT: 2845 N 1st Ave – Vehicle Storage Multi Housing Development Package (1st Review) DP20-0271 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 12, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is January 04, 2022. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, DP20-0271 , adjacent to the title block on all sheets. – 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The use shown under General Note 3, “AUTOMOTIVE USE” is not a Use defined in the UDC. Clarify what the existing and proposed use/uses are. If you are proposing separate using as you have shown in the vehicle parking calculation each use needs to be listed under General Note 3 along with any applicable Use Specific Standards. A separate Certificate of Occupancy will be required for each use. If the storage is associated with an Automotive - Service and Repair use it would be considered Automotive - Service and Repair and parked accordingly. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As 1st Avenue is listed on the COT Major Streets & Routes plan as an arterial provide a general note stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R).” 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – The building area expansion calculation is not correct. Per UDC Article 7.4.3.E.3 expansion calculations for vehicle parking start from April 1, 1969 and for bicycle from 1990. That said BLDG’s 1, 2 & 3 should be as the total gross floor area and the expansion start after that. Either way the propose expansion, 6750 SF exceeds and 25% expansion for vehicle & bicycle parking, pedestrian circulation, and the 50% for landscape. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary perimeter information, bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, for the north and south property lines. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 6. COMMENT: That said the access through the R-2 zoned property to the west is not allowed and will require either a Board of Adjustment for Variance or a Rezoning. If one of the two (2) process is approved the proposed development shown on the parcel to the west will need to be included on this DP and the vehicle use area will need to meet all requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Access to the vehicle parking area is provided Zoning will not be making any additional comments about the vehicle use area. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until the proposed/existing uses are clarified the required number of vehicle parking spaces cannot be verified. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – As the vehicle parking spaces shown along the east side of existing buildings are located within the future right-of-way (ROW) and you are required to design to the future ROW they do not count toward the required number of parking spaces. See UDC Article 5.4.2. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Until the proposed/existing uses are clarified the requirement for loading zones cannot be verified. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Until the proposed/existing uses are clarified the requirement for Short- & Long-Term bicycle parking cannot be verified. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a detail for the Long-Term bicycle parking that clearly demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1, & 7.4.9.C are met. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate on the plan or detail how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e & .g, and 7.4.9.B.2.f are met. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Under Project Info note 4 the perimeter yard setback listed for the east, street perimeter yard is not correct. Per UDC Article 11.4.6 definition of Established Area Setback, streets that are designated on the MS&R map are not considered Established Area for setbacks and are considered developing area for setback. That said per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and TABLE 6.4.5.C-I, ADT of 1,000 or greater, the required street perimeter yard setback along 1st is 21’ or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two (2) measured from the back of future curb. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Per UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE C-1, C-2, C-3, OCR-1, & OCR-2 Zones, C-2 Zone, Non-Residential Use to Residential Zone the required perimeter yard setback is 1 ½ time the height of the proposed exterior building wall. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall where the exterior wall meets the roof, see UDC Article 6.4.55.B. Has the only height provide for the west end of the proposed building was “30’-1” TO THE CENTER OF PITCH AFG” Zoning cannot determine the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed building to the west property line. Provide fully dimensioned elevations with the next submittal so that perimeter yard setbacks can be verified. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage and the height of all structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. That said show the required sidewalk from the proposed building out to 1st Ave. If the vehicle access to the west is approved so the required sidewalk on the plan. 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. That said show the required sidewalk along the north side of the propose building. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. That said show the required sidewalk along both sides of the access lane located between the existing buildings. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.C A sidewalk is required adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene. That said a 4’ sidewalk is required along the entire distance of the existing buildings and the vehicle parking spaces. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B A sidewalk must be provided to include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – It appears that the proposed Short-Term bicycle parking encroaches and area that is required to be a sidewalk. Cleary demonstrate that the minimum 4’ sidewalk is provided. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Clearly demonstrate how a disable person in a wheel chair will be able to access from the proposed accessible parking space, shown north of the proposed building, to the sidewalk, near the northeast corner of the proposed building. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin, (520) 837-4966 or Elisa.Hamblin @tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 02/16/2021 | GDAURIA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | * Paved fire access (20' wide) from 1st Ave. required to within 200' of all exterior portions of the new structure, Possibly, sprinklering the building could be approved in leiu of adequate access. |
| 03/01/2021 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The discharge in the wash on the adjacent property is estimated at 184 cfs in the 100-year event. This requires an erosion hazard setback of 14 feet from the top of the bank of the wash. Show the bank of the wash on the Development Package site plan. 2. The Major Streets and Routes right-of-way for 1st Avenue at this location is 120 feet. Show the MS&R ROW location and future curb location. 3. Show design details for the wash crossing on the adjacent property. Show that the crossing will not cause an obstruction to the flow in the wash. 4. A floodplain use permit will be required for this project. The floodplain use permit should be initiated through the online application portal. Include an engineering report showing the crossing won't cause an obstruction. 5. Provide a cross-access easement for access from the adjacent property. 6. Show how water harvesting will be maximized. 7. Provide a waster stream calculation and show solid waste storage and service locations. 8. Commercial access must be paved from the street. Show details of access to this site from the adjacent parcel. 9. Access to the commercial use from the residential zoned property is not allowed. Contact the zoning reviewer for details. Loren Makus, EIT Loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/01/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: March 1, 2021 Returned for Corrections PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0271 DESCRIPTION: Site/Floodplain - Patrick Loop, adding new vehicle storage building to existing site FEES DUE: $ 1,206.50 Please pay the total fees (or at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees). A payment is required before your resubmittal. ONLINE PAYMENT https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees If information is not available or amount isn't correct, check back in a few hours after data is updated. (Visa, MC, Discover, American Express, or pay from bank account) 1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees 2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 4- Click the blue tab: Continue 5- Under the Pay column, check the boxes 6- Click Continue RESUBMITTAL Submit the following documents to: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then the permit number) 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Title the documents for your 2nd submittal starting with the submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document For all NEW development package submittals on the new Filedrop page, select the box: "SITE REVIEW..." for quicker processing. Thank you. City of Tucson Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |