Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP20-0223
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/15/2021 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/06/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 04/07/2021 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/09/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office PROJECT: 2002 S Mission Rd – Fire Station #15 Addition Development Package (2nd Review) DP20-0223 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 9, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 1, 2021. Previous comment 3. This comment was not addressed. 2-06.4.4.B – In the location map on sheet 1, identify all streets that abut the subject property Previous comment 4. The DDO needs to be approved prior to approval of this DP. If approved provide a general note stating the DDO case number, T21SA00084, date of approval, what was modified, and if applicable any conditions of approval. Also provide the DDO case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. Demonstrate compliance with use-specific standard 4.9.13.F. which requires a minimum 5 ft screen wall on the portion of the site abutting a residential property. This must be a solid, opaque wall, unless modified through a variance (deletion of the requirement) or constructed of another material (chain link and slats) and modified through a Design Development Option (DDO), which is an administrative process. The DDO request would be for a substitution of materials to include slatted chain link fencing and vegetation in lieu of a solid wall. Contact Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov for more information on either of these options. Previous comment 12. This comment was not addressed. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. Correct setbacks (lines and general notes) for San Juan Tr, San Antonio Dr, and Placita Del Jubilo. As San Juan Tr is a Major Street and Route, developing area setbacks are applied to all streets as found in UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2. Setback from San Juan Tr is 21 ft or the building wall height (whichever is greater) as measured from the back of future curb. Setback from San Antonio and Placita Del Jubilo are 21 ft or the building wall height (whichever is greater), as measured from the outside edge of adjacent travel lane. Previous comment 13. This comment was not addressed. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). Provide sq ft and height of existing storage building on west of property. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/20/2021 | SSHIELD1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/20/2021 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Email from: COTDSDPermits To: JPrice Tue 4/20/2021 9:39 AM Returned for Corrections PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP20-0223 DESCRIPTION: SITE - Addition to Fire Station 15, City of Tucson. 2002 S MISSION RD FEE BALANCE: $0 (zero) Thank you for the payment. RESUBMITTAL - FILEDROP https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp (Select "Existing Application", then the permit number) 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff Please title your 3rd submittal documents according to this example: 3_Comment Response Letter, 01.01.21 SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, Activity Search, enter the Activity/Permit Number - Permits - click on blue tab - Reviews - click on Review Details - Documents - click on View to the right of each document Thank you. Sharon Beasley Permit Specialist City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov (Disregard any automatic reply you might receive) |