Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP20-0226
Parcel: 141019270

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP20-0226
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/14/2021 SBLOOD1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Accessible parking sign detail on sheet 2 needs to show the 7' min. clearance from the bottom of the van sign and not the reserved parking sign as per TSM 7-01.4.3.B.

Stephen Blood
(520) 837-4958
Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov
01/18/2021 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: January 18, 2021

Returned for Corrections / Request for Resubmittal

PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0226
DESCRIPTION: Site/Grading/SWPPP - Tucson Medical Center, Rincon ASC, new medical office.

FEES: $ 484.00 (Building Permit Fee, payable now or after this permit is approved)

ONLINE PAYMENT
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/fees

PLEASE READ: If information is not available or amount isn't correct, check back in a few hours after data is updated.

(Visa, MC, Discover, American Express, or pay from bank account)
1- Click on: Pay Planning & Permit Fees
2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000
(not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed)
3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank
4- Click the blue tab: Continue
5- Under the Pay column, check the boxes you want to pay
6- Click Continue, then enter your credit card info
7- If any issues, try using the browser Internet Explorer

RESUBMITTAL OF UPDATED/CORRECTED DOCUMENTS
Submit documents to NEW FILEDROP:
https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp

1) Comment Response Letter
(your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments)
2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made)
3) Any other documents requested by review staff

- Title the documents for your 2nd submittal starting with the
submittal number, for example: 2_Plan_Set

SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro
(If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.)
- Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number
- Permits - click on blue tab
- Reviews - click on Review Details
- Documents - click on View to the right of each document

FYI - For all NEW development package submittals in the future (not resubmittals) on the Filedrop page, select the box: "SITE REVIEW...".

Thank you.

City of Tucson
Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist
Planning and Development Services
email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov
11/04/2020 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed
11/04/2020 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed
11/04/2020 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
11/04/2020 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed
11/12/2020 GDAURIA1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change * Hydrants to be located within 600' of all exterior portions of the building and approved by TFD.
* Show fire underground on plan.
11/13/2020 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved (The TEP FACILITIES MAP mentioned below can be viewed online: www.TucsonAz.gov/Pro. See the Documents section.)

WO#6331495
November 13 2020

SUBJECT: TMC Rincon ASC, DP20-0226

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 05, 2020. There do not appear to be any conflicts.

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.

In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300.
Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans.

If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should
be sent to:
Tucson Electric Power Company
Attn: Ms. Bianca Maubach
New Business Project Manager
P. O. Box 711 (OH 204), Tucson, AZ 85702
520-307-3864

Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area Designer Chuck Leon, at (520) 400-6133.

Sincerely,
Conor Mahoney, Office Support Assistant
Design/Build
11/30/2020 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the site drawing to include the invert and rim elevations of the manholes upstream and downstream of the connections to the public sewer. Include the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018.
2. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018.
12/01/2020 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved 12/01/20
No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA, Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks and Recreation, (520) 837-8040
12/02/2020 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL


4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data


All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.



The Development Package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:


Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.



Add case number and DP20-0226 on each sheet.


Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning and PAD 12 document.


Ensure that Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval.


Additional comments may apply
12/02/2020 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
12/09/2020 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved
12/29/2020 ELISA HAMBLIN ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Nicholas Martell
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Development Package (1st Review)
DP20-0226

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 12/23/2020
DUE DATE: 12/23/2021

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is August 16, 2021.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: Provide the email address of the developer on the title block of each page in the development package (2-06.4.1)
2. COMMENT: Provide the assigned development package case number, DP20-0026, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. (2-06.4.3)
3. Ensure all easements are shown on the plans. (2-06.4.8)
4. COMMENT: Provide drawings of the off-site parking that will be utilized for the new site. Any parking that is located off-site must be shown on the plans. (2-06.4.9.H.5.b)






If you have any questions about this transmittal, you may contact me at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package