Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP20-0224
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/15/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/09/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office PROJECT: 1855 W Drexel Rd – Fire Station #18 Additions Development Package (2nd Review) DP20-0224 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 9, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is November 1, 2021. Previous comment 4. The DDO needs to be approved prior to approval of this DP. If approved provide a general note stating the DDO case number, T21SA00085, date of approval, what was modified, and if applicable any conditions of approval. Also provide the DDO case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. Demonstrate compliance with use-specific standard 4.9.13.F. which requires a minimum 5 ft screen wall on the portion of the site abutting a residential property, in this case it would apply to the eastern fence/wall adjacent to the fire station. This must be a solid, opaque wall, unless modified through a variance (deletion of the requirement) or constructed of another material (chain link and slats) and modified through a Design Development Option (DDO), which is an administrative process. The DDO request would be for a substitution of materials to include slatted chain link fencing and vegetation in lieu of a solid wall. Contact Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov for more information on either of these options. Previous comment 10. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide a PAAL width dimension for the PAAL located to the northwest of the three (3) easterly most parking spaces. It does not appear that this PAAL meets the 24’ minimum width. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces and parking areas, fully dimensioned. Include dimensions for all Parking Area Access Lanes (PAAL) and Access Lanes. See UDC Article 7.4.6.D. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. Previous comment 12. This comment was not fully addressed. Demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e, 7.4.9.B.2.b, .f, & .g are met. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide detail for short-term bike parking. Previous comment 13. This comment was not addressed correctly, both street setbacks listed show the setback as from the “FRONT LOT LINE ON MS&R” when the setback is measured from the back of future curb. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. Correct setbacks (lines and general notes) for Drexel Rd and Oak Tree Rd. As both streets are a Major Street and Route, developing area setbacks are applied as found in UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2. Setback from both streets is 21 ft or the building wall height (whichever is greater) as measured from the back of future curb. Previous comment 15. This comment was not addressed, provide width dimensions for all sidewalks. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. Provide dimensions for all pedestrian areas. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/20/2021 | SSHIELD1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/20/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: JPrice and ALoberg Tue 4/20/2021 9:22 AM Returned for Corrections PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0224 DESCRIPTION: SITE - Addition to Fire Station 18, City of Tucson. 1855 W DREXEL RD FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. RESUBMITTAL - FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then the permit number) 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Title your 3rd submittal documents according to this example: 3_Comment Response Letter, 01.01.21 SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document Thank you. Sharon Beasley Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov (Disregard any automatic reply you might receive) |