Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP20-0249
Parcel: 107123080

Address:
526 E LAGUNA ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP20-0249
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/01/2022 JPEELDA1 FIRE REVIEW Approved new plans were submitted.
03/11/2022 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change Add the recordation sequence number for the recorded flowage easement on the plans.

Loren Makus
loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov
03/14/2022 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Email from: COTDSDPermits
To: Alex Enoch, Pat Loop
Mon 3/14/2022 12:40 PM

REVIEW NOTICE
Returned for Corrections: DP20-0249

DESCRIPTION: SITE - Multi-housing for Patrick Loop.
526 E LAGUNA ST

FEE BALANCE: $ 82.50
(one additional hour review time by Fire Dept)

ONLINE PAYMENTS
If amount doesn't match "Fees Due", check back in a few hours
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees
1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees
2- Enter Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000
(not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed)
3- Business/Individual Name: Leave this field blank
4- "Continue"
5- In the Pay column - check the boxes
6- "Continue"

YOUR NEXT STEPS
1. SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.)
- Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Permits - click on blue tab to see different sections
- Reviews section - click on REVIEW DETAILS
- Documents section - click on VIEW

2. UPLOAD A RESUBMITTAL and include:
1) Comment Response Letter (your response to REQUIRES CHANGE comments)
2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made)
3) Any other documents requested by review staff

Please title your FOURTH submittal documents according to this example: 4_Comment Response Letter

FILEDROP:
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
- Select "Existing Application"
- In the "Permit Number" field, enter the number and, if applicable, any notes for our staff
- Select "PLANS" for all documents for quicker downloading of your documents on our end

Thank you.
Sharon Beasley, Building Permit Specialist

City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services
Email: COTDSDpermits@TucsonAz.gov
12/02/2021 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
12/27/2021 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: Development Services Department Zoning Review

PROJECT: Patrick Loop - Multifamily
Development Package (3rd Review)
DP20-0249

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 27, 2021

DUE DATE: December 30, 2021

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is February 2, 2022.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

1. This comment was not addressed. There are no dimensions shown on the back-up spur located at the west end of the southern parking area. This comment was not fully addressed fully dimension the back-up spur and provide the required barriers see comment above. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide back-up spurs at the east and west end of the PAAL providing access to Units 2 & 3, see UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4.

The following comments are based on the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.2.B.2 that this site is required to the requirements of TSM 7-.1 for the entire site.

2-06.4.9.R – Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – It is not clear where all of the required sidewalks are located.
The following TSM Sections need to be addressed:
This comment was not fully addressed no sidewalk was provided along the south side of unit 1
7-04.4.1.B – A sidewalk is required along the east and south side of Unit #1
7-04.4.1.B – Based on changes to the plan a sidewalk is required along the east side of the southern most future unit.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin, Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
12/30/2021 AWARNER1 LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved